For Xu Youyu (徐友漁), the Cultural Revolution is a page in China’s history the country has yet to turn. Xu, a professor of philosophy, political dissident and signatory of Charter 08, a manifesto that calls for political reform in China, worries that nostalgia has warped people’s historical memory of those tumultuous years.
“Many Chinese misunderstand the Cultural Revolution as a glorious time of freedom of speech and association,” Xu says.
This revisionist account, he adds, papers over the tragic and violent effects wrought by this decade-long period of upheaval, and obscures a crucial lesson: “to pin a country’s hopes on a strongman will result in unprecedented disaster.”
Photo: Reuters
Xu is disheartened by the “re-emergence of a Cultural Revolution mindset” in China. He says that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) attempts to become “the second Mao Zedong (毛澤東)” will only spell trouble.
Though some in Taiwan may question democracy and envy Xi, the country must reaffirm its commitment to freedom and its democratic way of life, Xu says. Against the resurgence of authoritarianism and the rise of illiberal political culture, Xu hopes the country will prove a bulwark of liberal values.
CULTURAL REVOLUTION REDUX
Photo: Philip Tsien
Xu is wary of China’s reversion to Mao-style politics. He hears echoes of the Cultural Revolution in today’s political climate, and fears the consequences.
Xi’s arbitrary anti-corruption campaign mirrors Mao’s peremptory Cultural Revolution-era purges. Xu warns that just as Mao’s purges led to chaos and injustice, so too does Xi’s crackdown undermine the rule of law.
For Xu, this is but one example of Xi’s many efforts to emulate “Mao’s excesses,” such as crafting a cult of personality and centralizing power, to the detriment of the Chinese people. He says that under Xi, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has run roughshod over civil society, tightening its grip over political, social and cultural life.
Photo: Reuters
“Officials worship at the altar of Xi, but they have done little to help the people,” Xu says. Instead, Xi and the CCP have moved decisively toward authoritarian governance, as evidenced by their decision to abolish constitutional limits on presidential terms.
Xu, however, remains cautiously optimistic. “Though the current situation is bleak, civil society will continue to grow and develop, however slowly. It is just a matter of time,” he says. “Once born, a baby cannot re-enter the womb.”
HOPE ACROSS THE STRAIT
Xu sees Taiwan as an encouraging and necessary counterpoint to Xi’s unabashed authoritarian posture. He says that since emerging as one of Asia’s most vibrant democracies, the country has been a testament to the enduring strength and appeal of liberal values.
Xu says that while “Taiwanese democracy is not perfect,” its problems pale in comparison to those found in China. A free and dynamic press, diverse civil society, an independent judiciary: for Xu, these institutions, and the ideals they represent, form what he hopes will be Taiwan’s enduring legacy.
He cautions Taiwanese, however, against taking their society for granted. The allure of “efficient and powerful government” under one-party or strongman rule is great, but must be resisted, Xu says. To those who cast doubt on the merits of Taiwan’s democracy, Xu’s suggestion is simple: “They can spend some time in China and see what they prefer. I think the choice will be clear.”
“Taiwanese democracy is young, and the threats it faces are serious,” he says. He adds that Taiwanese should reaffirm their support for the “fundamental values that undergird their free and stable society” and safeguard their democracy.
UNEASY FUTURE
“China’s current situation is hardly a full repeat of the Cultural Revolution,” Xu acknowledges. He says that the Chinese Communist Party’s emphasis on stability rules out the massive social unrest and violence of the 1960s and 1970s. After all, China has embraced a market economy.
“But the circumstances are still grave,” he says.
Xu says that though there exists an active group of young Chinese committed to liberal values and political reform, a majority are either unaware or unconcerned. While he hopes Chinese exchange students studying in Taiwan can “bring home the idealism” that abounds among young Taiwanese, he is unsure of the impact this would have on political conditions in China.
As the CCP extends its reach into Chinese society, he says, the further away the goal of achieving constitutional democracy appears.
To Xu, the specter of the Cultural Revolution still looms.
In the March 9 edition of the Taipei Times a piece by Ninon Godefroy ran with the headine “The quiet, gentle rhythm of Taiwan.” It started with the line “Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention.” I laughed out loud at that. This was out of no disrespect for the author or the piece, which made some interesting analogies and good points about how both Din Tai Fung’s and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) meticulous attention to detail and quality are not quite up to
April 21 to April 27 Hsieh Er’s (謝娥) political fortunes were rising fast after she got out of jail and joined the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in December 1945. Not only did she hold key positions in various committees, she was elected the only woman on the Taipei City Council and headed to Nanjing in 1946 as the sole Taiwanese female representative to the National Constituent Assembly. With the support of first lady Soong May-ling (宋美齡), she started the Taipei Women’s Association and Taiwan Provincial Women’s Association, where she
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
It is one of the more remarkable facts of Taiwan history that it was never occupied or claimed by any of the numerous kingdoms of southern China — Han or otherwise — that lay just across the water from it. None of their brilliant ministers ever discovered that Taiwan was a “core interest” of the state whose annexation was “inevitable.” As Paul Kua notes in an excellent monograph laying out how the Portuguese gave Taiwan the name “Formosa,” the first Europeans to express an interest in occupying Taiwan were the Spanish. Tonio Andrade in his seminal work, How Taiwan Became Chinese,