After the real-estate bubble burst, China’s purchasing power disappeared with it, and all its industries fell into a vicious cycle of price competition. Due to insufficient domestic demand, China has had to rely on exports to boost its GDP. As a result, its exports have grown rapidly in the past few years, turning a domestic problem into an international one.
Since the US-China tariff dispute, first triggered by US President Donald Trump in 2018 during his first term in office, China has taken measures such as relocating production lines overseas, which has not prevented exports from falling, but has instead led to a rapid increase.
China’s exports have grown significantly since then by more than US$150 billion each year, but imports have only increased slightly by about US$15 billion. The trade surplus continued to rise.
If that trend continues, China’s manufacturing industry might account for 42 percent of the world’s total by 2030. That would not only be unbearable for the US, but would also considerably affect Europe and Japan.
That is the issue the Trump 2.0 tariff campaign aims to address — by forcing China to drop export subsidies and stop externalizing its domestic economic problems — to create a healthier global trade environment.
During Trump’s first term, the tariff dispute targeted only China. Although many problems arose during its implementation, it was quite effective in curbing China.
However, Trump’s current tariff efforts have spread too wide and involve too many countries, especially the global “reciprocal tariff” plan that is to be announced today.
That plan would be difficult to implement, because it is too complicated and losing focus, which would give China a break, further worsening the global economic and trade environment, and even worse, offending many US allies.
During his first term, Trump raised tariffs on China from 3 percent to 19 percent. His successor, former US president Joe Biden basically continued that policy.
In response, many companies have relocated their production lines to ASEAN members, India and Mexico to avoid high US tariffs.
As a result, Mexico has replaced China as the largest exporter to the US, and the share of Chinese goods in the US has also dropped from 21 percent to 13 percent.
Meanwhile, exports from ASEAN members and India to the US have increased rapidly, and the shift of the supply chain has also caused China to lose a huge number of jobs.
As soon as he returned to the White House, Trump raised tariffs on China by 20 percent, bringing the new tariffs to about 40 percent. That part of the policy is not a big problem.
The only thing that needs to be corrected is that the US should coordinate with Mexico, Canada and other countries to join the US in forming a customs alliance to jointly increase tariffs on China to prevent Chinese goods from taking advantage of the loopholes for origin washing via those countries to evade US tariffs.
All countries under the same defense umbrella as the US should adopt the economic and trade policies toward China that are consistent with the US and use their collective strength to force China to make economic system reforms. Higher tariffs should only be applicable to the countries that are unwilling to join the US camp.
Honda Chen is head of the sustainable finance office at the Taiwan Academy of Banking and Finance.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS