Sept. 24 to Sept. 30
Qing Dynasty admiral Shih Lang (施琅) is not only known for destroying the Tainan-based Kingdom of Tungning (東寧) in 1683, he is also remembered as the man who, despite fierce opposition, convinced China’s Kangxi Emperor to incorporate Taiwan into the empire. However, some sources show that he was secretly plotting a different fate for the island.
In the time between the decisive Battle of Penghu in July 1683 to the formal annexation of Taiwan in April 1684, Shih repeatedly brought up the issue of Taiwan. The first mention came with his victory report, stating that he wouldn’t dare decide on his own the island’s fate, and urged the emperor to either make a decision or send his officials to Fujian Province, where Shih was based.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
The emperor and his top officials did not respond to Shih’s inquiries, preferring to wait until the king of Tungning, Cheng Ke-shuang (鄭克塽), formally surrendered and arrived in Beijing. While Shih argued that Taiwan had “endless stretches of fertile land... where Chinese intermixed with local savages,” most officials did not think much of Taiwan, calling it a “speck of dirt on the outer seas with naked, tattooed savages not worthy of spending our resources on,” among other disparaging remarks. Some proposed only sending troops to Penghu.
According to Chou Hsueh-yu (周雪玉) in the book, The Merits and Demerits of Shih Lang’s Invasion of Taiwan (施琅攻台的功與過), the officials who opposed Shih’s proposals because they were unfamiliar with Taiwan, worried about the cost of keeping a distant land under control and lacked understanding of maritime defenses.
Shih insisted, citing Taiwan’s strategic location and abundant natural resources, adding that foreign powers, including the Dutch who had colonized part of the island, might cause trouble for the Qing.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
THE GRAND SCHEME
A few historians speculate that there was talk about possibly handing Taiwan to the Dutch East India Company (VOC) in Batavia, which corresponds with present-day Central Jakarta in Indonesia. The Dutch were expelled by Cheng Ke-shuang’s grandfather, Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, or Koxinga), in 1662.
Chou writes in her book that it was rival official Lee Kuang-ti (李光地) who proposed allowing the Dutch to return to Taiwan in exchange for yearly tribute.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
However, Cheng Wei-chung (鄭維中) argues in his study, Admiral Shih Lang’s Secret Proposal to Return Taiwan to the VOC, that Shih was the one who plotted returning Taiwan to the Dutch.
In any event, upon the defeat of Tungning king Cheng Ke-shuang, officials in Guangdong and Fujian expected the Qing court to reverse its closure of the southeastern coast, and they started making moves to secure maritime trade rights. Some Fujianese officials had begun to entice Dutch merchants to return to the area, casually mentioning that the emperor “might even give up Taiwan,” writes Cheng Wei-chung.
On the same day that Qing officials met with the Dutch, Shih Lang delivered his report to the emperor, urging him to annex Taiwan. Meanwhile, to protect his financial interests in Fujian, he told Guangdong officials not to trade with the Europeans.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Shih’s next step was to persuade the British East India Company (EIC) and the Dutch to open offices in Fujian — a strategy that would require the emperor’s permission. Shih’s plan required some deft psychology that would convince the emperor that the British residents in Taiwan were prisoners instead of merchants, and that the EIC was grateful to the Qing for freeing them.
In turn, he would convince the emperor to demand tribute from the EIC in exchange for the right to trade in China via Fujian rather than Guangdong.
Shih also freed the Dutch prisoners who had been left behind in Taiwan after Koxinga’s conquest, including Alexander Van Gravenbroek, whom he treated with courtesy because he was fluent in Hoklo (also known as Taiwanese), the main language spoken in southeastern Fujian. Cheng Wei-chung writes that it is through Van Gravenbroek’s reports to the VOC that Shih’s plans to give Taiwan to the Dutch were revealed; there are no Chinese sources.
Shih asked Van Gravenbroek if the VOC would be interested in retaking Taiwan, and if so at what price. The Dutchman replied that the VOC wouldn’t be interested because of the dangers of the Taiwan Strait. Moreover, if they could not establish a base in China with exclusive free trade rights, governing the island would be too costly.
As with the EIC merchants before, Shih had Van Gravenbroek write a letter addressed to the emperor stating that the VOC wanted to resume trade with China, and thanking the Middle Kingdom for freeing the Dutch prisoners.
NOT SO SMOOTH SAILING
Cheng Wei-chung writes that if successful, the scheme would have greatly benefited Shih with “himself cast as the humble servant so selflessly devoted to his duty.”
Shih was banking on collecting money as the go-between for the foreign merchants and Beijing as well as taking bribes from Fujianese merchants for permission to trade with the Dutch. And finally, Fujian, where Shih had considerable economic interests, would have the upper hand against Guangdong.
However, the letters that Shih had the EIC and Van Gravenbroek write were confiscated by Fujian governor Yao Qisheng (姚啟聖), who may have been worried that the English and the Dutch would not cooperate so willingly, and might even expose Shih’s “reckless plan.” Yao also learned that the VOC had little interest in trading with Fujian.
Yao, however, died in 1684 and Shih continued his plan, attempting to convince the court to continue the maritime ban by fabricating, according to Cheng Wei-chung, a “foreign threat... so that he could be assured of being granted a monopoly on foreign trade in Xiamen and Taiwan.”
Between the noncooperation of the new Fujian governor, the emperor’s insistence on rescinding the maritime ban and Shih’s overconfidence in the VOC’s desire to trade with China and reoccupy Taiwan (they were more interested in India at that point), the plan ultimately failed.
Shih and his followers became wealthy nonetheless, claiming much of the farmland owned by the people of Tungning. He also collected tribute from Penghu fishermen, which he pocketed himself.
“This caused Taiwan’s devastation to be worse in peacetime under Shih than during the previous decades of war,” writes Shih Wan-shou (石萬壽) in the study, Discussion of Keeping or Leaving Taiwan (台灣去留之討論).
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that have anniversaries this week.
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
On March 13 President William Lai (賴清德) gave a national security speech noting the 20th year since the passing of China’s Anti-Secession Law (反分裂國家法) in March 2005 that laid the legal groundwork for an invasion of Taiwan. That law, and other subsequent ones, are merely political theater created by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to have something to point to so they can claim “we have to do it, it is the law.” The president’s speech was somber and said: “By its actions, China already satisfies the definition of a ‘foreign hostile force’ as provided in the Anti-Infiltration Act, which unlike
Mirror mirror on the wall, what’s the fairest Disney live-action remake of them all? Wait, mirror. Hold on a second. Maybe choosing from the likes of Alice in Wonderland (2010), Mulan (2020) and The Lion King (2019) isn’t such a good idea. Mirror, on second thought, what’s on Netflix? Even the most devoted fans would have to acknowledge that these have not been the most illustrious illustrations of Disney magic. At their best (Pete’s Dragon? Cinderella?) they breathe life into old classics that could use a little updating. At their worst, well, blue Will Smith. Given the rapacious rate of remakes in modern
RSS