Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards.
She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of China.”
I sincerely share Chhabra’s disappointment and annoyance at Yeoh’s tendentious post, as we both feel genuine respect and affection for Taiwan.
However, I also think that lashing out at a well-beloved international star — however justifiably — is not the way to go.
Yeoh’s post came just after she had said, while in Taipei: “I do love this country very much,” but before she begins shooting her next film in China. This shows that she understands perfectly well that words have consequences and that she has weighed them carefully: Keeping her Chinese fans and financiers happy is worth more — a lot more — than not angering or losing her Taiwanese audience.
The “punishment” Chhabra suggests would mean little to her, as she has made up her mind.
That is why actor John Cena bent over backward in an embarrassing video a few years ago to apologize to his Chinese fans for calling Taiwan “a country.” For some people, a lot of people, money always trumps principles and intellectual honesty.
Worse, such a reaction against the Malaysian actress would risk making Taiwan look petty and resentful in front of the international public, which cares little about the subtleties of language with regards to sovereignty claims.
“Michelle Yeoh banned from Taiwan” is a headline that Beijing would love to read and turn viral. There is such a thing as bad publicity, after all, and it is the kind that Taiwan should strive to avoid.
Besides, banning and vetoing people for saying things it dislikes is China’s go-to response in situations like this, which is perfectly coherent with its dim view of human rights and civil liberties. Taiwan must not play that game; it is beneath its democratic convictions and unworthy of its respect for personal freedom.
On the contrary, Taiwan should publicly welcome Yeoh to come back and craft its invitation in ways that reflect, for all those around the globe who might not have been paying attention, what this nation is and China is not. That would make her look bad if she refuses the invitation and Taiwan look good if she accepts.
Invite her to do what, then? From the top of my head, to see a place where people can freely elect their leaders and criticize them without fear of reprisal; where their grievances and social demands can be heard by an independent judiciary; where they can use the Internet and social media as they wish without an army of censors; where no hukou (戶口, household registration permits) is required to relocate; where they can have as many (or as few) children as they want; where they are not constantly monitored by the government and given “social credit” scores; where they can express their opinions and their sexuality with no restrictions; and where they can inform themselves about their country and the world though a free press. The list could go on.
Sadly, I am pretty sure Yeoh is well aware of all this and much more. Not cool, Michelle, not cool.
Marcel Oppliger is a Chilean journalist and writer living in Taipei. He is the former opinion editor of newspapers Diario Financiero, La Tercera and La Segunda in Santiago, and the author of three non-fiction books.
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
The pan-blue camp in the era after the rule of the two Chiangs — former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) — can be roughly divided into two main factions: the “true blue,” who insist on opposing communism to protect the Republic of China (ROC), and the “red-blue,” who completely reject the current government and would rather collude with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to control Taiwan. The families of the former group suffered brutally under the hands of communist thugs in China. They know the CPP well and harbor a deep hatred for it — the two
RSS