May 21 to May 27
Cars were overturned, furniture was destroyed and an American flag was ripped and thrown off the second floor balcony of the then-US embassy in Taipei. The angry crowd wreaked havoc on the building for nearly 10 hours before the authorities dispersed the protesters — leading the Americans to wonder if the May 24, 1957 attack was orchestrated by the government.
“In a city notorious for its elaborate secret services and policing agencies ... why was a riot such as this permitted to go unchecked for hours?” writes George Kerr in Formosa Betrayed, noting that certain people were warned of possible trouble days in advance and that the incident happened while president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) was on a mountain retreat, US Ambassador Karl Rankin was in Hong Kong and the army’s chief officers were visiting the offshore islands.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
The incident was in response to the killing of government employee Liu Tzu-jan (劉自然) by US soldier Robert Reynolds, who allegedly discovered Lee in his garden peeping at his wife, who was taking a shower. Reynolds claims that Lee attacked first with a stick, and he fired two fatal shots in response. There were no witnesses with little evidence, and Reynolds was acquitted by an American military court to the applause of Americans in the courtroom and flown out of the country on May 23.
The United Daily News (聯合報) reported that the nation was in shock over the ruling, and that “resentment and agitation has permeated every corner of society.”
The paper further stated in an editorial, “Protesting the US Army’s Disdain for Human Rights” (抗議美軍蔑視人權): “We can’t help but question US law and the Americans’ lofty ideals of protecting human rights. Otherwise, it simply means that the life of an American has far more value than one of [ours]. Liu is dead, and Reynolds runs free. Isn’t that the bloody truth?”
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Dressed in black, Liu’s widow stood in front of the embassy the next morning to protest the ruling. This attracted a crowd as things quickly escalated and went out of control.
AMERICAN ACCOUNT
Both Chiang and Rankin later reflected on the incident. Chiang’s public speech made that July regarding the riots can be found in the National Central Library, while Rankin provides an account in his memoir, China Assignment.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons :
Rankin had returned to Taiwan during a lull in the riots. The embassy was empty then, but the crowd was still there, throwing stones at his car.
“The buildings were gutted. Everything inside that could be lifted had been thrown out the doors and windows … my personal car was on its side, with a safe dropped on it from the floor above,” he writes. “The police begged us to leave. There were very few of them, and they feared that a new incursion might start at any moment.”
Rankin notes that he was able to account for all his staff by 7pm that night — they had avoided harm by hiding in an air raid shelter and were later escorted out by the police. Only one was hospitalized.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Rankin later told US news station CBS that Taiwanese officials were too slow in providing adequate protection, and asked for “full compensation and an adequate apology.”
In the following weeks, 111 people were arrested, with about 40 receiving sentences of six months to one year. Rankin does not speak of any conspiracy or premeditation in his account.
“My eventual conclusions were quite simple,” he writes. “There had been no serious public disorder in Taiwan for 10 years, and internal security had become lax. The city authorities were not prepared to deal with a large mob, either in terms of equipment or numbers of police.”
He also notes that the only people who could have given orders for the army to act — namely Chiang and the Minister of Defense — were not available at that time.
“We were satisfied that while some of Liu’s friends and his widow had planned a small demonstration in the hope of a cash settlement from the US, the outbreak of violence had been spontaneous,” he concludes.
THE GENERALISSIMO SPEAKS
Of course, Chiang’s speech begins with a bunch of anti-Communist rhetoric, but he quickly cut to the chase: “In the past six months, not only have we not been able to achieve any concrete achievements, we have exposed the weaknesses in all levels of our government and brought the greatest shame to our country in 60 years — the ignorant, useless, shameless and pathetic riots that took place in Taipei on May 24.”
He chastises the people and his staff in a long tirade, saying that it has greatly affected the goal of retaking China by attacking their American allies.
“To be honest, we cannot withstand another blow to our international standing, which has turned us into the laughingstock of the world,” he says. “I personally believe that after this incident, our international friends have less trust in us, and domestically, this will be a great chance for people who oppose our party to denounce us.”
Chiang says that the riots could have been avoided if the military police had taken action once people started gathering outside the embassy and contacted their superiors immediately, adding that nothing was reported until the attacks were already under way. He was especially angry that the Taipei Police Department never made an official report to City Hall, greatly slowing the spread of information to other departments. He blasted the convoluted chain of command within the government structure, and also denounced the government’s incompetence in dealing with the immediate aftermath of Liu’s killing, leading to the Americans taking over the investigation and acquitting Reynolds of wrongdoing.
The rest of the speech is a long and winding lecture on how the government has grown idle since retreating to Taiwan and that it should always stay alert and keep up with modern ideas and technology because they must not forget the ultimate goal of defeating the Communists.
“If all departments can follow even 50 percent of my instructions and teachings over the past seven years, I believe that there will not be another May 24 Incident,” he says.
At the time of the incident, Taiwan and the US were still hammering out the details of the Status of Forces Agreement with the Republic of China, which included whether US staff and soldiers were immune from Taiwanese jurisdiction.
Law professor Chiu Hung-dah (丘宏達) writes in a study on the agreement that the US agreed that Taiwan would have jurisdiction over “members of the US armed forces or civilian component and their dependents.” However, Taiwan waived its primary rights to exercise jurisdiction except for certain cases, including security offenses against the government and offenses against Taiwanese citizens, including murder, robbery and rape.
Check out the following link for a video of the riots by the Associated Press: www.youtube.com/watch?v=VANq_EXvZj4
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that have anniversaries this week.
On Jan. 17, Beijing announced that it would allow residents of Shanghai and Fujian Province to visit Taiwan. The two sides are still working out the details. President William Lai (賴清德) has been promoting cross-strait tourism, perhaps to soften the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) attitudes, perhaps as a sop to international and local opinion leaders. Likely the latter, since many observers understand that the twin drivers of cross-strait tourism — the belief that Chinese tourists will bring money into Taiwan, and the belief that tourism will create better relations — are both false. CHINESE TOURISM PIPE DREAM Back in July
Could Taiwan’s democracy be at risk? There is a lot of apocalyptic commentary right now suggesting that this is the case, but it is always a conspiracy by the other guys — our side is firmly on the side of protecting democracy and always has been, unlike them! The situation is nowhere near that bleak — yet. The concern is that the power struggle between the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and their now effectively pan-blue allies the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) intensifies to the point where democratic functions start to break down. Both
Taiwan doesn’t have a lot of railways, but its network has plenty of history. The government-owned entity that last year became the Taiwan Railway Corp (TRC) has been operating trains since 1891. During the 1895-1945 period of Japanese rule, the colonial government made huge investments in rail infrastructure. The northern port city of Keelung was connected to Kaohsiung in the south. New lines appeared in Pingtung, Yilan and the Hualien-Taitung region. Railway enthusiasts exploring Taiwan will find plenty to amuse themselves. Taipei will soon gain its second rail-themed museum. Elsewhere there’s a number of endearing branch lines and rolling-stock collections, some
This was not supposed to be an election year. The local media is billing it as the “2025 great recall era” (2025大罷免時代) or the “2025 great recall wave” (2025大罷免潮), with many now just shortening it to “great recall.” As of this writing the number of campaigns that have submitted the requisite one percent of eligible voters signatures in legislative districts is 51 — 35 targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus lawmakers and 16 targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers. The pan-green side has more as they started earlier. Many recall campaigns are billing themselves as “Winter Bluebirds” after the “Bluebird Action”
RSS