With 31 artists from 20 countries set to participate in the upcoming Taipei Biennial, the city art scene is set to show its sophistication and diversity. And to let the global art community know that it's come a long way since hosting a more limited biennial in 1998.
Organized by the Taipei Fine Arts Museum, the festival will jump outside the limited East Asian scope of its predecessor, dubbed "Site of Desire." The effort of the Taipei museum to broaden and reach out has always been a goal of its management, which has continually pursued making the museum an international contender.
Acclaimed curator Jerome Sans from Paris and Taipei based Manray Hsu (徐文瑞) started to work on the project in February and have spent NT$24 million. Sans is the co-director of the Palais de Tokyo in Paris and adjunct curator at the Institute of Visual Arts in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. His coming on board was a much-anticipated blessing by local arts circles, especially since he contributed to the 1999 Venice Biennale. Hsu, on the other hand, is a local curator and art critic, a rising star who has nurtured the developing contemporary art scene in Taiwan.
PHOTO: TAIPEI FINE ARTS MUSEUM
The curators, a group of advisors from local arts circles, and the professional staff of the museum have worked together to select the 31 artists from around the globe. In general, they looked for artists that are futuristic and international in scope. Those who dare venture into technology, for example, are valued for their experimentation with the digital world.
The two curators finalized the theme of "The sky is the limit" in June. It's a wide open world under the sky and the implication is that there are all kinds of possibilities, infinite and boundless. The theme is tied into the timing of crossing into the new millennium. Curator Sans stressed the word hybrid in shaping a new world. The show will be small scale and intimate, yet it will also follow a theme of globalization.
The curators said that they want this occasion to be a forum to showcase the collective experiences of the participating artists and audiences. The sense of novelty is strong and the curators promised to "create a lab where actions and fantasies can be put into experimentation."
As the biennial attracts locals and foreign visitors alike, there is certain to be discussion about how such an event can serve to develop the Taiwan arts. Already people have questioned the residual impact of such a large-scale, costly venture in an attempt to determine its contribution to the growth of contemporary art in Taiwan, which is still not adequately developed, said Rita Chang (張元茜), independent curator and Taipei representative of Asia Culture Council.
Chang also pointed out that what's essential is that peripheral facilities have to be built to establish a sound environment for contemporary art, with the biennial serving as a catalyst.
Another benefit of the biennial is the increased media attention, as hundreds of arts writers and critics descend upon Taipei to cover the event. And what they will see is a more vibrant scene than a few years back. Venues such as the Washang Cultural District, an alternative space, have started putting together better exhibitions as support for contemporary art increases and can serve as side-stops for visitors to the biennial.
The Taipei Contemporary Art Museum is also scheduled to open early next year, which means debates and activities will abound this year to prepare for it. And the Taipei Fine Arts Museum itself will schedule two fascinating shows alongside the biennial. "Zero-in," curated by Chang, celebrates the new millennium and probes into the e-era, and "Taipei Chinese Chess" is a solo exhibition of Ren Rong, a Chinese artist using paper art and installation to make humanlike creatures that examine the relationship between nature and man.Participating artists
Candice Breitz (South Africa)
Hsia-fei Chang (Taiwan)
Shu-lea Cheang (Taiwan)
Loris Cecchini (Italy)
Claude Closky (France)
Meschac Gaba (Benin)
Kendell Geers (South Africa)
Gim Hongsok (South Korea)
Hanayo (Japan)
Hung Dung-lu (Taiwan)
Kim Soo-ja (South Korea)
Surasi Kusolwong (Thailand)
Kyupi Kyupi (Japan)
Lee Ming-wei (Taiwan)
Mark Lewis (Canada)
Michael Lin (Taiwan)
Liza Lou (USA)
Michel Majerus (Germany)
Jonathan Monk (United Kingdom)
Daniel Pflumm (Germany)
Henrik Plenge Jakobsen (Denmark)
Navin Rawanchaikul (Thailand)
Tobias Rehberger (Germany)
Sidney Stucki (Switzerland)
Pascale Marthine Tayou (Cameroon)
Uri Tzaig (Israel)
Wang Du (China)
Wang Jun-jieh (Taiwan)
Wang You-shen (China)
Erwin Wurm (Austria)
Jun'ya Yamaide (Japan)
Oct. 27 to Nov. 2 Over a breakfast of soymilk and fried dough costing less than NT$400, seven officials and engineers agreed on a NT$400 million plan — unaware that it would mark the beginning of Taiwan’s semiconductor empire. It was a cold February morning in 1974. Gathered at the unassuming shop were Economics minister Sun Yun-hsuan (孫運璿), director-general of Transportation and Communications Kao Yu-shu (高玉樹), Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) president Wang Chao-chen (王兆振), Telecommunications Laboratories director Kang Pao-huang (康寶煌), Executive Yuan secretary-general Fei Hua (費驊), director-general of Telecommunications Fang Hsien-chi (方賢齊) and Radio Corporation of America (RCA) Laboratories director Pan
The classic warmth of a good old-fashioned izakaya beckons you in, all cozy nooks and dark wood finishes, as tables order a third round and waiters sling tapas-sized bites and assorted — sometimes unidentifiable — skewered meats. But there’s a romantic hush about this Ximending (西門町) hotspot, with cocktails savored, plating elegant and never rushed and daters and diners lit by candlelight and chandelier. Each chair is mismatched and the assorted tables appear to be the fanciest picks from a nearby flea market. A naked sewing mannequin stands in a dimly lit corner, adorned with antique mirrors and draped foliage
The consensus on the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chair race is that Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) ran a populist, ideological back-to-basics campaign and soundly defeated former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), the candidate backed by the big institutional players. Cheng tapped into a wave of popular enthusiasm within the KMT, while the institutional players’ get-out-the-vote abilities fell flat, suggesting their power has weakened significantly. Yet, a closer look at the race paints a more complicated picture, raising questions about some analysts’ conclusions, including my own. TURNOUT Here is a surprising statistic: Turnout was 130,678, or 39.46 percent of the 331,145 eligible party
The election of Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) as chair of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) marked a triumphant return of pride in the “Chinese” in the party name. Cheng wants Taiwanese to be proud to call themselves Chinese again. The unambiguous winner was a return to the KMT ideology that formed in the early 2000s under then chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) put into practice as far as he could, until ultimately thwarted by hundreds of thousands of protestors thronging the streets in what became known as the Sunflower movement in 2014. Cheng is an unambiguous Chinese ethnonationalist,