In an attempt to counter the mass recall movement, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) plans to launch an “anti-martial law, anti-war” referendum campaign. However, the main text of the referendum proposal is not only logically flawed, but also contravenes the Referendum Act (公民投票法). The following is an analysis of the proposal from logical and legal perspectives.
The main text of the so-called “anti-martial law” referendum proposal states that President William Lai (賴清德) has labeled China as a “foreign hostile force” and that it has raised concerns among the public that the cross-strait relationship might enter a “quasi-war.”
It reads: “Do you agree that the government should avoid war and prevent Taiwan from becoming another Ukraine, where martial law is imposed, young lives are lost and homes are destroyed?”
In logical reasoning, there exists a concept: “If P, then Q,” where “P” is the premise of a situation and “Q” is the conclusion that follows this premise. If the premise “P” is true, then the conclusion “Q” must also be true, so we would call that proposition “true.” However, if the premise “P” is true, but the conclusion “Q” is not true, then the proposition is considered “false.”
The key point here is that Lai’s labeling of China as a “foreign hostile force” does not logically lead to the conclusion that the public is concerned about the cross-strait situation entering a state of “quasi-war.” After all, the Chinese Communist Party’s aggressive behavior — conducting “united front” infiltration, sending military aircraft and ships to harass Taiwan daily and refusing to abandon its ambition of forcibly annexing Taiwan — existed long before Lai made his statement.
Since his statement does not logically lead to the conclusion that China and Taiwan would be pushed into a “quasi-war,” the referendum’s subsequent conclusion of Taiwan “becoming another Ukraine, where martial law is imposed, young lives are lost and homes are destroyed” is naturally unfounded.
Therefore, the referendum proposal clearly presents a “false” proposition.
According to the regulations in Article 9 of the Referendum Act, the main text of a referendum proposal must not imply negative connotations or use leading phrases. The content of the KMT’s “anti-martial law” referendum proposal says China has been labeled as a “foreign hostile force” — that is a fact.
However, it then deliberately connects that to a “quasi-war,” and wants to avoid a war between Taiwan and China, and prevent Taiwan from becoming “another Ukraine, where martial law is imposed, young lives are lost and homes are destroyed.”
Making that connection clearly contravenes the Referendum Act’s prohibition on implying negative connotations and using leading phrases in a referendum proposal.
The KMT’s strategy is to tie its referendum to the recall vote, encouraging voters to simultaneously support the referendum and vote “no” on the recall.
However, using leading statements and misleading rhetoric in the referendum proposal in an attempt to confuse voters would only add more fuel to the recall fire.
Yeh Yu-cheng is a secretary at the Pingtung County Public Health Bureau.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
RSS