Just across the street from Taipei 101, there is another monument to the joys of disposable income — the Japanese restaurant Peony.
At around NT$1,500 for an entry-level set dinner, Peony is guaranteed to help with that unsightly bulge in your hip pocket. Its innovative, elegant Japanese cuisine may also be the best meal you've had in a long time.
The set dinners — which nearly everyone orders — are simple on paper: salad, sashimi, grilled fish, soup, dessert. There are no choices to make except which price tier you buy into. The difference between the various meals lies primarily in the expense of the ingredients, all of which are top-notch in any case.
PHOTO: CHRIS PECHSTEDT
As is characteristic of Japanese cuisine, it is the ingredients themselves that are the focus of the cooking, says Liu Yao-rong (劉燿榮), who designed Peony's menu. The preparation isn't meant to create a new flavor, but to augment and enhance the original flavors.
My salad, for example, contained greens, fruit, and chilled shrimp, unified with a delicate but distinctly flavored dressing. Light wasabi powder reconciled the sweetness of the fruit with the drier Japanese dressing.
Presentation receives equal attention. The grilled Taiwanese carp (鯃魚), cooked with a type of teriyaki that has none of the smothering sweetness of the standard stuff, is served on a small sheet of juniper wood, which itself rests on a bed of hot pebbles that both keep the fish warm and cause the mild flavor of the wood to seep upward.
The sashimi selection — toro, shrimp, abalone and urchin — is presented on a model of a tropical island (less tacky than it sounds). The urchin comes perched on a glass sphere filled with dry ice.
Atmospherically speaking, floor-to-ceiling windows, lots of glass and spotlighting, and dark, comfortable furniture make Peony look in most respects like a typical comfortable upscale restaurant. What is unique is the subtle peony artwork and calligraphy that covers nearly every vertical surface, all of it commissioned from the artist Chi Wei-yi (戚維義). A single peony floats in a small glass vase at each table.
It was no surprise when one youngish diner stared wistfully at a dish that had just been placed in front of her, then looked up at her boyfriend and was overheard to say with a sigh, "This is why you need to get rich."
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
On March 13 President William Lai (賴清德) gave a national security speech noting the 20th year since the passing of China’s Anti-Secession Law (反分裂國家法) in March 2005 that laid the legal groundwork for an invasion of Taiwan. That law, and other subsequent ones, are merely political theater created by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to have something to point to so they can claim “we have to do it, it is the law.” The president’s speech was somber and said: “By its actions, China already satisfies the definition of a ‘foreign hostile force’ as provided in the Anti-Infiltration Act, which unlike
Mirror mirror on the wall, what’s the fairest Disney live-action remake of them all? Wait, mirror. Hold on a second. Maybe choosing from the likes of Alice in Wonderland (2010), Mulan (2020) and The Lion King (2019) isn’t such a good idea. Mirror, on second thought, what’s on Netflix? Even the most devoted fans would have to acknowledge that these have not been the most illustrious illustrations of Disney magic. At their best (Pete’s Dragon? Cinderella?) they breathe life into old classics that could use a little updating. At their worst, well, blue Will Smith. Given the rapacious rate of remakes in modern
RSS