Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) and Minister of Culture Li Yuan (李遠) last month held a meeting in New Taipei City to discuss “cultural diplomacy,” with a particular focus on the Expo 2025 in Osaka, Japan, which is to be held next month.
Taiwan could not take part in this world-class festival under its own national name. Its international visibility is again compromised by political reality.
However, a project of building “Taiwan’s own pavilion” has been initiated by civil society, bringing light into darkness. The unofficial project was coordinated by civil groups including the Central Taiwan Association of University Professors.
The project’s plan is to build a pavilion with 2,300 wood pillars to represent the collective will of 23 million Taiwanese. The wood pillars are not only building materials, but would also deliver a political metaphor and a cultural expression to the world — despite being suppressed and marginalized, Taiwan would not be absent.
“Taiwan’s own pavilion” is not only a strategic cultural breakthrough, but also a civic action attempting to cover for the government’s limitations.
When the legislature slashed the budget for the “Yushan Pavilion,” limiting the government’s participation, civil groups raised funds, came up with creative designs, made plans and curated the project, demonstrating the resilience and creativity of Taiwanese society.
While their action is worth rounds of applause, it also calls for reflection. The opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party slashed and froze the general budget proposed by the government, leaving citizens to fend for themselves, demonstrating the predicament faced by the government under the current balance of political powers.
The opposition lawmakers manifested their short-sightedness in policymaking by slashing budgets for Taiwan’s international participation.
This is a critical moment to integrate resources to showcase Taiwan’s achievements at a world-class festival, and yet we failed to do so. If the government continues to be absent, Taiwan would not be able to shine on the global stage.
What is more worrying is that this method of global participation is apparently unsustainable. Although the Ministry of Culture has plans to hold cultural activities in Japan, Taiwan could only rely on fundraising by civic groups, while other countries have pavilions present at the Expo in the name of their countries and have comprehensive strategies of cultural diplomacy.
“Taiwan’s own pavilion” carries a powerful implication — civil society can cover for the government in its absence.
However, in the long run, Taiwan’s international status cannot be consolidated only by civil society’s efforts and enthusiasm.
The government should address the problem, promote cultural diplomacy, proactively seek international support, strengthen cooperation with allies and develop a long-term and stable international participation strategy.
We should not let civil society fight on its own. The government should not be allowed to use political reality as an excuse for its inaction.
Only when the government works together with the public can Taiwan truly step on the world stage to enhance its international visibility and garner support.
Edwin Yang is an associate professor at National Taiwan Normal University and chairman of the Central Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Fion Khan
There are moments in history when America has turned its back on its principles and withdrawn from past commitments in service of higher goals. For example, US-Soviet Cold War competition compelled America to make a range of deals with unsavory and undemocratic figures across Latin America and Africa in service of geostrategic aims. The United States overlooked mass atrocities against the Bengali population in modern-day Bangladesh in the early 1970s in service of its tilt toward Pakistan, a relationship the Nixon administration deemed critical to its larger aims in developing relations with China. Then, of course, America switched diplomatic recognition
The international women’s soccer match between Taiwan and New Zealand at the Kaohsiung Nanzih Football Stadium, scheduled for Tuesday last week, was canceled at the last minute amid safety concerns over poor field conditions raised by the visiting team. The Football Ferns, as New Zealand’s women’s soccer team are known, had arrived in Taiwan one week earlier to prepare and soon raised their concerns. Efforts were made to improve the field, but the replacement patches of grass could not grow fast enough. The Football Ferns canceled the closed-door training match and then days later, the main event against Team Taiwan. The safety
The National Immigration Agency on Tuesday said it had notified some naturalized citizens from China that they still had to renounce their People’s Republic of China (PRC) citizenship. They must provide proof that they have canceled their household registration in China within three months of the receipt of the notice. If they do not, the agency said it would cancel their household registration in Taiwan. Chinese are required to give up their PRC citizenship and household registration to become Republic of China (ROC) nationals, Mainland Affairs Council Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said. He was referring to Article 9-1 of the Act
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
RSS