A non-native teacher’s voice
The “Bilingual 2030” policy is an ambitious step by a non-native English-speaking country to embrace the language and compete globally. The policy not only brings challenges, but also new opportunities, especially for voices such as mine.
I am a student at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages. When I came to Taiwan from Indonesia, a friend recommended me a job as a part-time English teacher in a cram school.
As I taught more students, from elementary school to junior high, I realized that my strength was not just language ability, but also understanding what it feels like to learn English. I did not just teach vocabulary and grammar. I focused on building their confidence.
Many of my students perform well in reading, listening and writing. However, when it comes to speaking, they struggle a lot. They are used to textbook English, so when they are asked something slightly different, they get confused. I once asked a student, “How are you today?” and the answer I got was, “Today is Friday!” After class, I later learned that the word “today” confuses them, since they are more familiar with the question, “How are you?” It was a small moment, but it made me realize that students are trained to recognize sentence patterns, not to communicate naturally.
Another time, students gave me perfect answers on a written test, but froze during the oral test.
The fear of making mistakes slowed them down. That is why I focus on building their speaking confidence first. Not perfect grammar, not fancy vocabulary, just the courage to try. I became the teacher I wish I had growing up.
Their struggle to speak reminded me of my own journey learning English in Indonesia, and probably reflects what many non-native English teachers in Taiwan have experienced, too. I realized that shared experience is our strength as a teacher. We know how it feels to struggle with English and it gives us the tools to guide others with empathy and patience.
Despite my journey, I have still felt underestimated, simply because I am not a native speaker. Many schools and cram schools still prefer Western teachers, often based on their appearance. Friends of mine who are also non-native English teachers have shared similar experiences. We, as non-native English speakers, have walked the path our students are walking. That matters.
While taking a “Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages” course, the instructor asked: “Do you think someone who speaks the language can definitively teach the language?” That question stayed with me. My answer is, not always. Teaching takes more than fluency, it requires understanding, compassion, strategy and heart.
If Taiwan truly wants to become a bilingual country by 2030, it is time to recognize that the journey of learning can be just as valuable as fluency itself. Non-native English teachers could bring more than language skills, they also have studying experience. We do not just speak English, we have learned it and grown with it, just like what our students are expected to do.
Jocelyn Gaby
Kaohsiung
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
RSS