Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards.
She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of China.”
I sincerely share Chhabra’s disappointment and annoyance at Yeoh’s tendentious post, as we both feel genuine respect and affection for Taiwan.
However, I also think that lashing out at a well-beloved international star — however justifiably — is not the way to go.
Yeoh’s post came just after she had said, while in Taipei: “I do love this country very much,” but before she begins shooting her next film in China. This shows that she understands perfectly well that words have consequences and that she has weighed them carefully: Keeping her Chinese fans and financiers happy is worth more — a lot more — than not angering or losing her Taiwanese audience.
The “punishment” Chhabra suggests would mean little to her, as she has made up her mind.
That is why actor John Cena bent over backward in an embarrassing video a few years ago to apologize to his Chinese fans for calling Taiwan “a country.” For some people, a lot of people, money always trumps principles and intellectual honesty.
Worse, such a reaction against the Malaysian actress would risk making Taiwan look petty and resentful in front of the international public, which cares little about the subtleties of language with regards to sovereignty claims.
“Michelle Yeoh banned from Taiwan” is a headline that Beijing would love to read and turn viral. There is such a thing as bad publicity, after all, and it is the kind that Taiwan should strive to avoid.
Besides, banning and vetoing people for saying things it dislikes is China’s go-to response in situations like this, which is perfectly coherent with its dim view of human rights and civil liberties. Taiwan must not play that game; it is beneath its democratic convictions and unworthy of its respect for personal freedom.
On the contrary, Taiwan should publicly welcome Yeoh to come back and craft its invitation in ways that reflect, for all those around the globe who might not have been paying attention, what this nation is and China is not. That would make her look bad if she refuses the invitation and Taiwan look good if she accepts.
Invite her to do what, then? From the top of my head, to see a place where people can freely elect their leaders and criticize them without fear of reprisal; where their grievances and social demands can be heard by an independent judiciary; where they can use the Internet and social media as they wish without an army of censors; where no hukou (戶口, household registration permits) is required to relocate; where they can have as many (or as few) children as they want; where they are not constantly monitored by the government and given “social credit” scores; where they can express their opinions and their sexuality with no restrictions; and where they can inform themselves about their country and the world though a free press. The list could go on.
Sadly, I am pretty sure Yeoh is well aware of all this and much more. Not cool, Michelle, not cool.
Marcel Oppliger is a Chilean journalist and writer living in Taipei. He is the former opinion editor of newspapers Diario Financiero, La Tercera and La Segunda in Santiago, and the author of three non-fiction books.
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
“If you do not work in semiconductors, you are nothing in this country.” That is what an 18-year-old told me after my speech at the Kaohsiung International Youth Forum. It was a heartbreaking comment — one that highlights how Taiwan ignores the potential of the creative industry and the soft power that it generates. We all know what an Asian nation can achieve in that field. Japan led the way decades ago. South Korea followed with the enormous success of “hallyu” — also known as the Korean wave, referring to the global rise and spread of South Korean culture. Now Thailand
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
RSS