Beijing’s suppression of Taiwanese leaders’ overseas engagements is neither new nor partisan. In 1995, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) was prevented from continuing a Middle East trip to Israel after pressure from Beijing. In 1997, then-vice president Lien Chan (連戰) had his European itinerary to Spain curtailed. In 2002, then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was blocked from entering Indonesia. Different leaders and administrations have faced the same issue: Taiwan’s international presence has been restricted regardless of who held office in Taipei.
President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled visit to Eswatini is the latest example of a long-term pattern. Beijing continues to project coercive power beyond its borders by pressuring third countries to restrict Taiwan’s external engagement and, through repeated obstruction, limit the ability of Taiwan’s elected leaders to travel internationally.
What matters is less the disruption itself than the model of coercion it represents. Beijing does not need to block Taiwan’s leaders directly to suffocate the nation’s international space; instead, it could make exclusion appear procedural rather than political. That blurs the line between sovereign choice and external pressure and makes intimidation easier to normalize and more corrosive to international rules.
The Legislative Yuan framed the incident as a matter of international norms rather than cross-strait politics. The legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee passed a Democratic Progressive Party-proposed motion, which Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators did not sign but did not object to, condemning Beijing for coercing third countries into revoking overflight permissions.
Such conduct contravened sovereign equality and non-interference under the UN Charter, the prohibition on coercive intervention in UN General Assembly Resolution 2625, undermined the non-discrimination principle in the Chicago Convention and ran against transit protections under Article 40 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, the motion said. It also called on the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to raise the issue through diplomatic channels and international mechanisms, including the International Civil Aviation Organization. International reactions indicate growing convergence among democratic allies, increasingly framing Taiwan as a test case for indirect authoritarian coercion.
Taiwan has no room for defeatism, yet maintaining its international presence has grown more demanding. What might look like a speech or nominal visit often reflects careful negotiation and efforts to navigate external pressure.
Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim’s (蕭美琴) appearance in Brussels for the annual summit of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China in November last year and Premier Cho Jung-tai’s (卓榮泰) trip to the Tokyo Dome for the World Baseball Classic match last month should be seen in that light. Their significance lies less in the settings than in the fact such appearances remain possible.
More broadly, this pattern carries implications beyond Taiwan. Lai’s visit highlights how coercion operates indirectly, incrementally and through systems that present themselves as neutral. If the international community becomes accustomed to third countries being pressured into restricting elected leaders’ movement, the erosion would not be confined to one case or country.
Taiwan might be the first to experience such pressure but what is being tested is the resilience of a wider rules-based order. The norms at stake are global.
Gahon Chiang is a congressional staff member in the office of Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chen Kuan-ting, focusing on Taiwan’s national security policy.
In late January, Taiwan’s first indigenous submarine, the Hai Kun (海鯤, or Narwhal), completed its first submerged dive, reaching a depth of roughly 50m during trials in the waters off Kaohsiung. By March, it had managed a fifth dive, still well short of the deep-water and endurance tests required before the navy could accept the vessel. The original delivery deadline of November last year passed months ago. CSBC Corp, Taiwan, the lead contractor, now targets June and the Ministry of National Defense is levying daily penalties for every day the submarine remains unfinished. The Hai Kun was supposed to be
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
Most schoolchildren learn that the circumference of the Earth is about 40,000km. They do not learn that the global economy depends on just 160 of those kilometers. Blocking two narrow waterways — the Strait of Hormuz and the Taiwan Strait — could send the economy back in time, if not to the Stone Age that US President Donald Trump has been threatening to bomb Iran back to, then at least to the mid-20th century, before the Rolling Stones first hit the airwaves. Over the past month and a half, Iran has turned the Strait of Hormuz, which is about 39km wide at
The ongoing Middle East crisis has reinforced an uncomfortable truth for Taiwan: In an increasingly interconnected and volatile world, distant wars rarely remain distant. What began as a regional confrontation between the US, Israel and Iran has evolved into a strategic shock wave reverberating far beyond the Persian Gulf. For Taiwan, the consequences are immediate, material and deeply unsettling. From Taipei’s perspective, the conflict has exposed two vulnerabilities — Taiwan’s dependence on imported energy and the risks created when Washington’s military attention is diverted. Together, they offer a preview of the pressures Taiwan might increasingly face in an era of overlapping geopolitical
RSS