Switzerland, a country of rock-solid neutrality in the heart of Europe, seems to be facing a historical decision. Having preserved its tradition of neutrality for nearly 200 years, it has always managed to maintain stability and mediate international storms. However, the country broke its longstanding silence on March 13, when Swiss Federal Councilor Ignazio Cassis — who heads the Swiss Department of Foreign Affairs — issued a statement of concern over the escalation of tensions in the Taiwan Strait.
This statement was not without purpose. China’s sudden live-fire military drills in the Taiwan Strait last month not only sparked concern in the region, but even reached as far as Europe. Switzerland’s own definition of neutrality is no longer limited to non-participation in wars — it has expanded to include the moral responsibility and practical interest of safeguarding the international order.
Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Switzerland has joined other countries in imposing economic sanctions on Russia, breaking its policy of neutrality. The decision to speak out on the Taiwan Strait issue could be seen as a continuation and deepening of this new approach. Swiss Federal Assembly member Jean-Luc Addor said during a legislative session that the Taiwan Strait is crucial to Swiss economic interests. His words reveal the logic behind the action — economic security, geopolitical stability and humanitarian principles cannot be avoided.
This move is not a betrayal of Swiss neutrality, but a modernization. As the international community relies increasingly on the rules-based order and cooperative governance, neutrality should be more than just passive observation — it should take the form of active guardianship. Switzerland’s statement did not indicate that it is taking sides, but emphasized dialogue and peace. This reflects a new interpretation of neutrality.
Switzerland would inevitably have to achieve a delicate balance between sticking to its longstanding principles and adapting to reality. Swiss neutrality is evolving. It is no longer just about silence and concessions — it is about speaking out selectively in defense of principles. The key factor to observe in the future would be whether Switzerland could manage to uphold the core values of its neutral spirit and courageously face the challenges of the current international order without abandoning its beliefs.
Edwin Yang is an associate professor at National Taiwan Normal University and chairman of the Central Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
Earlier signs suggest that US President Donald Trump’s policy on Taiwan is set to move in a more resolute direction, as his administration begins to take a tougher approach toward America’s main challenger at the global level, China. Despite its deepening economic woes, China continues to flex its muscles, including conducting provocative military drills off Taiwan, Australia and Vietnam recently. A recent Trump-signed memorandum on America’s investment policy was more about the China threat than about anything else. Singling out the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as a foreign adversary directing investments in American companies to obtain cutting-edge technologies, it said
The recent termination of Tibetan-language broadcasts by Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) is a significant setback for Tibetans both in Tibet and across the global diaspora. The broadcasts have long served as a vital lifeline, providing uncensored news, cultural preservation and a sense of connection for a community often isolated by geopolitical realities. For Tibetans living under Chinese rule, access to independent information is severely restricted. The Chinese government tightly controls media and censors content that challenges its narrative. VOA and RFA broadcasts have been among the few sources of uncensored news available to Tibetans, offering insights
“If you do not work in semiconductors, you are nothing in this country.” That is what an 18-year-old told me after my speech at the Kaohsiung International Youth Forum. It was a heartbreaking comment — one that highlights how Taiwan ignores the potential of the creative industry and the soft power that it generates. We all know what an Asian nation can achieve in that field. Japan led the way decades ago. South Korea followed with the enormous success of “hallyu” — also known as the Korean wave, referring to the global rise and spread of South Korean culture. Now Thailand
RSS