Buffet restaurants are a common part of the landscape in Taipei offering Japanese, Chinese and Western fare. Rarely does a restaurant incorporate food from so many different cultures into one gluttonous whole like Splendor Restaurant, which is conveniently located three minutes walk, or a longer waddle after dining, from Dapinglin (大坪林) MRT station.
The dining area is large with the buffet taking up one-quarter of the restaurant. The decor is minimalist with black marble walls, white marble tabletops and black rubber chairs that hug the body. The designers of the restaurant clearly understood the distraction that a wide variety of food causes diners, and as a result there is plenty of space to move about when going up for a fourth or fifth helping.
Hip hostess Tseng Yue-li (曾月裡) makes it clear that eating at Splendor should be a total dining experience, not just an excuse to expand your waistline. As such, she recommends trying a variety of dishes before gorging on any one dish from a particular region.
PHOTO COURTESY OF SPLENDOR RESTAURANT
If you are a lover of seafood, the Japanese section has many surprises. In addition to the usual suspects of sashimi, tempura and a variety of hot pot dishes, there are a variety of fresh seafood salads on offer. But what separates this Japanese-themed section from its counterparts is its large assortment of freshly caught fish laid out on a bed of ice or swimming in large tanks.
The wide range of Cantonese cuisine, especially the dim sum, is particularly worthy of mention. With such an array to choose from, it's best to tuck in when the place is busy as eating dumplings that have been sitting for 15 or more minutes is not recommended.
For those who are not afraid of a little protein, prime rib and cooked ham are available. Carved before your eyes, both are cooked to perfection and will be sliced thin or thick, according to your appetite. There is also bratwurst, barbecued mushrooms and a variety of other meats.
Rounding out the meal, if you can fit it in, are eight varieties of Haagen-Dazs ice cream and a staggering variety of desserts, though on this last score I cannot comment, as I was too busy with the ice cream. The restaurant offers bottomless beer and red and white wine. The Taipei Times reminds patrons to drink responsibly.
The Taipei Times last week reported that the Control Yuan said it had been “left with no choice” but to ask the Constitutional Court to rule on the constitutionality of the central government budget, which left it without a budget. Lost in the outrage over the cuts to defense and to the Constitutional Court were the cuts to the Control Yuan, whose operating budget was slashed by 96 percent. It is unable even to pay its utility bills, and in the press conference it convened on the issue, said that its department directors were paying out of pocket for gasoline
On March 13 President William Lai (賴清德) gave a national security speech noting the 20th year since the passing of China’s Anti-Secession Law (反分裂國家法) in March 2005 that laid the legal groundwork for an invasion of Taiwan. That law, and other subsequent ones, are merely political theater created by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to have something to point to so they can claim “we have to do it, it is the law.” The president’s speech was somber and said: “By its actions, China already satisfies the definition of a ‘foreign hostile force’ as provided in the Anti-Infiltration Act, which unlike
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Mirror mirror on the wall, what’s the fairest Disney live-action remake of them all? Wait, mirror. Hold on a second. Maybe choosing from the likes of Alice in Wonderland (2010), Mulan (2020) and The Lion King (2019) isn’t such a good idea. Mirror, on second thought, what’s on Netflix? Even the most devoted fans would have to acknowledge that these have not been the most illustrious illustrations of Disney magic. At their best (Pete’s Dragon? Cinderella?) they breathe life into old classics that could use a little updating. At their worst, well, blue Will Smith. Given the rapacious rate of remakes in modern
RSS