President William Lai (賴清德) at a ceremony in Taipei on Wednesday to promote six armed forces officers said the military would “review the organizational structure of the main combat, defense and reserve forces” and, through regular exercises, test troops’ ability to carry out joint operations.
The consistent emphasis on combat resilience through practical training and focus on organizational reform in Lai’s military speeches is a demonstration of the importance the administration places on enhancing the military’s training quality and overall preparedness. This effort aims not only to culturally and structurally modernize Taiwan’s armed forces to meet global standards, but also to deliver high-quality, engaging and rewarding training to recruits to ensure they are equipped and motivated to defend the nation.
The reform focus of the administration is also evident in the emphasis it places on whole-of-society rapid response to disasters or contingencies. Ukraine’s resistance to the invasion by much-larger Russia has shown the importance of rapid whole-of-society mobilization — with civilians aiding logistics, medics training en masse and communities self-organizing. Lai on Thursday alongside Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) and representatives from 13 countries oversaw the first civil defense drills under the societal resilience committee he launched last year, a demonstration of his administration’s commitment to improving national preparedness across all levels of society to meet contingencies.
Lai is building on the firm foundation laid by former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), who not only reinstated one-year mandatory military service, but in addition to increasing defense spending, implementing an asymmetric strategy focus, supporting the indigenous defense industry and expanding civil defense drills, also set a new blueprint for bolstering military training, especially for reservists, while repurposing the reserve force to more seamlessly assist the main battle force.
In a televised address to the nation on Dec. 27, 2022 — the same address in which Tsai announced her decision to increase mandatory conscription from four months to one year — she called for shifting training from ceremonial and basic skills to practical combat capabilities, including urban warfare, asymmetric tactics, and for reservists to handle advanced weaponry such as Javelin missiles and drones.
Such reforms are important for conscripts, as they foster a sense of agency and purpose. When reservists train alongside active units, they feel that they are part of the fight, not just bystanders. Better training also breeds improved morale and confidence, which makes for better soldiers and effectiveness across all levels.
The announcement this week that in the first year since the reinstatement of one-year mandatory military service, 993 out of 6,956 conscripts, or 14.2 percent, remained in the armed forces as volunteer soldiers is an encouraging sign. This strong retention rate suggests that a meaningful portion of recruits found the experience rewarding, professionally valuable or aligned with their sense of duty. The figure signals growing confidence in Taiwan’s revamped training system, inspiring a new generation to serve.
However, meaningful reform still faces significant challenges. The military must overcome years of underinvestment in training, bureaucratic inertia and public skepticism toward service. Structural upgrades require not just new equipment and doctrine, but cultural change — breaking away from outdated practices and ensuring leaders at all levels embrace adaptability. Improving joint force integration, and command and control, also demands continued political will and funding.
Yet Lai’s strong political backing, the encouraging conscript retention rate and the US’ growing willingness to deepen military training with Taiwan augur well for the nation’s military reforms. With consistent leadership and sustained investment, Taiwan is on the right path to modernize its defense posture in line with the demands of contemporary warfare, while upgrading democratic resilience.
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
“If you do not work in semiconductors, you are nothing in this country.” That is what an 18-year-old told me after my speech at the Kaohsiung International Youth Forum. It was a heartbreaking comment — one that highlights how Taiwan ignores the potential of the creative industry and the soft power that it generates. We all know what an Asian nation can achieve in that field. Japan led the way decades ago. South Korea followed with the enormous success of “hallyu” — also known as the Korean wave, referring to the global rise and spread of South Korean culture. Now Thailand
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
RSS