Animal attacks recently occurred in Taipei City, where — in two separate incidents — the same pit bull terrier jumped out of a truck window and bit motorcyclists stopped at a red light. Both happened within a couple of weeks, subjecting the two attacked to physical and psychological trauma.
The Taipei City Animal Protection Office confiscated the pit bull from its owner and specialists are evaluating the dog to determine whether it is suitable for adoption. However, it is worth questioning whether investing substantial resources in rehabilitating a breed known for aggression and attacks on humans is a responsible or effective use of public funds.
The breeding and ownership of pit bulls have long been banned in the UK, Australia and France. Many EU countries have also implemented strict restrictions on them. In the US, dogs that attack people are typically seized and sent to shelters, where most are humanely euthanized, rather than committing extensive resources to behavioral correction.
That is because animal shelters have limited resources, and prioritize caring for dogs that are likely to get adopted over those with severe behavioral issues that are difficult to correct. After all, it is impossible for a shelter to provide the necessary behavioral training needed for every dog to meet adoption requirements.
So why give special treatment to that pit bull? Is it due to misguided public pressure disguised as animal protection, or an attempt by the authorities to shirk their responsibilities? Even under a “no-kill” policy, the government should consider long-term sheltering for dangerous animals, rather than readoption.
While animal protection is important, we must also prioritize the safety of humans. The spirit of the Animal Protection Act (動物保護法) should not be interpreted as offering unconditional protection of animals while disregarding the rights and interests of humans. In Taiwan, although pit bulls are classified as “designated pets” and are subject to management and breeding regulations, they remain legal to own. In contrast, many countries completely ban pit bull ownership and breeding, citing public safety risks and the breed’s potential for unpredictable aggression.
A dog’s behavior is often a reflection of its owner’s actions and responsibilities. However, when an animal exhibits aggressive or dangerous behavior, we should seriously consider whether its welfare should be placed above the overall safety of the public.
Johnson Chiang is a former president of the World Veterinary Association.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
There are moments in history when America has turned its back on its principles and withdrawn from past commitments in service of higher goals. For example, US-Soviet Cold War competition compelled America to make a range of deals with unsavory and undemocratic figures across Latin America and Africa in service of geostrategic aims. The United States overlooked mass atrocities against the Bengali population in modern-day Bangladesh in the early 1970s in service of its tilt toward Pakistan, a relationship the Nixon administration deemed critical to its larger aims in developing relations with China. Then, of course, America switched diplomatic recognition
The international women’s soccer match between Taiwan and New Zealand at the Kaohsiung Nanzih Football Stadium, scheduled for Tuesday last week, was canceled at the last minute amid safety concerns over poor field conditions raised by the visiting team. The Football Ferns, as New Zealand’s women’s soccer team are known, had arrived in Taiwan one week earlier to prepare and soon raised their concerns. Efforts were made to improve the field, but the replacement patches of grass could not grow fast enough. The Football Ferns canceled the closed-door training match and then days later, the main event against Team Taiwan. The safety
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
RSS