April 13 to April 19
In 1773, a Changhua man named Liao Chen-sheng (廖陳生) walked in on his older brother having sex with his wife. He killed both of them with a sickle, beheaded them and took the heads to the authorities.
Killing one’s older brother normally entailed a punishment of death by a thousand cuts, but the law back then granted clemency for husbands who catch their wife cheating — provided that he committed the murder on the spot.
Photo courtesy of US Library of Congress
Taiwan under the Qing Empire had quite comprehensive laws regarding adultery. The general punishment was 90 lashes for both the man and woman, but people who found it too shameful or tedious to go to court would settle the matter privately — often in much more brutal ways. In addition, the husband had the right to divorce or sell the cheating wife.
Over 200 years later, adultery is still a punishable offense in Taiwan. People have been calling for its decriminalization since the early 1990s, and after deeming the law constitutional in 2002, the Council of Grand Justices is expected to make another interpretation next month.
BRUTAL PUNISHMENTS
Photo: Wu Cheng-feng, Taipei Times
Not everyone who killed his wife’s lover during the Qing Dynasty got off as easily as Liao. Japanese anthropologist Kanori Ino mentions this provision in a compendium of Taiwanese customs published in 1901 — although his account included a test.
First of all, the husband would have to get the heads of the wife and lover into the court — either by asking a vendor to smuggle it through the gates in their basket, or by bribing a guard. The two heads would be thrown in a bucket full of water, and if they ended up facing each other, that was proof of the affair. The husband would be rewarded with money for stopping an immoral act, but would also be caned for the murder. If they two heads did not face each other, it would indicate that the victims were innocent, and the husband would face the death penalty.
Due to the frivolousness of this test and a general lack of confidence in the court, more often than not people chose to settle the matter privately, Liu Chi-ying (劉季穎) writes in Research on Adultery Cases in Taiwan During the Qing Dynasty (清代臺灣婦女通姦案件之探究).
Photo: Tsai Chih-ming, Taipei Times
The punishments were often much more brutal than court-ordered ones — Kataoka Iwao’s record on Taiwanese folk customs states that the lightest punishment entailed either shaving the adulterer’s head, cutting his ear off, branding him or forcing him to consume feces. At worst, he would be tied to a rock and thrown into the water, or be half-buried in the ground so that passersby could kick him or spit at him. The same methods were also used on rapists, Iwao writes. Ino also lists sticking a firecracker up the offender’s rectum and setting it off, or gouging his eyes out and parading him through the streets on horseback.
In some cases, the adulterer could atone for his actions by treating the accuser’s family to alcohol or betel nuts, or host an opera performance for villagers to watch. The adulterer could also be asked to donate articles for worship to Buddhist temples with his name written on them, so whoever visited the temple would know what he did.
Another interesting part of Qing law was that the punishment entailed 10 more lashes to each party if the adulterer used trickery or incentives to get the woman to sleep with him as opposed to it happening “naturally.” If the adultery resulted in a child, it was the lover’s responsibility to raise it.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
FROM JAPAN TO THE KMT
The Japanese applied their Western-style criminal code to Taiwan when they arrived in 1895. This was updated in 1908 and used for the rest of their rule. Per the new code, the adulterous pair would both be sentenced to under two years imprisonment. The Qing code mandated that only the husband or his relatives could be the accuser; the Japanese law was even stricter as only the husband could press charges. The wife had no such right if her husband slept with others.
The husband also had to report the crime within six months of it happening, and was required to accuse both the wife and her lover. In 1914, Ho A-pao (何阿匏) of Keelung caught his wife cheating and took her lover to court — but the judge mandated that he had to press charges against his wife too. Ho reportedly thought about it for a long time and decided to drop the case since he didn’t want his wife to go to jail.
Unlike Qing law, the Japanese forbid the husband to sell the cheating wife, but since the custom was still prevalent in those days, many people still chose to settle their matters privately.
The newspapers would comment on the prevalence of adultery cases in Taiwan — a 1905 Taiwan Daily News (台灣日日新報) editorial expressed outrage at six cases within two days in Chiayi; another one in 1911 commented on the increasing number of people incarcerated for adultery. A total of 5,703 people were officially charged for the crime between 1909 and 1942; countless more incidents were settled privately.
The 1920s is commonly seen as a period of “awakening” for Taiwanese women, as more began entering the workforce and participating in public affairs. Attitudes toward marriage and education also changed, and in 1927 an amendment to the criminal code was drafted so that women could also charge their husbands with adultery. It was still far from equal, as the case was only valid if the husband abandoned the wife or treated her badly due to his relationship with another woman.
Japan decriminalized adultery in 1947, but by then Taiwan was under Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) rule. Before 1935, the Republic of China criminal code that the KMT used only punished female adulterers — but by the time they took charge of Taiwan, the law had been changed to treat men and women offenders equally.
This law would persist until present day, making Taiwan one of the few countries in the world that still criminalizes adultery.
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that have anniversaries this week.
Cheng Ching-hsiang (鄭青祥) turned a small triangle of concrete jammed between two old shops into a cool little bar called 9dimension. In front of the shop, a steampunk-like structure was welded by himself to serve as a booth where he prepares cocktails. “Yancheng used to be just old people,” he says, “but now young people are coming and creating the New Yancheng.” Around the corner, Yu Hsiu-jao (饒毓琇), opened Tiny Cafe. True to its name, it is the size of a cupboard and serves cold-brewed coffee. “Small shops are so special and have personality,” she says, “people come to Yancheng to find such treasures.” She
The low voter turnout for the referendum on Aug. 23 shows that many Taiwanese are apathetic about nuclear energy, but there are long-term energy stakes involved that the public needs to grasp Taiwan faces an energy trilemma: soaring AI-driven demand, pressure to cut carbon and reliance on fragile fuel imports. But the nuclear referendum on Aug. 23 showed how little this registered with voters, many of whom neither see the long game nor grasp the stakes. Volunteer referendum worker Vivian Chen (陳薇安) put it bluntly: “I’ve seen many people asking what they’re voting for when they arrive to vote. They cast their vote without even doing any research.” Imagine Taiwanese voters invited to a poker table. The bet looked simple — yes or no — yet most never showed. More than two-thirds of those
In the run-up to the referendum on re-opening Pingtung County’s Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant last month, the media inundated us with explainers. A favorite factoid of the international media, endlessly recycled, was that Taiwan has no energy reserves for a blockade, thus necessitating re-opening the nuclear plants. As presented by the Chinese-language CommonWealth Magazine, it runs: “According to the US Department of Commerce International Trade Administration, 97.73 percent of Taiwan’s energy is imported, and estimates are that Taiwan has only 11 days of reserves available in the event of a blockade.” This factoid is not an outright lie — that
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu’s (洪秀柱) attendance at the Chinese Communist Party’s (CPP) “Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War” parade in Beijing is infuriating, embarrassing and insulting to nearly everyone in Taiwan, and Taiwan’s friends and allies. She is also ripping off bandages and pouring salt into old wounds. In the process she managed to tie both the KMT and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) into uncomfortable knots. The KMT continues to honor their heroic fighters, who defended China against the invading Japanese Empire, which inflicted unimaginable horrors on the
RSS