Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Friday attempted to push through two referendum proposals — one opposing the abolition of the death penalty, and another rejecting martial law and war — in the Legislative Yuan, in what appeared to be a desperate move to counter the growing nationwide mass recall movement targeting them.
As of last week, 34 out of the KMT’s 36 district legislators were facing second-phase recall petitions, while the party’s original counter-plan — recall campaigns against Democratic Progressive Party lawmakers — failed to pass the first phase. Compounding the setback, several KMT workers are under investigation for alleged forgery, as many of the submitted petitions included names of unsuspecting or even deceased people.
The KMT said it would prioritize legislation that improves people’s “livelihoods” this session, including giving a “universal cash payment” of NT$10,000 to each resident. KMT legislators have also called for a “mandatory death penalty” for those convicted of child abuse resulting in death. The referendum proposal is just the latest in a series of attempts to win support amid a mounting public backlash.
The KMT’s “anti-martial law” referendum proposal states: “President William Lai [賴清德] has labeled China as a hostile foreign force, and the public is concerned that cross-strait relations might enter a quasi-war,” asking: “Do you agree that the government should avoid war and prevent Taiwan from becoming another Ukraine, where martial law is imposed, young lives are lost and homes are destroyed?”
The other proposed referendum asks: “Do you agree with the policy of a ‘collegiate bench of judges of courts of all levels do not need a unanimous verdict to impose a death sentence?’”
The KMT legislative caucus issued a three-line whip to ensure party discipline in passing the proposals, but heated debate among lawmakers stalled the process. The proposals have been rescheduled for review tomorrow.
Central Election Commission Chairman Lee Chin-yung (李進勇) said the proposals appear “self-contradictory” and illogical, as they seek to ask the government to halt policies that are not being implemented, and might even be illegal or unconstitutional.
The Referendum Act (公民投票法) says that a referendum proposal should “address only one issue,” yet the “anti-martial law and anti-war” proposal combines multiple vague concepts. It also appears aimed to mislead voters into believing that labeling China as a “foreign hostile force” would lead to “quasi-war” — a term undefined in the proposal. It further conflates this scenario with hypothetical notions of invoking “martial law” and “wartime Ukraine” in Taiwan.
The proposal is also a leading question, implicitly urging voters to vote “no” to a mix of concepts under the guise of anti-war messaging, which contravenes the act’s stipulation that “the main text of the proposal must be concise, clear and objectively neutral.”
The proposal against abolishing the death penalty refers to a Constitutional Court verdict last year that requires a unanimous decision among judges to impose the death penalty, which the KMT claims amounts to its “substantive abolition.”
While a Constitutional Court verdict is not equal to the Constitution itself, it has binding legal force and can only be overturned through a constitutional amendment. By framing the verdict as a mere “policy” and proposing a referendum to reject it, the KMT’s approach bypasses proper constitutional procedures.
Although the KMT’s goal is to push for the referendums to be held on the same day as recall voting, hoping to encourage people to support the referendums while voting “no” on recalling its legislators, its proposals might backfire, fueling contempt and strengthening the resolve of recall petitioners aiming to remove KMT lawmakers and put an end to what many see as political theatrics.
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
The pan-blue camp in the era after the rule of the two Chiangs — former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) — can be roughly divided into two main factions: the “true blue,” who insist on opposing communism to protect the Republic of China (ROC), and the “red-blue,” who completely reject the current government and would rather collude with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to control Taiwan. The families of the former group suffered brutally under the hands of communist thugs in China. They know the CPP well and harbor a deep hatred for it — the two
RSS