In an address made on June 16 of last year, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) commented on the possibilities of navel engagement with the Peoples Liberation Army (PLA) in the Taiwan Strait. His comments were met with incredulity by many in the military and sent shivers down the spines of ordinary citizens.
While the possibility of such an offshore engagement is not something that instantly lends itself to humor, several local artists have joined together in order to take a collective, sarcastic and off-the-wall look at the possibilities of such an event.
PHOTO: CHERNG PIIN GALLERY
Entitled Iconoclasm to Neo-Iconolatry, the exhibition at the Cherng Piin Gallery sees works by seven artists tackling the issue of war with China and deterioration of society in general.
PHOTO COURTESY OF CHERNG PIIN GALLERY
The most prominent of the works on display is by Mei Dean-E (梅丁衍). Returning from the US in 1991 after three years studying Chinese art history under Professor James Cahill at Berkeley, Mei's memories of the post-martial law era in Taiwan remain vivid. Recalling that period today, Mei refers to it as "the era in which everything was deconstructed."
And indeed, deconstruction plays a big part in his latest work. Titled Offshore Engagement (境外決戰), the work depicts jet fighters and bombers attacking four of Taiwan's better known landmarks. The National Palace Museum, the Presidential Office, the Grand Hotel and the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall Plaza, all pictured being unceremoniously leveled by squadrons of the People's Liberation Airforce.
PHOTO: CHERNG PIIN GALLERY
Through the use of computer generated and composite graphics, Mei has created a world that on the outside might appear to be the stuff of nightmares, but within the bombs and chaos lies sarcasm of the blackest variety. Like many, Mei feels the chances of a major naval conflict with China actually taking place are laughable.
PHOTO COURTESY OF CHERNG PIIN GALLERY
This point is echoed by art critic and curator of the exhibition Jason Wang (王嘉驥), who, while not voicing his opinion on matters of national defense, does feel that the post-martial law era has seen a marked rise in the challenging of authority through the defamation of once sacred political and cultural icons.
Needless to say, deconstruction of such icons features largely in the exhibition. While Mei may be the only artist who dares to level the Presidential Office, the tongue-in-cheek concepts of annihilation and devastation take many forms: such as the comic belittlement of one of the nation's lesser known tourist spots.
Well-known for his Recover the Mainland series, in which he superimposed his own photographic image into shots of several of China's leading tourist attractions, Yao Jui-chung (姚瑞中) has chosen an unusual ally in order to help him tackle the issue of destruction and armed conflict.
With the help of The Little Mermaid and an amusement park located in northern Taiwan, Yao ridicules true love in a commercial world that could come to an untimely and bloody end. The angelic aquatic mermaid is pictured rotting amid the ruins of the devastated amusement park.
Unlike Mei and Yao, artist Hung Tung-lu (洪東祿) has addressed the issue of decimation and defamation without the devastation. Hung isn't going to war with the PLA and is instead making viewers ponder social deterioration and changing values.
With the help of a host of Japanese cartoon characters including Street-Fighter, Chun-li, Sailor Moon, Lynn Minmay, and Evangelion Ayanami Rei, Hung makes viewers look twice at images normally taken for granted.
Slightly altered images of these X-Gen cultural icons have been superimposed over pictures of temples. Hung sees this as indicative of how mass produced items have replaced once solid religious values and truths.
There are contributions from four other artists, all of whom have their own highly personal styles. Works by Chen Chieh-jen (陳界仁), Lin Ju (林鉅), Hsia Yan (夏陽) and Kuo Chen-chang (郭振昌) may not be as hard hitting as those by the other artists, but they remain as sarcastic and as poignant as those of their peers.
Although From Iconoclasm to Neo-Iconolatry is not an exhibition that will appeal to all art lovers, those who enjoy black humor will find something to amuse themselves amongst the exhibits.
Art Notes:
What: rom Iconoclasm to Neo-Iconolatry (從反聖像到新聖像)
Where: Cherng Piin Gallery (誠品畫廊), B2, 245, Sec. 1, Tunhua S. Rd., Taipei (台北市敦化南路一段245號B2)
When: Until June 17
March 24 to March 30 When Yang Bing-yi (楊秉彝) needed a name for his new cooking oil shop in 1958, he first thought of honoring his previous employer, Heng Tai Fung (恆泰豐). The owner, Wang Yi-fu (王伊夫), had taken care of him over the previous 10 years, shortly after the native of Shanxi Province arrived in Taiwan in 1948 as a penniless 21 year old. His oil supplier was called Din Mei (鼎美), so he simply combined the names. Over the next decade, Yang and his wife Lai Pen-mei (賴盆妹) built up a booming business delivering oil to shops and
The Taipei Times last week reported that the Control Yuan said it had been “left with no choice” but to ask the Constitutional Court to rule on the constitutionality of the central government budget, which left it without a budget. Lost in the outrage over the cuts to defense and to the Constitutional Court were the cuts to the Control Yuan, whose operating budget was slashed by 96 percent. It is unable even to pay its utility bills, and in the press conference it convened on the issue, said that its department directors were paying out of pocket for gasoline
On March 13 President William Lai (賴清德) gave a national security speech noting the 20th year since the passing of China’s Anti-Secession Law (反分裂國家法) in March 2005 that laid the legal groundwork for an invasion of Taiwan. That law, and other subsequent ones, are merely political theater created by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to have something to point to so they can claim “we have to do it, it is the law.” The president’s speech was somber and said: “By its actions, China already satisfies the definition of a ‘foreign hostile force’ as provided in the Anti-Infiltration Act, which unlike
Mirror mirror on the wall, what’s the fairest Disney live-action remake of them all? Wait, mirror. Hold on a second. Maybe choosing from the likes of Alice in Wonderland (2010), Mulan (2020) and The Lion King (2019) isn’t such a good idea. Mirror, on second thought, what’s on Netflix? Even the most devoted fans would have to acknowledge that these have not been the most illustrious illustrations of Disney magic. At their best (Pete’s Dragon? Cinderella?) they breathe life into old classics that could use a little updating. At their worst, well, blue Will Smith. Given the rapacious rate of remakes in modern
RSS