Gluttony and lavishness aren’t usually associated with a Buddhist vegetarian meal, but those were the first things on my mind upon entering Jen Dow Vegetarian Buffet Restaurant (人道素菜百匯餐廳), which offers all-you-can-eat meals priced at NT$660 for lunch and NT$770 for dinner.
Located in the Howard Garden Suites building on Changchun Road (長春路) in Taipei, Jen Dow displays the typical hallmarks of a pricey hotel buffet. Diners sit on plush chairs at tables covered with white tablecloths and mosey their way back and forth between several long rows of well-prepared Asian-style food kept warm on silver chafing dishes. There’s a fully stocked juice and cocktail bar, a fresh fruit and salad bar, a dessert table with dozens of cakes and sweets and a chocolate fondue fountain, several freezers full of Haagen-Dazs ice cream — and the list goes on.
The restaurant caters to “su” (素) vegetarians, who avoid garlic, onion, leek or any other strong-flavored foods that are said to overstimulate the body and mind.
Photo: David Chen, Taipei Times
At Jen Dow, this means the sauce on your pasta, prepared fresh upon request by a chef at the buffet, might lack the sweet and pungent bite that only garlic and onion can deliver. The same goes for anything you get at the vegetable stir-fry station, an open kitchen where another chef cooks whatever fresh greens are on hand. Still, I was impressed with what he did with the plate of kongxincai (空心菜), the long and stringy shimeiji mushrooms and bean sprouts that I handed him. The greens were done just right: They were cooked in a mild but flavorful broth and retained a nice crisp.
The buffet offers decent adaptations of standard dishes like sweet-and-sour pork, with the meat replaced by tofu, and Hakka-style stir-fried eggplant. As with many vegetarian restaurants, most dishes utilize mushrooms and tofu as the main ingredients.
On a recent visit, I took a liking to a vegetarian version of another Hakka dish, stir-fried flat rice noodles (客家板條), which was tasty enough to have seconds. I wasn’t as crazy about the Malaysian-style curry, which had a gingery bite meant to replace the chili. If you’re in the mood for Japanese, there’s always the “sashimi” bar, with the fake tuna and salmon made out of konjac (蒟蒻), a plant-based gelatin. It will never beat the real thing, but it’s worth a try if you’re feeling adventurous.
In general, the Asian-style dishes at Jen Dow are better than the Western ones. You will find nice little surprises, like blue cheese and fresh baguettes at the pasta bar, but the Hyatt it is not.
I tend to gravitate toward the dim sum section whenever I visit — Jen Dow does a better job on these dishes than a similar buffet, the Ever Green Vegetarian Restaurant (長春素食, see page 14 of the April 30, 2010, edition of the Taipei Times for a review). You can’t go wrong with the steamed rice noodle rolls (腸粉), the fried turnip cake (蘿蔔糕), and fried spring rolls, which I find just as appetizing as the versions with meat.
Strangely, Jen Dow serves alcohol, with a selection of wines and cocktails on offer at an extra charge. If you want to imbibe in the presence of the monks, nuns and devout Buddhists that make up a sizable part of Jen Dow’s regular clientele, martinis are NT$150, mojitos are NT$90 and a range of Glenmorangie single malts are available from NT$150 to NT$180 per glass.
Overall, Ever Green remains a better value option at NT$560 for dinner and NT$500 for lunch, as it has a wider variety and the quality of its food is just as good. But if the amenities are important to you, then Jen Dow has the edge — the dining room is tidier and feels more upscale, given its location inside of a hotel. And the thought of eight varieties of Haagen-Dazs ice cream at an all-you-can-eat buffet can be hard to resist.
April 14 to April 20 In March 1947, Sising Katadrepan urged the government to drop the “high mountain people” (高山族) designation for Indigenous Taiwanese and refer to them as “Taiwan people” (台灣族). He considered the term derogatory, arguing that it made them sound like animals. The Taiwan Provincial Government agreed to stop using the term, stating that Indigenous Taiwanese suffered all sorts of discrimination and oppression under the Japanese and were forced to live in the mountains as outsiders to society. Now, under the new regime, they would be seen as equals, thus they should be henceforth
Last week, the the National Immigration Agency (NIA) told the legislature that more than 10,000 naturalized Taiwanese citizens from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) risked having their citizenship revoked if they failed to provide proof that they had renounced their Chinese household registration within the next three months. Renunciation is required under the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), as amended in 2004, though it was only a legal requirement after 2000. Prior to that, it had been only an administrative requirement since the Nationality Act (國籍法) was established in
Three big changes have transformed the landscape of Taiwan’s local patronage factions: Increasing Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) involvement, rising new factions and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) significantly weakened control. GREEN FACTIONS It is said that “south of the Zhuoshui River (濁水溪), there is no blue-green divide,” meaning that from Yunlin County south there is no difference between KMT and DPP politicians. This is not always true, but there is more than a grain of truth to it. Traditionally, DPP factions are viewed as national entities, with their primary function to secure plum positions in the party and government. This is not unusual
US President Donald Trump’s bid to take back control of the Panama Canal has put his counterpart Jose Raul Mulino in a difficult position and revived fears in the Central American country that US military bases will return. After Trump vowed to reclaim the interoceanic waterway from Chinese influence, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth signed an agreement with the Mulino administration last week for the US to deploy troops in areas adjacent to the canal. For more than two decades, after handing over control of the strategically vital waterway to Panama in 1999 and dismantling the bases that protected it, Washington has