Since Asian economies began to register double-digit growth beginning in the mid-1980s, economists have spent huge amounts of time and energy trying to explain the "Asian miracle." Forward-looking optimists embraced the Pacific Century hubris unconditionally and argued that the future belonged to the Asia-Pacific rim, both as a marketplace and as a manufacturing center.
But pessimists, most notably economist Paul Krugman, then of MIT but now at Princeton, argued that the Asian export machine would soon run out of steam.
In an article published in Foreign Affairs in 1994, Krugman said Asia's economic rise was not sustainable, because he saw no concurrent rise in productivity in the region. He concluded that most of the growth was attributable to increased input of cheap labor and capital.
The Asian financial crisis of 1997 made Krugman's assessments seem prophetic and inspired the Economist to dub him a "Nobel-bound economist."
In the debate over the future of Asia, Hong Kong-based contributing editor for Fortune Jim Rohwer's voice stands out as particularly authoritative.
Rohwer's book Asia Rising, published in 1995, was a solid piece of analytical journalism, which, despite its praise of Asia's economic machine, warned that the region's future may be hampered by the lack of much-needed institutional reforms.
Undaunted by the meltdown in 1997 that undermined the title of his previous book, Rohwer has now written a sequel -- Remade in America: How Asia Will Change Because America Boomed.
In this book, Rohwer remains as optimistic as ever on the future of Asia and believes that the Asian crisis was nothing but a small blip in the road toward an even greater future.
Rohwer was trained as an economist and lawyer and has worked as chief economist for investment bank CS First Boston in Hong Kong. As it happens, the book deals mainly with the Asian financial crisis, the regional recovery and how the crisis helped expunge excesses in investment across Asia. With the solitary exception of Singapore, Rohwer says corruption is widespread in Asia, including Mahathir Mohammed's Malaysia, of whom he clearly states he is no fan.
Rohwer, both in his previous book and in this one, is especially generous in stating his admiration for the Singaporean senior statesman Lee Kuan-yew (李光耀), whom he describes as the "most powerful intellect of any leader in the latter half of the 20th century."
The book also looks at the restructuring of Korea's massive chaebols, the Japanese economy and provides a slightly cursory analysis of the Taiwanese economy, including interviews with Stan Shih (施振榮) of Acer and KMT technocrat Yang Shih-chien (楊世緘).
The author is no stranger to Taiwan. In 1998, the domestic Central Bank held a press conference to deny the author's claim, put forth in his column in Fortune, that Taiwan may have kept Asian hedge funds, which wreaked havoc on the Thai Baht and other currencies, at bay by using the government's sophisticated currency controls. But his coverage of Taiwan is haphazard and generalized and fails to point out the problems that currently plague the country's banking system.
But overall, his analyses are well argued, and backed up with abundant numbers. The heavy emphasis on statistics, however, often weighs down the prose, with a typical page carrying up to 20 different figures. Such analytical acrobatics may impress fellow analysts but are likely to overwhelm lay readers.
The cumbersome analyses aside, Rohwer gives readers a fairly clear glance at corporate Asia and the thoughts that occupy the minds of the regional movers and shakers -- be they Lee Kuan-yew, or John Greenwood, the architect of the Hong Kong's renowned currency board system, or Margie Yang, a Harvard-educated head of a Hong Kong clothing firm.
A weakness in the book rests in its exclusive view of Asia through educated Asian entrepreneurs and leaders. Little attention is paid to average people, who were most affected by the Asian financial crisis. The lives of many of the poorest in countries such as Thailand and Indonesia were wrecked virtually overnight.
As an apt preface to the book's third chapter, Rohwer quotes the 19th century British thinker, John Stuart Mill. "Panics do not destroy capital; they merely reveal the extent to which it has been previously destroyed by its betrayal into hopelessly unproductive works."
Ironically, it is in Rohwer's previous book that he failed to detect those same "hopelessly unproductive works" that were ticking away like a timebomb until 1997.
Anyone courageous enough to write on a region as diverse and complex as Asia in one straight sweep opens himself up to broad criticism. Nonetheless, the book succeeds in explaining in considerable depth how Asia is remaking itself after the brutal wakeup call of 1997.
Tsering Namgyal covers finance and economics for the 'Taipei Times.'
In the March 9 edition of the Taipei Times a piece by Ninon Godefroy ran with the headine “The quiet, gentle rhythm of Taiwan.” It started with the line “Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention.” I laughed out loud at that. This was out of no disrespect for the author or the piece, which made some interesting analogies and good points about how both Din Tai Fung’s and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) meticulous attention to detail and quality are not quite up to
April 21 to April 27 Hsieh Er’s (謝娥) political fortunes were rising fast after she got out of jail and joined the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in December 1945. Not only did she hold key positions in various committees, she was elected the only woman on the Taipei City Council and headed to Nanjing in 1946 as the sole Taiwanese female representative to the National Constituent Assembly. With the support of first lady Soong May-ling (宋美齡), she started the Taipei Women’s Association and Taiwan Provincial Women’s Association, where she
It is one of the more remarkable facts of Taiwan history that it was never occupied or claimed by any of the numerous kingdoms of southern China — Han or otherwise — that lay just across the water from it. None of their brilliant ministers ever discovered that Taiwan was a “core interest” of the state whose annexation was “inevitable.” As Paul Kua notes in an excellent monograph laying out how the Portuguese gave Taiwan the name “Formosa,” the first Europeans to express an interest in occupying Taiwan were the Spanish. Tonio Andrade in his seminal work, How Taiwan Became Chinese,
Mongolian influencer Anudari Daarya looks effortlessly glamorous and carefree in her social media posts — but the classically trained pianist’s road to acceptance as a transgender artist has been anything but easy. She is one of a growing number of Mongolian LGBTQ youth challenging stereotypes and fighting for acceptance through media representation in the socially conservative country. LGBTQ Mongolians often hide their identities from their employers and colleagues for fear of discrimination, with a survey by the non-profit LGBT Centre Mongolia showing that only 20 percent of people felt comfortable coming out at work. Daarya, 25, said she has faced discrimination since she
RSS