Taiwan in Time: Nov. 23 to Nov. 29
Songshan Airport was flooded with six-colored Buddhist flags on the morning of Nov. 25, 1955, as a large crowd waited eagerly for the plane doors to open.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Cheers erupted as five Japanese monks exited a plane, the one in front holding a box. A 100-car procession followed them out of the airport, with people praying and burning incense on the side of the road all the way to Shandao Temple (善導寺), where more than 1,000 people watched as the Japanese monks handed the box to Taiwanese monks.
The box housed a prized relic, a piece of the legendary Chinese monk Xuanzang’s (玄奘) skull. The fragment today rests at Xuanzang Temple (玄奘寺) at Sun Moon Lake.
Xuanzang’s claim to fame is his journey by foot to India to seek Buddhist sutras, a story that’s immortalized in the classic novel Journey to the West (西遊記).
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
In late 1942, Takamori Takasuke, commanding officer of the Japanese troops stationed in China’s capital city of Nanjing was overseeing construction of a Shinto shrine outside of the city gates. An officer reported that they found something unusual — a stone box containing a piece of bone. Inscriptions reportedly identified the owner as Xuanzang, whose remains had been considered lost after the temple that housed it was destroyed in 1856.
Accounts vary on what happened to the bone. Sun Moon Lake’s official Web site and other tourism publications state that the Japanese brought it back to their home country. However, most academic sources, including Hsuan Chuang University (玄奘大學) religion professor Huang Yun-hsi (黃運喜), say it was broken into three pieces, one going to Beijing, one staying in Nanjing and the third piece being brought to Japan and placed in a shrine.
This division of relics isn’t without precedent. When Siddhartha Gautama (also known as Buddha) died, eight Buddhist countries laid claim to his remains. To avoid war, a monk divided the remains (or part of them) into eight pieces and each king brought one home to worship.
After the Chinese Civil War, the Buddhist Association of the Republic of China (中國佛教會) retreated to Taiwan with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). They, too, decided they wanted a piece of the bone.
Fo Guang University assistant professor Kan Cheng-tsung (闞正宗) writes in a paper about Xuanzang’s remains that the association first requested the bone during the 1952 World Buddhist Fellowship conference in Japan. Negotiations stalled with the death of Takamori, while the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aggressively tried to block the move, saying it rightfully belonged to China and the Japanese “plundered” it during the war.
An announcement by the Central News Agency stated that the bone needed to go to “free China,” referring to the Republic of China government in Taiwan, instead of the “fake bandit Buddhist association” (偽匪佛教協會) of Beijing.
A telegram by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs further stated that China shouldn’t get the bone because the communists were anti-religion and didn’t allow freedom of worship, and to succumb to their demands would leave a “bad impression on the free world.”
This didn’t turn out entirely false, as at least two pieces of the bone were reportedly destroyed during the Cultural Revolution.
Jionji, the temple which housed the bone in Japan, released a statement on Nov. 10, 1955 regarding their decision to give a fragment to Taiwan, stating that China already had several of the fragments, and that instead the rest should be distributed to places where it would benefit believers.
They further stated that they were acting in accordance with Xuanzang’s ideals of spreading Buddhism for the benefit of all sentient beings and that there were no political motives. They even agreed to send pieces of the relic to India, where Xuanzang stayed for 15 years.
“Even though the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of China are divided by politics, they have in common their respect and admiration of Xuanzang,” it concluded. “We Japanese Buddhists respect this beautiful religious position.”
Despite other locales such as Miaoli’s Shihtou Mountain (獅頭山) vying to house the bone, the location of Sun Moon Lake was already decided in early 1955, determined to be a “suitable place” by Chang Chia (章嘉), head of Taiwan’s Buddhist association. The original plan was to bring the bone back to Nanjing after the reconquest of China, but obviously that never happened.
The fragment was first housed in a temporary temple near Sun Moon Lake, but the current temple took 10 years to build because of bureaucracy and budget issues. With its completion, the journey of this fragment was complete — for now.
An ironic footnote to the story is that in September 1998, after many years of petitioning the Chinese, Hsuan Chuang University received a different fragment of the skull, split from the piece that remained in Nanjing — from the very country that tried to prevent Taiwan from receiving the same thing 43 years earlier.
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that have anniversaries this week.
On Jan. 17, Beijing announced that it would allow residents of Shanghai and Fujian Province to visit Taiwan. The two sides are still working out the details. President William Lai (賴清德) has been promoting cross-strait tourism, perhaps to soften the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) attitudes, perhaps as a sop to international and local opinion leaders. Likely the latter, since many observers understand that the twin drivers of cross-strait tourism — the belief that Chinese tourists will bring money into Taiwan, and the belief that tourism will create better relations — are both false. CHINESE TOURISM PIPE DREAM Back in July
Could Taiwan’s democracy be at risk? There is a lot of apocalyptic commentary right now suggesting that this is the case, but it is always a conspiracy by the other guys — our side is firmly on the side of protecting democracy and always has been, unlike them! The situation is nowhere near that bleak — yet. The concern is that the power struggle between the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and their now effectively pan-blue allies the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) intensifies to the point where democratic functions start to break down. Both
Taiwan doesn’t have a lot of railways, but its network has plenty of history. The government-owned entity that last year became the Taiwan Railway Corp (TRC) has been operating trains since 1891. During the 1895-1945 period of Japanese rule, the colonial government made huge investments in rail infrastructure. The northern port city of Keelung was connected to Kaohsiung in the south. New lines appeared in Pingtung, Yilan and the Hualien-Taitung region. Railway enthusiasts exploring Taiwan will find plenty to amuse themselves. Taipei will soon gain its second rail-themed museum. Elsewhere there’s a number of endearing branch lines and rolling-stock collections, some
This was not supposed to be an election year. The local media is billing it as the “2025 great recall era” (2025大罷免時代) or the “2025 great recall wave” (2025大罷免潮), with many now just shortening it to “great recall.” As of this writing the number of campaigns that have submitted the requisite one percent of eligible voters signatures in legislative districts is 51 — 35 targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus lawmakers and 16 targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers. The pan-green side has more as they started earlier. Many recall campaigns are billing themselves as “Winter Bluebirds” after the “Bluebird Action”
RSS