In the late 19th century, US cities were dark. Gas lamps flickered in homes and along streets, while coal-fired engines powered industry and steam propelled trains. Then the race to electrify the country began — a fierce competition between Thomas Edison, Nikola Tesla and George Westinghouse that ultimately redefined modern life. Today, we stand on the cusp of a similarly momentous energy transformation, powered by fusion energy. However, this time it is a competition between countries, not innovators, that would make all the difference.
Electrification did not happen overnight, nor was it inevitable. It was made possible by a mix of private innovation, government investment and national ambition. Once the US committed to it, the process became unstoppable. As factories, businesses and homes were electrified, a new era of US dominance dawned.
Likewise, the race to harness fusion energy is not only about scientific discovery; it is about who would dominate the future of energy. If the US leads, fusion power plants could provide abundant, clean and safe energy for generations of Americans, breaking the country’s dependence on fossil fuels and insulating it from global energy shocks. If the US fails to meet this moment, it would find itself buying fusion machines from China, just as it now imports Chinese solar panels, electric-vehicle (EV) batteries and rare-earth minerals.
Fusion — when two light atoms fuse to form a new, heavier atom, releasing a huge amount of energy — moved to the forefront of the global energy transition only recently. For decades, it was viewed as a grand but remote scientific ambition. While researchers made slow but steady progress in replicating the reactions that power the sun and stars, harnessing them to produce limitless, carbon-free power seemed to be a distant dream.
An inflection point came in 2022, when scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory’s National Ignition Facility achieved a controlled fusion reaction that produced more energy than it consumed, proving that fusion power is theoretically possible and within reach. Now, researchers are doing more than running experiments; they are laying the groundwork for real power-generation systems.
The race to harness fusion energy would be decided not by physics, but by engineering, infrastructure and industrial capacity. The first country to bring fusion power to the grid, not the first to achieve fusion reactions in a lab, would decide how the world’s next great power source is deployed and dominate a potential multi-trillion-dollar industry, reshaping its own economy in the process.
There was a time when the US set the pace for every major technological revolution. It built the first light bulbs, the first airplanes, the first computers and put a man on the moon, but it is China that is moving aggressively to win the fusion race, investing heavily in research and development, and positioning itself to control the supply chains that would enable large-scale fusion deployment. Chinese laboratories have already set records in sustaining fusion reactions, and state-backed initiatives are seeking to secure control over tritium, one of the fuels that would power future reactors. The US is falling behind.
We have seen this pattern before — first with solar panels, then with batteries and now with EVs. In each case, US innovation laid the foundation for new industries, but it was China that implemented a long-term strategy aimed at cementing its dominance over manufacturing and supply chains. In each case, the US ended up dependent on foreign production.
When it comes to fusion, the stakes are even higher. The ability to generate near-limitless energy would amount to a strategic advantage rivaling the greatest breakthroughs of the twentieth century. Beyond acquiring powerful economic leverage over the US, a China that leads in fusion would gain considerable geopolitical clout. If China also leads in artificial intelligence, quantum computing and advanced manufacturing — as it is positioning itself to do — its influence would be unmatched.
US policymakers are well aware of the risks a dominant China would pose, as reflected in recent national security strategies, and economic and foreign policies. They also know that energy independence is critical to US security; it has been a priority for decades. However, they have yet to recognize the critical importance of leading on fusion. This must change — and fast.
Harnessing fusion energy is not a challenge for the next presidential administration or even the next US Congress. The decisions the US makes in the next five years would determine whether it wins the fusion race — or watches others run away with the prize.
Ylli Bajraktari, a former chief of staff to the US National Security Adviser and a former executive director of the US National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence, is CEO of the Special Competitive Studies Project.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
Deflation in China is persisting, raising growing concerns domestically and internationally. Beijing’s stimulus policies introduced in September last year have largely been short-lived in financial markets and negligible in the real economy. Recent data showing disproportionately low bank loan growth relative to the expansion of the money supply suggest the limited effectiveness of the measures. Many have urged the government to take more decisive action, particularly through fiscal expansion, to avoid a deep deflationary spiral akin to Japan’s experience in the early 1990s. While Beijing’s policy choices remain uncertain, questions abound about the possible endgame for the Chinese economy if no decisive
Actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) on March 13 posted an Instagram caption after the opening of Tiffany’s Taipei flagship store two days earlier that read: “Thank you Tiffany for inviting us to Taipei China.” We know that Yeoh knows Taipei is in Taiwan, not China, because the caption was posted following comments she made — in English — in which she said: “Thank you to Tiffany for bringing me to Taipei, because I do love this country very much.” Her remarks and the subsequent Instagram caption were reported in Taiwan, in Chinese and English- language media such as Radio Free Asia, and overseas,
China poses a dire threat to Taiwan’s semiconductor industry as it steps up efforts to poach Taiwan’s top chip talent, following the US’ implementation of stringent chip restrictions. Beijing is keen to develop its own semiconductor technologies, leveraging skilled engineers from Taiwan, Europe and other countries to circumvent US restrictions on providing China access to advanced US chips, particularly those used in artificial intelligence applications, as well as other chip technologies and manufacturing equipment. Taiwan has always contended with talent competition from China, but the situation is worsening. The Hsinchu District Prosecutors’ Office on Friday said that China’s ARK Semi and
RSS