Today marks the 30th anniversary of Taiwan’s first direct presidential election. This year also marks a broader democratic milestone, as the years Taiwan has spent as a free nation have now exceeded the years it endured under martial law. Taiwan’s democracy remains a living project, still growing stronger and deeper with time. That progress belongs to Taiwanese, and it gives this generation a clear duty to protect the peace and security that sustain it.
Taiwan’s democracy did not emerge fully formed; it was built through social struggle, political reform and the steady expansion of public participation. Direct presidential elections gave Taiwanese the power to choose their leader, while the end of the authoritarian era allowed democratic institutions to take root in everyday life. Today, these hard-won gains shape how Taiwan governs itself, how Taiwanese debate public affairs and how power is held accountable.
That democratic development carries a practical lesson — freedom requires protection. Democratic institutions need a secure environment in which to function. A society that values open elections, civil liberties and a constitutional government must also take national defense seriously. After all, Taiwan faces ongoing military pressure and “gray zone” coercion from China. Under these conditions, preserving peace depends on maintaining credible defense capacity. Stability does not come from wishful thinking; it rests on preparedness, resilience and the ability to deter aggression.
National defense is essential to Taiwan’s democratic survival. In his first term as chair of the Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee, the first item Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chen Kuan-ting (陳冠廷) placed on the agenda was a review of the special defense bill. That choice sent a clear signal. As Taiwan’s democracy continues to deepen, strengthening defense readiness remains a serious political priority.
Moreover, that signal matters internationally. Taiwan’s partners watch closely for signs of political seriousness and strategic consistency. Beijing watches for signs of hesitation, division and drift. The legislature’s agenda therefore carries meaning beyond domestic politics. Safeguarding democracy requires investment, planning and resolve. Consequently, that message bolsters deterrence and reassures those who support Taiwan that its democratic system is capable of acting with purpose.
Legislative oversight is an essential part of democratic governance. Defense budgets should be reviewed seriously, with careful attention to strategic priorities, implementation timelines and the responsible use of public funds. However, oversight should not be turned into performative obstruction. What Taiwan needs is substantive scrutiny that strengthens national defense, not meaningless political blocking that delays urgent preparations and weakens the signal Taiwan sends to the outside world.
Looking back, 30 years after the first direct presidential election, Taiwan has every reason to take pride in how far it has come. It has built a democracy that is open, competitive and resilient. More broadly, it has entered a new stage in which the years of freedom now outweigh the years of authoritarian control. That achievement should inspire confidence, but also vigilance. A democracy that continues to grow must also continue to defend itself.
Taiwan’s democratic story is still being written. Protecting that story requires more than remembrance. It requires the will to preserve peace through strength, to defend democratic institutions through preparedness and to act with clarity when national security is on the line.
Gahon Chiang is a congressional staff member in the office of DPP Legislator Chen Kuan-ting, focusing on Taiwan’s national security policy.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
RSS