In an era of gray zone conflicts, information warfare and escalating geopolitical tensions, the security challenges we face are no longer confined to traditional military confrontations. From Chinese military aircraft surrounding Taiwan, espionage and infiltration, disinformation campaigns, and the conflicts in Ukraine and Middle East, to US-China tech and tariff wars, and the economic risks that come with supply chain issues — national security has long permeated our daily lives.
Although the Ministry of National Defense published the All-Out Defense Contingency Handbook (全民國防應變手冊), higher education curriculums still lack a systemic understanding of and proper training on national security and risk literacy.
Over the past few years, there have been multiple espionage cases involving the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), exposing deep and diversified infiltration methods across various sectors. We have also witnessed Chinese People’s Liberation Army military exercises, as the CCP continuously harasses the maritime territories and airspace surrounding Taiwan. The Internet has become the primary stage for manipulating public discourse and sowing social division — from COVID-19 pandemic rumors and “united front” election interference to economic sanctions and supply chain vulnerabilities — all those issues highlight the public’s inability to identify risks and form collective responses.
When faced with such a high-risk environment, the role of education is increasingly vital. We must have modern citizens who possess risk identification skills and information literacy, and understand their civic responsibilities — technical expertise based on academic knowledge alone is not enough. Awareness of national and territorial security, and risk literacy should be integrated into the core competencies of higher-education curriculums as soon as possible.
General education courses at universities should cover interdisciplinary topics such as cognitive warfare, information security, information analysis, economic resilience and civic responsibility.
At the same time, case studies could be integrated to offer simulations and scenario-based teaching, addressing topics such as natural disasters, man-made incidents, risks to critical infrastructure and response strategies — it could also include simulations for responding to tariffs.
Teaching resources should be integrated and faculty training bolstered, so students could develop risk awareness through case discussions and public participation.
National security has never been exclusive to the military or government — it inseparable from the lives of every citizen. Cultivating a generation of youth who are able to think critically, identify threats, and respond in a calm and collected manner is the foundation for defending our democratic society.
In the wake of diversifying and increasingly complex national security threats, general education should focus on more than just cultural appreciation and philosophical reflection — it must become the first line of defense for Taiwan’s national resilience.
Tsai Yu-ming is an assistant professor in the School of Liberal Education at Shih Chien University.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
You wish every Taiwanese spoke English like I do. I was not born an anglophone, yet I am paid to write and speak in English. It is my working language and my primary idiom in private. I am more than bilingual: I think in English; it is my language now. Can you guess how many native English speakers I had as teachers in my entire life? Zero. I only lived in an English-speaking country, Australia, in my 30s, and it was because I was already fluent that I was able to live and pursue a career. English became my main language during adulthood
Somehow, US intelligence identified “the Houthis’ top missile guy” and pinpointed his exact location. At 1348 hours (Washington time), March 15, President Trump’s national security advisor Mike Waltz texted, “positive ID of him walking into his girlfriend’s building.” The unsuspecting Romeo entered. High above, the drone monitoring the building registered a flash. When the smoke cleared, Mr. Waltz texted, “…And it’s now collapsed.” RIP. The star-crossed “top missile guy” had been target number one in the now uproarious US Navy bombing campaign on that Sunday against the Yemeni rebels who have been holding the Red Sea hostage since October 19,
Taiwan on Monday celebrated Freedom of Speech Day. The commemoration is not an international day, and was first established in Tainan by President William Lai (賴清德) in 2012, when he was mayor of that city. The day was elevated to a national holiday in 2016 by then-president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文). Lai chose April 7, because it marks the anniversary of the death of democracy advocate Deng Nan-jung (鄭南榕), who started Freedom Era Weekly to promote freedom of expression. Thirty-six years ago, a warrant for Deng’s arrest had been issued after he refused to appear in court to answer charges of
The Opinion page has published several articles and editorials over the past few weeks addressing Taiwan’s efforts to leverage unique or strong aspects of its culture to increase international awareness of the nation. These have included submissions by foreign journalists and overseas students, highlighting how bubble milk tea, Guinness World Record attempts, the entertainment sectors, impressive scenery, world-class cuisine and important contributions to the high-tech supply chain can enhance Taiwan’s recognition overseas and therefore its soft power. That entails competing for attention in already crowded sectors. Other nations, after all, offer popular entertainment exports, beautiful scenic spots and great food.
RSS