If the People’s Republic of China (PRC) democratized and the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan was still an authoritarian country, it would be understandable that members of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — who supported the imposition of martial law by former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) — changed their stance from being against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to supporting it, and opposed Taiwan being occupied and ruled by the ROC’s party-state system. After 1949, the KMT controlled the history of the ROC, which would mean the political progress made between 1945 and 2000 would become meaningless.
However, this is not the case. The PRC has not democratized. The global democratic front’s attempt to contain Russia by cooperating with China has failed. China and Russia remain the roots of an unstable global political order.
Going down a capitalist road, despite bolstering China’s economy to a certain extent, has not brought true happiness to the Chinese. The authoritarian regime has forced many to flee to free and democratic countries in Europe and the US.
The Tiananmen Square Massacre on June 4, 1989, confirmed that the PRC is anti-democratic. As the world’s factory, China has become a market economy, which does not sit well with its communist ideology. With its vast territory and huge population, China has become a capitalist country with the second-largest economy in the world. However, its domineering approach has raised concerns, which in turn has impeded its development.
In the late 1990s, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) promoted a “no haste, be patient” policy on investing in China. His advice was ignored by the business community, allowing China to become stronger economically and intensifying its threat against Taiwan. Now that the world has boycotted China for its ambition and its poor investment environment, Taiwan’s business community has gradually retreated from the Chinese market.
Following Taiwan’s democratization, the KMT no longer has the privileges it once had in the party-state era. Why would it expect something good from the PRC? Is it just because the Democratic Progressive Party is a rival and an enemy of the CCP? Does the KMT believe that an enemy’s enemy is a friend? Or does it wish to be exonerated from occupying Taiwan and being anti-CCP in the past?
If China was a democratic country that did not want to annex Taiwan, Taipei would be friendly to Beijing. Taiwan is one of the countries that are in the Han cultural sphere and writes using Chinese characters. It could have developed its own language, just as Japan and South Korea did.
Taiwan should build its own country in East Asia that is not subordinate to China. This is how the world should work, not the other way around — turning the world into a part of China. The Yuan Dynasty and the Qing Dynasty ruled China. Their territories were regarded as part of China. This is not the case for Japan, North Korea, South Korea and Taiwan.
If China was a normal country, an independent Taiwan could have diplomatic relations with it. Citizens of the two countries could have normal exchanges. The two countries would not have to bolster their invasive or defensive military capabilities. This would create peace and development opportunities in the Asia-Pacific region.
Before Chiang Kai-shek’s representatives were removed from the UN following the passage of UN Resolution 2758 in 1971, which recognized the PRC as “the only legitimate representatives of China in the UN,” intellectuals, who were waishengren (外省人) — mainlanders who fled to Taiwan with the KMT after the Chinese Civil War — had thought about preserving Taiwan by establishing a “Chinese Republic of Taiwan.” This historical event is worth reflecting on.
Some ROC citizens deliberately mix up the term “Chinese” with “PRC citizens” to create a confusing national identity. This is not just political, but also cultural. It contributes to the CCP’s ambition to annihilate the ROC. It does more harm than good to PRC citizens. It manifests the ugly side of these fence-sitters.
People in this country are “Taiwanese,” “Taiwanese of the ROC” and “ROC citizens.” Taiwan is to remain Taiwan until a consensus is reached, to avoid infringing on the rights of the PRC or being mixed up with it.
I look forward to constructive developments in Taiwan’s nationbuilding as democratization progresses. I also look forward to China putting an end to the CCP’s one-party dictatorship and developing into a democratic country.
However, it now looks like the Democratic Party in Hong Kong is to disband, putting an end to the territory’s road to democracy over the past 30 years. The democratization of China remains a distant hope.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Fion Khan
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS