US health agency leadership and policymakers seem intent on undermining trust in messenger RNA (mRNA), the technology that saved millions of lives during the COVID-19 pandemic and has shown promise in addressing a range of infectious diseases and even cancer.
One troubling sign of the trend came when, according to Kaiser Family Foundation reporting, National Institutes of Health officials told academic researchers to remove any mention of mRNA vaccine technology from their grant applications. The directive dovetails with weak or misleading messaging from public health agencies on the value of vaccines and proposed state legislation that would ban mRNA shots.
All of this is sending public health in the wrong direction, whether because people eschew today’s COVID-19 vaccine or refuse to take whatever mRNA shots are developed to address a future pandemic — if those vaccines are developed at all. The current environment puts at risk momentum for critical prevention and treatments.
“What this is doing is quite literally putting partisan politics in front of a cure for cancer,” said Matthew Motta, assistant professor of Health Law, Policy and Management at Boston University’s School of Public Health.
“It’s really sad that this is going to impact people’s lives in a very tangible way, not only by taking away care that they have access to, but deprive them of something they could have access to one day,” he said.
The mRNA technology took decades to develop. It was painstaking work supported by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and ultimately recognized with the 2023 Nobel Prize in medicine. The goal is no different than that of a conventional vaccine — to expose the immune system to key components of a bad actor, whether a virus or a cancer mutation, so it learns how to shut it down the next time it appears.
Here is what an mRNA vaccine does not do: integrate into or interact with our DNA, cause infertility, contain microchips or cause people to “shed” the vaccine.
Yet those claims have persisted — and not just from random people pushing conspiracy theories on social media. Government officials have also pushed the false theories. A 2021 analysis by the Center for Countering Digital Hate identified US Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Robert F. Kennedy Jr as one of the most prominent spreaders of disinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine. Kennedy lobbied to get the vaccine pulled from the market in mid-2021 and later called it “the deadliest vaccine ever made.”
He has not publicly repeated his wilder claims about COVID-19 vaccines since US President Donald Trump appointed him to the HHS job. However, he questioned their use in children during his US Senate confirmation hearings, and the agencies he oversees are signaling a distrust in mRNA.
In addition to the potential cuts to funding supporting research on mRNA, NIH has terminated dozens of grants related to studying vaccine hesitancy, some of which centered on the COVID-19 vaccines. Meanwhile, HHS is weighing pulling a US$590 million contract awarded to Moderna to use its technology to develop bird flu shots.
Defunding or de-emphasizing research into mRNA and related vaccine hesitancy is deeply concerning. The suppression of scientific inquiry into an area of study that has already saved millions of lives and has the potential to be one of humanity’s best defenses against future pandemics puts all of us in harm’s way.
This means we might be unable to pivot quickly to technology that can be rapidly deployed in an emergency. We also could be stifling research that could make mRNA better. Our COVID-19 vaccines do a great job of keeping people out of the hospital and from dying, but we should continue to look for shots that prevent infection, are more potent or can be made more cheaply.
The early promise the technology has shown in cancer is enough to warrant a full-court press. Biotech firms such as Moderna and BioNTech might take on some of the work, but academic partners funded by the NIH have been critical to the foundational science underpinning those companies’ work.
The scarier scenario is that we might find ourselves in an increasingly dangerous feedback loop around mRNA and vaccination, where distrust fomented by health agencies breeds anti-vaccine laws reinforcing that distrust. “If some people think vaccines are unsafe and ought not to be mandated, then our policymakers who are concerned about being reelected ... have an incentive to follow through on it,” Motta said.
Motta’s research has shown that they already are. Since Trump took office, multiple states have introduced legislation — some defeated, some pending — targeting mRNA vaccines. Policymakers in Idaho, Iowa and Montana attempted to ban mRNA vaccines altogether (the measure in Montana ultimately failed). Florida Governor Ron DeSantis this month said he would seek to ban mRNA vaccine mandates permanently.
All of these actions by state and federal leaders do not just set up barriers, but feed mistrust around mRNA that could affect attitudes about the safety and value of all shots, whether for COVID, bird flu or other diseases. That is sending science backward and would ultimately be harmful to Americans.
Lisa Jarvis is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering biotech, healthcare and the pharmaceutical industry. Previously, she was executive editor of Chemical & Engineering News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
You wish every Taiwanese spoke English like I do. I was not born an anglophone, yet I am paid to write and speak in English. It is my working language and my primary idiom in private. I am more than bilingual: I think in English; it is my language now. Can you guess how many native English speakers I had as teachers in my entire life? Zero. I only lived in an English-speaking country, Australia, in my 30s, and it was because I was already fluent that I was able to live and pursue a career. English became my main language during adulthood
The international women’s soccer match between Taiwan and New Zealand at the Kaohsiung Nanzih Football Stadium, scheduled for Tuesday last week, was canceled at the last minute amid safety concerns over poor field conditions raised by the visiting team. The Football Ferns, as New Zealand’s women’s soccer team are known, had arrived in Taiwan one week earlier to prepare and soon raised their concerns. Efforts were made to improve the field, but the replacement patches of grass could not grow fast enough. The Football Ferns canceled the closed-door training match and then days later, the main event against Team Taiwan. The safety
There are moments in history when America has turned its back on its principles and withdrawn from past commitments in service of higher goals. For example, US-Soviet Cold War competition compelled America to make a range of deals with unsavory and undemocratic figures across Latin America and Africa in service of geostrategic aims. The United States overlooked mass atrocities against the Bengali population in modern-day Bangladesh in the early 1970s in service of its tilt toward Pakistan, a relationship the Nixon administration deemed critical to its larger aims in developing relations with China. Then, of course, America switched diplomatic recognition
The National Immigration Agency on Tuesday said it had notified some naturalized citizens from China that they still had to renounce their People’s Republic of China (PRC) citizenship. They must provide proof that they have canceled their household registration in China within three months of the receipt of the notice. If they do not, the agency said it would cancel their household registration in Taiwan. Chinese are required to give up their PRC citizenship and household registration to become Republic of China (ROC) nationals, Mainland Affairs Council Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said. He was referring to Article 9-1 of the Act
RSS