America is in mourning. Alex, the African Grey parrot who was smarter than the average US president, has died at the relatively tender age of 31. He could count to six, identify colors, understand concepts such as bigger and smaller, and had a vocabulary of 150 words. To his supporters he was proof that the phrase "bird brain" should be expunged from the dictionary.
Alex was the star of the Alex (Avian Learning Experiment) Foundation, run by Irene Pepperberg at Brandeis University in Boston. She bought him from a pet shop in 1977, and has spent the past 30 years training him and analyzing his progress. "He was my closest colleague," a devastated Pepperberg said at the weekend. "Alex broke all preconceived notions about bird brains. He had the intelligence of a five-year-old and the communication skills of a two-year-old, and sometimes threw tantrums like a small child would. He would take his beak and knock everything on the floor."
The foundation has posted a lachrymose farewell on its Web site: "Please bear with us as we move though this difficult time of grief and regain our composure. We have received thousands of e-mails and continue to go through them. The support you have shown us is overwhelming and we are forever grateful."
PHOTO: NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE
An Internet condolence book has been started in his memory.
It seems that Alex's early death - African Greys are usually expected to live for 50 years or more - has spurred an outpouring of emotion. "As a parrot owner myself, you hope that your bird outlives you," says a poster on science Web site Slashdot. "And yet, in some ways, they're just so delicate. You can't take a nap next to your parrot because you might roll on to it."
The amount of coverage generated in the US by Alex's death - compared, say, with the average natural disaster in the developing world - also reflects the fact that he had become something of a TV celebrity, with, as the New York Times noted, "his own brand of one-liners." (These may not have been Johnsonian in their quality: "Calm down" and "Good morning" are among the examples cited.)
"You be good, see you tomorrow. I love you," Pepperberg reportedly told Alex when she said goodnight to him on that final evening. "You'll be in tomorrow," replied Alex. But for him that tomorrow never came.
As well as appearing on TV, Alex was the subject of numerous scientific papers in which Pepperberg sought to prove that when he talked, he was not just mimicking what he heard, but understood what he was saying. "Pepperberg's pioneering research resulted in Alex learning elements of English speech to identify 50 different objects, seven colors, five shapes, quantities up to and including six and a zero-like concept," said the foundation in a statement announcing his passing. "He used phrases such as 'I want X' and 'Wanna go Y,' where X and Y were appropriate object and location labels. He acquired concepts of categories, bigger and smaller, same-different, and absence. Alex combined his labels to identify, request, refuse and categorize more than 100 different items, demonstrating a level and scope of cognitive abilities never expected in an avian species.
Her research with Alex shattered the generally held notion that parrots are only capable of mindless vocal mimicry."
But not all scientists accepted Pepperberg's pioneering findings. Some argue that Alex was no more than a clever mimic who, adept at social conditioning, was picking up cues from his long-time trainer. Herbert Terrace, a psychology professor at Columbia University famous for his language experiments in the 1970s with a chimpanzee called Nim Chimpsky, is on record as saying that Alex was making a "rote response." "In every situation, there is an external stimulus that guides his response ... . The words are responses, not language." He accepted that Alex was "a smart bird," but said there was, at most, minimal thought involved when he made his responses.
Happily, Pepperberg has two other African Greys, called Griffin and Arthur, left to continue her work. They are younger than Alex and at a less advanced stage in their cognitive development, but she is hopeful that with training they will scale the heights of their predecessor.
Alex's death, as the debate it has prompted on blogs indicates, touches on a number of difficult subjects: the suspect Cartesian differentiation of the world into thinking humans and dumb animals; the argument over where mimicry ends and independent thought begins; the question of whether caging birds for experimentation is legitimate; the contention that teaching animals language is both demeaning and pointless - animals are animals, not ersatz humans; and the degree to which tender American sensibilities should be subjected to verbatim quotations from the Monty Python dead parrot sketch.
Last week, the the National Immigration Agency (NIA) told the legislature that more than 10,000 naturalized Taiwanese citizens from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) risked having their citizenship revoked if they failed to provide proof that they had renounced their Chinese household registration within the next three months. Renunciation is required under the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), as amended in 2004, though it was only a legal requirement after 2000. Prior to that, it had been only an administrative requirement since the Nationality Act (國籍法) was established in
Three big changes have transformed the landscape of Taiwan’s local patronage factions: Increasing Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) involvement, rising new factions and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) significantly weakened control. GREEN FACTIONS It is said that “south of the Zhuoshui River (濁水溪), there is no blue-green divide,” meaning that from Yunlin County south there is no difference between KMT and DPP politicians. This is not always true, but there is more than a grain of truth to it. Traditionally, DPP factions are viewed as national entities, with their primary function to secure plum positions in the party and government. This is not unusual
The other day, a friend decided to playfully name our individual roles within the group: planner, emotional support, and so on. I was the fault-finder — or, as she put it, “the grumpy teenager” — who points out problems, but doesn’t suggest alternatives. She was only kidding around, but she struck at an insecurity I have: that I’m unacceptably, intolerably negative. My first instinct is to stress-test ideas for potential flaws. This critical tendency serves me well professionally, and feels true to who I am. If I don’t enjoy a film, for example, I don’t swallow my opinion. But I sometimes worry
US President Donald Trump’s bid to take back control of the Panama Canal has put his counterpart Jose Raul Mulino in a difficult position and revived fears in the Central American country that US military bases will return. After Trump vowed to reclaim the interoceanic waterway from Chinese influence, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth signed an agreement with the Mulino administration last week for the US to deploy troops in areas adjacent to the canal. For more than two decades, after handing over control of the strategically vital waterway to Panama in 1999 and dismantling the bases that protected it, Washington has
RSS