This year’s tax revenue surplus exceeded NT$528.3 billion (US$15.96 billion). The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is proposing to “return money to the people,” with a plan to send a universal cash payout of NT$10,000 to every taxpayer. The KMT-majority legislature has passed a first reading of a special legal proposal to that end.
However, Taiwan Power Co (Taipower), facing long-term pressure from price increases on international energy imports since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, has sustained long-term losses for several years in a row. The utility company has racked up about NT$400 billion in debt to date.
The Executive Yuan originally planned to allocate more than NT$100 billion in subsidies from the surplus tax revenue to alleviate some of the pressure on the electricity provider and stave off risks of electricity price hikes.
However, the KMT’s slashing of the budget has prevented Taipower from receiving subsidies It is being forced to bear all-out pressure to raise electricity prices, which would ripple into the daily lives of all Taiwanese following a price hike.
Handing out a universal cash payout to everyone seems like a beneficial policy decision, but the reality is that such measures have a limited effect on economic growth and stimulating domestic demand.
Experience shows that most Taiwanese would opt to put such universal cash payouts into savings accounts or to pay off personal debt — a limited amount of that money ever makes its way back into consumer markets, and its contribution to GDP is negligible. On the contrary, it is extremely easy to turn tax rebate payouts into a tool for currying favor with voters.
Shoring up Taipower could directly reduce the pressure of electricity price-adjustment pressures from annual losses, and would help the nation avoid society-wide price hikes and soaring prices, which would further maintain consumer price index stability.
Electricity price hikes not only drag on more expensive kitchen-table economics, they can increase the operational overhead for everyone, as reflected in consumer prices and living expenses.
Thus, the legislature should shift away from its goal of shortsighted, near-term benefits via a universal cash payout, and instead move to pay off Taipower’s losses and stabilize our energy grid and energy pricing structures.
That would be the best way to benefit the entire nation: It could reduce Taipower’s debt and the growing pressure to raise rates, while guaranteeing that basic living expenses would not be impacted by potential electricity rate hikes.
Although a universal cash payout is on the surface more desirable, in the end it only obscures the bigger picture. In critical times such as these, we should hope that all of the nation’s political parties would put comprehensive thought into governance and use resources where they matter most to create policy that truly benefits everyone.
Lee Li-sheng is a research assistant at the Taiwan Economy and Industry Association and a graduate student at National Taiwan Normal University.
Translated by Tim Smith
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
The pan-blue camp in the era after the rule of the two Chiangs — former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) — can be roughly divided into two main factions: the “true blue,” who insist on opposing communism to protect the Republic of China (ROC), and the “red-blue,” who completely reject the current government and would rather collude with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to control Taiwan. The families of the former group suffered brutally under the hands of communist thugs in China. They know the CPP well and harbor a deep hatred for it — the two
RSS