The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) recently announced it would propose two referendums — one opposing the “abolishment of the death penalty” and another opposing “martial law and war.” The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) also supports the proposals. Ironically, the more the blue and white camps push for those referendums, the more they undermine their own cause.
First, referendums are meant as an alternative to representative democracy — they are a way for the public to express their will in the event that representative democracy fails.
However, since combining forces to form a legislative majority, the KMT and TPP have regarded themselves as true representatives of majority public opinion, dominating the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in every vote. To propose those referendums now is tantamount to denying their own value as representatives of the public’s will.
Second, since President William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration, one execution has already been carried out and he has repeatedly said that martial law would not make a return to Taiwan.
The opposition alliance’s use of irrelevant and non-divisive issues for referendums not only wastes public money, but also squanders valuable deliberative time that could be spent addressing matters that genuinely impact people’s daily lives.
Third, if the blue and white camp wishes to increase the number and execution of death penalty sentences, or to abolish or significantly amend the Martial Law Act (戒嚴法), they can easily use the legislative process to do so — there is no need to complicate things further by initiating unnecessary referendums.
After all, there have been many instances where bills were pushed through despite significant opposition, with the KMT and TPP using their numerical advantage to secure passage.
Yet, on these two issues, they have suddenly abandoned that strategy — revealing that their real focus is political maneuvering, not a sincere commitment to opposing martial law or the abolition of the death penalty.
As the KMT faces a growing recall campaign, it has shown itself incapable of presenting a meaningful record of political achievements or genuine national vision. Instead, it has resorted to wasting public funds by weaponizing two serious issues — capital punishment and martial law.
By pushing referendums, they are trying to mobilize voters against the recall campaigns — their tactics are cheap and unbecoming of a party that claims to stand for the public interest.
Huang Wei-ping works in public service.
Translated by Tim Smith and Kyra Gustavsen
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
RSS