Disclaimer: Easily offended readers, those of an environmentally aware disposition, or animal rights champions, are advised to exercise caution as this review contains mention of a controversial though fine-tasting duck product, a drink with a bad ecological rap and a reference to food porn.
Opened in April by owner and head chef William “Abu” Bu (布秋榮), formerly of Tutto Bello, Abu Authentic Cuisine from the outside looks much like any nondescript lounge bar with its shiny black facade, mesh curtains obscuring the interior, and blue neon sign.
Inside, the self-assured patter and delicate laughter of wealthy patrons competes with piped chamber music, as the wait staff, some wearing white gloves, glide from table to table. There is a fine line between prison guard service, with beady eyes following every move, and unobtrusive attention to detail, which Abu stays the right side of, though a half-finished cup of delicate pu’er tea (普洱茶) was whisked away by an over-keen busser.
The decor is a symphony of browns, from the fawn satin napkins to the beige, bronze and amber wood flooring.
A word of warning: the AC seems only to have two settings, subtropical or Arctic. The banquette along the sidewall offers the most temperate seating. Upstairs accommodates about 30, while a salon prive downstairs seats 10.
Before ordering, guests are offered Monteforte sparkling or Fiji mineral water — the latter has been heavily criticized for environmentally unfriendly production methods, though its maker says the company is going green.
An assortment of breads, including a baked mochi sesame bun, a mini white torpedo roll that almost required lobster crackers to eat, and crunchy cheese flat bread came to the table accompanied with peppery olive oil, a pat of butter wrapped in gold foil and a pot of eggplant sauce that tickled the umami receptors.
Abu’s menu consists of a five-course lunch and an eight-course dinner set. For the former, the arugula salad with duck confit and fois gras pate (spicy king prawn and apple salad is the alternative appetizer choice) was a lesson in self-restraint with its dainty slice of velvety vice sandwiched between paper-thin crackers and drizzled with a smidgen of truffle oil. The king Hokkaido scallop coconut and lemon grass soup (the other soup option is chicken broth and quail leg) impressed with its expertly seared plump mollusk and frothy consistency.
For the main, the oven-roasted lamb loin in pistachio crust, served with jus (NT$1,600), was surprisingly delicate — while many restaurants make their jus to the strength of industrial glue, Abu’s erred towards the subdued.
Substitute mains include pan-roasted rib eye steak (NT$1,800), pan-roasted Dover sole with porcini and crab meat sauce (NT$1,500), slow-braised veal shank (NT$1,200), or linguine with crab and garlic white wine sauce (NT$1,000) for the cheapskates.
The two desserts that followed, a fragrant organic rose sorbet and slick parfait, while both above par, ignited a yearning for hot pudding.
Since it began operations, Abu has earned a reputation for quality. A quick trawl of the Net throws up an abundance of sensual shots of artfully presented dishes and satiated diners, and plenty of praise.
After all, some guilty pleasures are worth the remorse.
April 14 to April 20 In March 1947, Sising Katadrepan urged the government to drop the “high mountain people” (高山族) designation for Indigenous Taiwanese and refer to them as “Taiwan people” (台灣族). He considered the term derogatory, arguing that it made them sound like animals. The Taiwan Provincial Government agreed to stop using the term, stating that Indigenous Taiwanese suffered all sorts of discrimination and oppression under the Japanese and were forced to live in the mountains as outsiders to society. Now, under the new regime, they would be seen as equals, thus they should be henceforth
Last week, the the National Immigration Agency (NIA) told the legislature that more than 10,000 naturalized Taiwanese citizens from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) risked having their citizenship revoked if they failed to provide proof that they had renounced their Chinese household registration within the next three months. Renunciation is required under the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), as amended in 2004, though it was only a legal requirement after 2000. Prior to that, it had been only an administrative requirement since the Nationality Act (國籍法) was established in
Three big changes have transformed the landscape of Taiwan’s local patronage factions: Increasing Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) involvement, rising new factions and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) significantly weakened control. GREEN FACTIONS It is said that “south of the Zhuoshui River (濁水溪), there is no blue-green divide,” meaning that from Yunlin County south there is no difference between KMT and DPP politicians. This is not always true, but there is more than a grain of truth to it. Traditionally, DPP factions are viewed as national entities, with their primary function to secure plum positions in the party and government. This is not unusual
US President Donald Trump’s bid to take back control of the Panama Canal has put his counterpart Jose Raul Mulino in a difficult position and revived fears in the Central American country that US military bases will return. After Trump vowed to reclaim the interoceanic waterway from Chinese influence, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth signed an agreement with the Mulino administration last week for the US to deploy troops in areas adjacent to the canal. For more than two decades, after handing over control of the strategically vital waterway to Panama in 1999 and dismantling the bases that protected it, Washington has