Parcels piled high at sorting centers and drivers speeding down bike lanes to deliver takeout lunches are ubiquitous sights in urban China, where e-commerce and delivery apps have taken over everyday life.
But the growing embrace of consumerism is generating mountains of waste: The nation will produce as much as 500 million tonnes of waste annually by 2030, the World Bank warns, up from just 30 million in 1980.
There are signs of a fightback against convenience culture — this week the government announced plans to ban plastic bags in major cities and single-use straws from restaurants by the end of this year.
Photo: AFP
The zero-waste movement is also grabbing public attention as its vocal followers try to spread the message of mindful consumption.
“Everything is wrapped with plastic, because that’s convenient, but actually the cost of convenience is tremendous,” says Beijing resident Carrie Yu, who has committed to “zero-waste” living since 2016.
By recycling, repurposing and composting most of their garbage, Yu and her British partner Joe Harvey, are able to fit three months of household waste into just two jars.
Nearly every object in the minimalist apartment they share was selected with reusability and low environmental impact in mind.
A cardboard egg carton sits on a shelf waiting to be reused multiple times before being recycled.
Cloth make-up remover pads are hung up to dry after washing. Many of Yu’s clothes are second-hand or refashioned from worn-out garments.
She buys unpackaged groceries at a local market, and makes sure to avoid restaurants that use disposable chopsticks.
RIVERS OF RUBBISH
GoZeroWaste, an organization set up by Beijing-based activist Elsa Tang, has members in 19 cities across China who meet to swap unwanted items and exchange tips on living more sustainably.
“If we make more responsible choices, we’re not only acting responsibly toward the environment, we’re also being responsible for our lives and our health, and can actually make many changes,” Tang said.
For decades, Chinese people lived in a planned economy where everyday goods were rationed and imported products were a luxury.
Some aspects of zero-waste living, such as reusing packaging, are familiar to older Chinese.
It used to be common for merchants in the country to require packaging deposits for everyday goods like beer and yogurt, said Mao Da, an environmental history professor at Beijing Normal University and member of the China Zero-Waste Alliance.
“We used to think frugality was a glorious tradition,” Mao said.
In the past, people would catch fish from the rivers and lakes near her village, but “you can see the pristine water right now just full of rubbish,” explained Yu, who grew up in rural Hubei province, near Wuhan.
Growing incomes and the rise of shopping and delivery apps like Taobao and Meituan have now put impulse shopping and next-day delivery within the reach of millions.
Young people who moved away to cities “just bring so many things with packaging” whenever they return to visit, the 28-year-old said.
China produced 210 million tonnes of waste in 2017, according to World Bank data, lower than the US figure of 258 million but expected to jump dramatically as incomes grow.
REDUCE, REUSE, RECYCLE
Efforts to tackle consumer waste are “slowly becoming mainstream” in China, Mao said.
Shanghai launched an ambitious garbage separation and recycling programme in July, requiring residents to sort their own trash or risk fines. Beijing is set to roll out similar regulations this year.
In a document released Sunday, the government said the production and sale of disposable polystyrene and plastic tableware will be banned by the end of the year.
The plan also outlaws single-use straws in the food and beverage industry this year, while disposable plastic products should not be “actively provided” by hotels by 2022.
Major corporations are also taking note.
Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba said last year it would make its annual Singles Day shopping festival “green” and set up 75,000 packaging recycling points in the country following the shopping bonanza.
More than 2.3 billion parcels were shipped in the aftermath of last year’s Singles Day, China’s postal authority said.
But corporations tend to emphasise recycling rather than reducing consumption in the first place, even though “we must contain the total volume of the material being consumed,” Mao said.
Yu and Harvey are keen to encourage others to try their way of life and have launched The Bulk House, an online store that sells alternatives to single-use products including biodegradable tape made from cornstarch and washable menstrual pads.
Yu, who made the change after a difficult move forced her to part with most of her belongings and confront her shopping habit, feels the “zero-waste” approach is good for people as well as the planet. She explained: “I just feel so much lighter.”
July 28 to Aug. 3 Former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) reportedly maintained a simple diet and preferred to drink warm water — but one indulgence he enjoyed was a banned drink: Coca-Cola. Although a Coca-Cola plant was built in Taiwan in 1957, It was only allowed to sell to the US military and other American agencies. However, Chiang’s aides recall procuring the soft drink at US military exchange stores, and there’s also records of the Presidential Office ordering in bulk from Hong Kong. By the 1960s, it wasn’t difficult for those with means or connections to obtain Coca-Cola from the
No one saw it coming. Everyone — including the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — expected at least some of the recall campaigns against 24 of its lawmakers and Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) to succeed. Underground gamblers reportedly expected between five and eight lawmakers to lose their jobs. All of this analysis made sense, but contained a fatal flaw. The record of the recall campaigns, the collapse of the KMT-led recalls, and polling data all pointed to enthusiastic high turnout in support of the recall campaigns, and that those against the recalls were unenthusiastic and far less likely to vote. That
Taiwan is today going to participate in a world-first experiment in democracy. Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers will face a recall vote, with the results determining if they keep their jobs. Some recalls look safe for the incumbents, other lawmakers appear heading for a fall and many could go either way. Predictions on the outcome vary widely, which is unsurprising — this is the first time worldwide a mass recall has ever been attempted at the national level. Even meteorologists are unclear what will happen. As this paper reported, the interactions between tropical storms Francisco and Com-May could lead to
A couple of weeks ago the parties aligned with the People’s Republic of China (PRC), the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), voted in the legislature to eliminate the subsidy that enables Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) to keep up with its burgeoning debt, and instead pay for universal cash handouts worth NT$10,000. The subsidy would have been NT$100 billion, while the cash handout had a budget of NT$235 billion. The bill mandates that the cash payments must be completed by Oct. 31 of this year. The changes were part of the overall NT$545 billion budget approved
RSS