Europe finally appears serious about rearming. German legislators have agreed to exempt defense from constitutional limits on debt spending. The European Commission is urging members to raise military budgets to 3 percent of GDP and issue joint debt to fund weapons purchases — moves that could unlock more than 800 billion euros (US$866.16 billion) in additional spending over four years.
If European leaders are to build truly capable militaries that no longer depend on the US, they would need to change how they spend on defense, not just how much.
To be effective, any new funds must be deployed strategically, efficiently and cooperatively — something Europe has historically struggled to manage. Billions in joint EU funding for COVID-19 relief, for instance, were allegedly lost to fraud and waste; accountability has been a problem.
Past defense build-ups have fueled fragmentation rather than cooperation. European militaries field 29 different types of major warships, 27 howitzers, 20 fighter jets and 17 main battle tanks. By comparison, the US operates four, two, six and one respectively. That overlap inflates costs and dilutes effectiveness. Consolidation alone could free up 30 percent more resources, the European Defense Agency estimated.
Despite its plethora of platforms, Europe continues to rely on the US for capabilities that are core to its security, including airlift, missile defense, precision-guided munitions, and intelligence and surveillance systems. Over the past decade, European nations spent US$100 billion on US-made arms. Almost two-thirds of imports by European NATO states from 2020 to last year came from the US.
The immediate task must be to shore up Ukraine’s defenses. Allowing the country to falter would create instability on Europe’s doorstep, weaken deterrence, embolden Russia and ultimately require even greater defense expenditure. Realistically, that means some of the new funds would also have to be spent on US-made artillery, missile-defense systems and other capabilities, while European factories gear up.
Achieving genuine defense autonomy would demand deeper reforms, many outlined in a white paper issued by the commission last week. The top priority is to rationalize procurement. European countries too often invest in platforms unsuited for modern combat or which are not the best use of available resources (the UK’s aircraft carrier fleet is a case in point). Notably, only 18 percent of European procurement was collaborative in 2021, well below even the modest target of 35 percent.
Nations with often very different ideas of what constitutes security would quickly have to agree on a defense concept. Leaders must confront national protectionism head-on, promoting policies that favor integration and interoperability over continued duplication. (The Eurofighter aircraft and MBDA Missile Systems Services SAS, the pan-European joint venture in missile manufacturing, show cooperation at scale is possible.)
Next, European manufacturers would require stable, long-term defense contracts. Companies would only invest in building sustainable industrial capacity and developing a skilled workforce if they can count on a predictable pipeline of orders.
Finally, Europe’s defense sector must attract more private-sector investment. Venture capital flows lag considerably behind those in the US. Clear regulatory frameworks and targeted tax breaks can help spur innovations in emerging technologies such as drone, cyber and electronic warfare.
While the commission can encourage such changes, only national capitals combining forces can see them through. Existing NATO infrastructure offers one ready means of coordination. Having long called on its allies to do more, while paradoxically discouraging a European defense identity that would pull orders from US firms, Washington should welcome and support the process. It, too, would be stronger if Europe spends more on its defense — and spends better.
The Editorial Board publishes the views of the editors across a range of national and global affairs.
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
RSS