Last Friday’s release of the dance video for Jolin Tsai’s (蔡依林) Womxnly (玫瑰少年) — the latest single off her fourteenth album Ugly Beauty (怪美的) — cracked open the song’s significance for a singer long regarded as a gay icon and ally.
The single’s Chinese title, which literally means “Rose Boy,” was the term of endearment for Yeh Yung-chih (葉永鋕), whose death in Apr. 20, 2000 at the age of 15 received national attention.
Prior to his death, Yeh was bullied at school for his perceived effeminate behavior. To avoid harassment, he would use the toilet just before breaktimes, when other students were still in class. When Yeh was found lying in a pool of blood in the toilet of his junior high school in Pingtung County, authorities concluded that a medical condition had caused him to slip and hit his head.
Photo: CNA
Yeh’s mother was critical of the outcome of the investigation and became an LGBTQ advocate. With growing clamor over the circumstances that led to Yeh being alone in the toilet in the first place, the government recalibrated its efforts to understand gender nonconformity and eliminate school bullying.
In December 2000, the Ministry of Education renamed its Gender Equity Education Committee (性別平等教育委員會), reflecting a substantive shift away from a gender binary framework to a more holistic understanding of gender. In June 2004, the Gender Equity Education Act (性別平等教育法) came into force.
The impact of Yeh’s life and death has had years to permeate through Tsai’s artistry, going back to her decision to screen a five-minute documentary featuring Yeh’s mother during her 2015 concert series. It is telling that Womxnly is the only track on Ugly Beauty where Tsai is credited as lead writer. Her lyrics are equal part earnest comfort (“Boy or girl, you can be whichever you want”) and sass (“A life in rosy hues shall be / The cold dish of revenge we serve the haters”) arranged over a very danceable electronic beat.
Photo: Pan Shao-tang, Liberty Times
New Zealand choreographer Kiel Tutin leads Tsai and her dancers through clever costume changes and contrasting facial expressions to embody an individual breaking out of society’s constraints into self-acceptance.
“The song says that regardless of gender, there is no established framework for gender identity,” Tutin wrote on Instagram.
Tsai has never relegated her support for the LGBTQ community to subtext. Most controversially, she and actress Ruby Lin (林心如) played a same-sex couple in the video for her 2014 single We’re All Different, Yet the Same (不一樣又怎樣). In less trustworthy hands, casting two apparently heterosexual women in that role would be criticized as lesbian-baiting. But Tsai only endeared herself to the LGBTQ community with the video’s storyline, which humanized the struggles faced by same-sex partners whose unions are not legally recognized.
It is rare, even in countries with robust civic discourse on human rights and identity politics, for mainstream interpretations of LGBTQ rights to be done well and with respect. Tsai is proving to be a virtuoso, down to the very progressive spelling of Womxnly, a term designed to include marginalized and intersectional groups such as trans women.
Taiwan doesn’t have a lot of railways, but its network has plenty of history. The government-owned entity that last year became the Taiwan Railway Corp (TRC) has been operating trains since 1891. During the 1895-1945 period of Japanese rule, the colonial government made huge investments in rail infrastructure. The northern port city of Keelung was connected to Kaohsiung in the south. New lines appeared in Pingtung, Yilan and the Hualien-Taitung region. Railway enthusiasts exploring Taiwan will find plenty to amuse themselves. Taipei will soon gain its second rail-themed museum. Elsewhere there’s a number of endearing branch lines and rolling-stock collections, some
Could Taiwan’s democracy be at risk? There is a lot of apocalyptic commentary right now suggesting that this is the case, but it is always a conspiracy by the other guys — our side is firmly on the side of protecting democracy and always has been, unlike them! The situation is nowhere near that bleak — yet. The concern is that the power struggle between the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and their now effectively pan-blue allies the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) intensifies to the point where democratic functions start to break down. Both
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and the country’s other political groups dare not offend religious groups, says Chen Lih-ming (陳立民), founder of the Taiwan Anti-Religion Alliance (台灣反宗教者聯盟). “It’s the same in other democracies, of course, but because political struggles in Taiwan are extraordinarily fierce, you’ll see candidates visiting several temples each day ahead of elections. That adds impetus to religion here,” says the retired college lecturer. In Japan’s most recent election, the Liberal Democratic Party lost many votes because of its ties to the Unification Church (“the Moonies”). Chen contrasts the progress made by anti-religion movements in
This was not supposed to be an election year. The local media is billing it as the “2025 great recall era” (2025大罷免時代) or the “2025 great recall wave” (2025大罷免潮), with many now just shortening it to “great recall.” As of this writing the number of campaigns that have submitted the requisite one percent of eligible voters signatures in legislative districts is 51 — 35 targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus lawmakers and 16 targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers. The pan-green side has more as they started earlier. Many recall campaigns are billing themselves as “Winter Bluebirds” after the “Bluebird Action”
RSS