Taiwan in Time: Oct.19 to Oct. 25
Taiwan is one of a handful countries in the world not a member of the UN, stemming back to Oct. 25, 1971 when UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 was ratified in a two-thirds vote.
The resolution, sponsored by Albania, recognized the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as “the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations” and expelled “the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek [蔣介石] from the place which they unlawfully occupy at the United Nations and in all the organizations related to it.”
Photo: Wang Pei
The issue was that after the Chinese Civil War, the PRC under the Chinese Communist Party gained control of China, with Chiang’s Republic of China (ROC) government under the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) relegated to Taiwan and other minor islands. Yet both governments continued to claim to be the legitimate ruler of both China and Taiwan.
In fact, the ROC was a charter member of the UN, formed also this week, on Oct. 24, 1945, along with the Soviet Union, the UK and the US.
The UN General Assembly debated transferring China’s seat from the ROC to the PRC throughout the 1950s and 1960s, but the US was able to use its influence to block the move.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
As early as 1950, the UK recognized the PRC as the legitimate government of China, severing relations with the ROC. But things really started changing in the 1960s, as the PRC gained the support of a large number of newly independent nations (mostly in Asia, South America and Africa) that changed the composition of the international body. And in 1964, even France, decided to recognize the PRC.
Starting in 1961, the US and other countries would introduce a resolution every year deeming any proposal to change China’s representation an “important question” that required a two-thirds majority to pass. That resolution would pass every time, but the vote for the subsequent resolution regarding accepting the PRC became increasingly tighter, reaching a tie in 1965.
Canada established ties with the PRC in October 1970. A month later, for the first time a majority supported the PRC’s admission with a 51 to 49 vote — although still not meeting the two-thirds requirement.
Photo taken from the book ‘The KMT and The ROC’
The US had tried to propose the idea of dual representation by allowing both governments into the UN (with the PRC taking over the Security Council seat) but neither Chiang nor the PRC would likely have agreed to such an idea due to their insistence on being the sole ruler of China and Taiwan.
The US submitted a dual representation resolution in 1971 nonetheless. Albania, however, had already submitted its bid to admit the PRC and it was to be voted on first. If passed, then dual representation would be a moot point. The Americans made one last effort by proposing to remove the “expulsion of Chiang” part from Albania’s resolution, but the motion was rejected.
Before the vote, the ROC delegation announced that they would not take part in further proceedings and walked out of the General Assembly.
Photo: Wang Yi-sung, Taipei Times
On Oct. 27, Chiang officially declared the ROC’s withdrawal from the UN and its refusal to recognize the resolution.
“The United Nations has set justice aside, shamefully prostrating to evil forces and cowardly yielding to violence,” he wrote. “The United Nations that my country helped form is now a hotbed of evil, and history will prove that the Republic of China’s declaration of withdrawal will also be the declaration of the destruction of the United Nations.”
“My compatriots, the fate of our country is not in the hands of the United Nations, but in our own,” he added.
The resolution never directly mentioned the ROC or Taiwan, but the country’s bid for membership starting in the 1990s under variations of “Republic of China, Taiwan” and in 2007 as “Taiwan.”
It has continuously been rejected largely because of China’s opposition and claim that Taiwan is part of its territory and not a sovereign country.
In 2008, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) stopped applying as part of his “diplomatic truce” policy toward China, but Taiwanese-Americans continue to protest outside the UN Headquarters in New York each year.
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that have anniversaries this week.
Feb. 17 to Feb. 23 “Japanese city is bombed,” screamed the banner in bold capital letters spanning the front page of the US daily New Castle News on Feb. 24, 1938. This was big news across the globe, as Japan had not been bombarded since Western forces attacked Shimonoseki in 1864. “Numerous Japanese citizens were killed and injured today when eight Chinese planes bombed Taihoku, capital of Formosa, and other nearby cities in the first Chinese air raid anywhere in the Japanese empire,” the subhead clarified. The target was the Matsuyama Airfield (today’s Songshan Airport in Taipei), which
On Jan. 17, Beijing announced that it would allow residents of Shanghai and Fujian Province to visit Taiwan. The two sides are still working out the details. President William Lai (賴清德) has been promoting cross-strait tourism, perhaps to soften the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) attitudes, perhaps as a sop to international and local opinion leaders. Likely the latter, since many observers understand that the twin drivers of cross-strait tourism — the belief that Chinese tourists will bring money into Taiwan, and the belief that tourism will create better relations — are both false. CHINESE TOURISM PIPE DREAM Back in July
Could Taiwan’s democracy be at risk? There is a lot of apocalyptic commentary right now suggesting that this is the case, but it is always a conspiracy by the other guys — our side is firmly on the side of protecting democracy and always has been, unlike them! The situation is nowhere near that bleak — yet. The concern is that the power struggle between the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and their now effectively pan-blue allies the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) intensifies to the point where democratic functions start to break down. Both
This was not supposed to be an election year. The local media is billing it as the “2025 great recall era” (2025大罷免時代) or the “2025 great recall wave” (2025大罷免潮), with many now just shortening it to “great recall.” As of this writing the number of campaigns that have submitted the requisite one percent of eligible voters signatures in legislative districts is 51 — 35 targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus lawmakers and 16 targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers. The pan-green side has more as they started earlier. Many recall campaigns are billing themselves as “Winter Bluebirds” after the “Bluebird Action”
RSS