Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家) sparked a heated debate during his acceptance speech for an honorary doctorate at Taichung’s Asia University when he dismissed Chinese robots as “useless” and “just for show.” Some commenters said that no one should underestimate Chinese robots, while others said the core of robotics technology resides elsewhere.
What Wei was referring to were the humanoid robots dancing and performing backflips and martial arts over the Lunar New Year holiday. The movements were surprisingly smooth and balanced. However, the key to useful robots relies on semiconductor technology, he said. TSMC manufactures 95 percent of advanced chips, which help autonomous machines detect light and temperature, collect other information and enable smooth operations, he said.
Indeed, a robot without advanced semiconductors is useless. Although it can move, it cannot think or react to external stimuli, and that is the difference between a robot and a machine. Currently, humanoid robots in China operate in a way that is planned by programmers, who capture human movements, store the data and then train the robots. A more accurate description of China’s robots would be that even though they are bipedal, they are still machines performing routines. Turning humanoid robots into a productive workforce in factories still faces many hurdles and few such robots are deployed on production lines.
Even so, humanoid robots represent a critical competitive frontier among global powers, alongside advanced semiconductors and artificial intelligence (AI), due to their transformative impact on the economy. China already exhibits strong manufacturing capabilities in mechanical and electronic components essential for humanoid robots, excluding advanced logic chips. Last year, global shipments of humanoid robots surpassed 14,500 units, with China accounting for 90 percent of total sales led by Unitree Robotics and AgiBot, industry statistics showed.
It remains unclear whether a profitable business model for humanoid robots exists, as shipments do not tell the whole story. In addition, what matters to firms are robots that can make their operations more efficient with fewer risks in the workplace. What most companies do not need are robots that can dance and do backflips. While early deployments of humanoid robots would largely be for entertainment, research and industrial purposes, their applications could break into wider retail and household tasks, as well as military applications. What Wei stressed in his speech was the increasing demand for AI and robots for long-term care.
As Taiwan becomes an aging society, every household might need robots, which do not sleep, eat, or get angry and tired taking care of others, Wei said. Those robots would addresses the dilemma facing Taiwan: a declining and aging population. However, the difficulty of creating robots truly capable of caring for people far exceeds most people’s imagination, as it needs optical sensors to identify the environment and location, pressure sensors to set force boundaries, and temperature sensors to distinguish between hot and cold, he said. All these signals would be transmitted in real-time to a computing core to perform corresponding actions and ensure that humans are not harmed, he said.
A bigger challenge is that robots operate on digital logic, and making their movements resemble human movements requires extensive microelectromechanical systems to bridge the gap. However, the key to truly usable robots lies in reliability, and the yield rate and stability of semiconductors directly affect robots’ “brains” and determine whether they can perform caregiving tasks, Wei said.
At the end of his speech, Wei drew laughter and applause when he said he hoped to use robots soon and that the chips inside would all be made by TSMC, because the reliability of its components cannot be overlooked. The TSMC head used humor to express his thoughts about aging, caregiving, robots and semiconductors. The speech was insightful, as Wei set a vision for the audience that humanoid robots would have a role in Taiwan’s future. However, the technology is not yet ready, and making robots as skilled as humans is expensive, while their reliability and stability remain questionable. Wei did not promise that success would happen overnight; he just reminded us how much effort and commitment are needed to achieve it.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
Taiwan no longer wants to merely manufacture the chips that power artificial intelligence (AI). It aims to build the software, platforms and services that run on them. Ten major AI infrastructure projects, a national cloud computing center in Tainan, the sovereign language model Trustworthy AI Dialogue Engine, five targeted industry verticals — from precision medicine to smart agriculture — and the goal of ranking among the world’s top five in computing power by 2040: The roadmap from “Silicon Island” to “Smart Island” is drawn. The question is whether the western plains, where population, industry and farmland are concentrated, have the water and
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
RSS