The story of those who sought to stop the king of Chin from obliterating the diverse kingdoms that later became China has been told in countless books, plays, operas and films. The films on this subject have attracted China's greatest cinematic talent, but on the whole have failed to amount to much. Hero, which opens in Taiwan today, sees another of China's great directors bite the dust in dealing with this same subject.
Zhang Yimou's (
PHOTO: FOX
Hero is certainly something to look at, with two of Hong Kong's most charismatic stars, Maggie Cheung (
PHOTO: FOX
The story opens with Nameless (Jet Li), a sword fighter, entering the grand and forbidding palace of the king of Chin. The starkness of the hall represents the severity of Chin's law, and the symbolism sets the tone for the rest of the movie, which seems almost purposely to abjure any narrative warmth. Style, we are told in the opening scenes, is everything. The tricks that Zhang first used in Raise the Red Lantern (
And Zhang hasn't gone for anything as mundane as historical accuracy in his first costume epic. There is lots of floating gauze and creatively designed weapons, and the Chin soldiers are subjected to the indignity of shooting off their bows with their feet while sitting on the ground, which Zhang has confessed has absolutely no basis in history. But it may be thought exotic by Western audiences.
PHOTO: FOX
The film's structure follows Akira Kurosawa's classic Rashomon (1950) in that it goes over the same ground a number of times from different perspectives -- in this case, a battle of wits between Nameless and the king as to how Nameless managed to kill off Sky (
Unfortunately you never really care which of the versions presented is the true one because the director fails from the beginning to establish any empathy with the characters.
Which leads to the crucial issue of Zhang's resolution to his martial arts epic. Part of the uniqueness of his approach is that he violates many of the fundamental principles of the chivalric hero character -- apolitical, self-interested, care-free -- in order to achieve a grander vision, which unfortunately pulls the carpet out from under the feet of his "heroes," leaving them looking merely foolish. The end result is not an achievement of some higher state of heroism, but defeat at the hands of a tougher operator. For martial arts movie fans, it is all very unsatisfactory.
A long exposition about the character "sword," written by Broken Sword and presented to the king by Nameless, only goes further to underline the political and philosophical chaos that Zhang has become embroiled in, but he seems content to allow the Chinese "culture" of the whole thing to override any need for logical coherence.
Zhang's attempt to transform the selfish individualism of martial arts fighters into a superficial universal love kills all the glamor and fascination of the chivalric spirit. The freedom that characters like Nameless, Snow and Broken Sword are supposed to represent gets all twisted up into a tool of a political exposition.
But all this does not become clear until late in the film, which gets bogged down in its Rashomon structure, telling and retelling the story, leaving very little room for character development. This superficiality is embodied in the character of Moon, played by Zhang Ziyi, who is little more than a face and a clothes rack.
Unfortunately, this is almost the case with Tony Leung and Maggie Cheung as well. Fans of In the Mood for Love can only feel pity for the two great actors wasting their talent on such two-dimensional characters.
The most impressive acting is done by Chen Daoming (
The final scene, showing the king's greatest achievement, the building of the Great Wall -- and all it represents -- can only make one laugh at its total lack of subtlety.
Not only has Zhang compromised the spirit of the chivalric hero, he seems to have compromised his own integrity as well.
Hero
Directed by: Zhang Yimou
Starring: Maggie Cheung (Snow), Jet Li
(Nameless), Tony Leung Chiu Wai (Broken Sword), Zhang Ziyi (Moon), Donnie Yen (Sky)
and Chen Daoming (King of Chin)
Running time: 120 minutes
Taiwan Release: Today
Language: In Chinese with English subtitles
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
Mirror mirror on the wall, what’s the fairest Disney live-action remake of them all? Wait, mirror. Hold on a second. Maybe choosing from the likes of Alice in Wonderland (2010), Mulan (2020) and The Lion King (2019) isn’t such a good idea. Mirror, on second thought, what’s on Netflix? Even the most devoted fans would have to acknowledge that these have not been the most illustrious illustrations of Disney magic. At their best (Pete’s Dragon? Cinderella?) they breathe life into old classics that could use a little updating. At their worst, well, blue Will Smith. Given the rapacious rate of remakes in modern
RSS