With 31 artists from 20 countries set to participate in the upcoming Taipei Biennial, the city art scene is set to show its sophistication and diversity. And to let the global art community know that it's come a long way since hosting a more limited biennial in 1998.
Organized by the Taipei Fine Arts Museum, the festival will jump outside the limited East Asian scope of its predecessor, dubbed "Site of Desire." The effort of the Taipei museum to broaden and reach out has always been a goal of its management, which has continually pursued making the museum an international contender.
Acclaimed curator Jerome Sans from Paris and Taipei based Manray Hsu (徐文瑞) started to work on the project in February and have spent NT$24 million. Sans is the co-director of the Palais de Tokyo in Paris and adjunct curator at the Institute of Visual Arts in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. His coming on board was a much-anticipated blessing by local arts circles, especially since he contributed to the 1999 Venice Biennale. Hsu, on the other hand, is a local curator and art critic, a rising star who has nurtured the developing contemporary art scene in Taiwan.
PHOTO: TAIPEI FINE ARTS MUSEUM
The curators, a group of advisors from local arts circles, and the professional staff of the museum have worked together to select the 31 artists from around the globe. In general, they looked for artists that are futuristic and international in scope. Those who dare venture into technology, for example, are valued for their experimentation with the digital world.
The two curators finalized the theme of "The sky is the limit" in June. It's a wide open world under the sky and the implication is that there are all kinds of possibilities, infinite and boundless. The theme is tied into the timing of crossing into the new millennium. Curator Sans stressed the word hybrid in shaping a new world. The show will be small scale and intimate, yet it will also follow a theme of globalization.
The curators said that they want this occasion to be a forum to showcase the collective experiences of the participating artists and audiences. The sense of novelty is strong and the curators promised to "create a lab where actions and fantasies can be put into experimentation."
As the biennial attracts locals and foreign visitors alike, there is certain to be discussion about how such an event can serve to develop the Taiwan arts. Already people have questioned the residual impact of such a large-scale, costly venture in an attempt to determine its contribution to the growth of contemporary art in Taiwan, which is still not adequately developed, said Rita Chang (張元茜), independent curator and Taipei representative of Asia Culture Council.
Chang also pointed out that what's essential is that peripheral facilities have to be built to establish a sound environment for contemporary art, with the biennial serving as a catalyst.
Another benefit of the biennial is the increased media attention, as hundreds of arts writers and critics descend upon Taipei to cover the event. And what they will see is a more vibrant scene than a few years back. Venues such as the Washang Cultural District, an alternative space, have started putting together better exhibitions as support for contemporary art increases and can serve as side-stops for visitors to the biennial.
The Taipei Contemporary Art Museum is also scheduled to open early next year, which means debates and activities will abound this year to prepare for it. And the Taipei Fine Arts Museum itself will schedule two fascinating shows alongside the biennial. "Zero-in," curated by Chang, celebrates the new millennium and probes into the e-era, and "Taipei Chinese Chess" is a solo exhibition of Ren Rong, a Chinese artist using paper art and installation to make humanlike creatures that examine the relationship between nature and man.Participating artists
Candice Breitz (South Africa)
Hsia-fei Chang (Taiwan)
Shu-lea Cheang (Taiwan)
Loris Cecchini (Italy)
Claude Closky (France)
Meschac Gaba (Benin)
Kendell Geers (South Africa)
Gim Hongsok (South Korea)
Hanayo (Japan)
Hung Dung-lu (Taiwan)
Kim Soo-ja (South Korea)
Surasi Kusolwong (Thailand)
Kyupi Kyupi (Japan)
Lee Ming-wei (Taiwan)
Mark Lewis (Canada)
Michael Lin (Taiwan)
Liza Lou (USA)
Michel Majerus (Germany)
Jonathan Monk (United Kingdom)
Daniel Pflumm (Germany)
Henrik Plenge Jakobsen (Denmark)
Navin Rawanchaikul (Thailand)
Tobias Rehberger (Germany)
Sidney Stucki (Switzerland)
Pascale Marthine Tayou (Cameroon)
Uri Tzaig (Israel)
Wang Du (China)
Wang Jun-jieh (Taiwan)
Wang You-shen (China)
Erwin Wurm (Austria)
Jun'ya Yamaide (Japan)
The entire saga involving the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and its Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) continues to produce plot twists at such a rapid pace that fiction publishers would throw it out for being ridiculously improbable. This past week was particularly bizarre, but surprisingly the press has almost entirely ignored a big story that could have serious national security implications and instead focused on a series of salacious bombshell allegations. Ko is currently being held incommunicado by prosecutors while several criminal investigations are ongoing on allegations of bribery and stealing campaign funds. This last week for reasons unknown Ko completely shaved
The self-destructive protest vote in January that put the pro-People’s Republic of China (PRC) side in control of the legislature continues to be a gift that just keeps on giving to the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Last week legislation was introduced by KMT Legislator Weng Hsiao-lin (翁曉玲) that would amend Article 9-3 of the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例) to permit retired and serving (!) military personnel to participate in “united front” (統戰) activities. Since the purpose of those activities is to promote annexation of Taiwan to the PRC, legislators
Nov. 18 to Nov. 24 Led by a headman named Dika, 16 indigenous Siraya from Sinkan Village, in what is today’s Tainan, traveled to Japan and met with the shogun in the summer of 1627. They reportedly offered sovereignty to the emperor. This greatly alarmed the Dutch, who were allies of the village. They had set up headquarters on land purchased from the Sinkan two years earlier and protected the community from aggressive actions by their more powerful rivals from Mattau Village. The Dutch East India Company (VOC) had been embroiled in a bitter trade dispute with Japan, and they believed
Anyone who has been to Alishan (阿里山) is familiar with the railroad there: one line comes up from Chiayi City past the sacred tree site, while another line goes up to the sunrise viewing platform at Zhushan (祝山). Of course, as a center of logging operations for over 60 years, Alishan did have more rail lines in the past. Are any of these still around? Are they easily accessible? Are they worth visiting? The answer to all three of these questions is emphatically: Yes! One of these lines ran from Alishan all the way up to the base of Jade Mountain. Its
RSS