Japan’s ruling party is seeking a new leader. We are a leading political organization that has dominated power for the past 70 years. The perfect candidate would be popular with the electorate, able to bridge various factions and have an ability to win elections. Above all, they would have no skeletons in the closet or ties to religious cults — and definitely no history of giving potentially illegal political gifts.
When the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) last year set about looking for a new leader, the job description would have read something like that. However, the man who got the job, Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, did not get the message. It is bad enough that his public popularity has been underwhelming, leading to a disastrous performance in last year’s general election that left the LDP running a minority government. Now, just as polling season is set to ramp up again, he was caught up in a political funding scandal, trashing a squeaky-clean image that was perhaps his greatest public strength.
Ishiba had admitted to giving gift vouchers worth ￥100,000 (US$670) to 15 first-time lawmakers ahead of a dinner at his official residence. Although they all returned the gifts, the act could be in contravention of political funding laws, although the legislation has plenty of wiggle room.
The vouchers were “prepared at my own personal expense, from my pocket money, in lieu of a souvenir of the dinner and as a gesture of appreciation to their families,” Ishiba said last week when the news broke. “They don’t violate any laws.”
It might be true that his gifts are not criminal — experts are divided — and it might hinge on what exactly was discussed at the dinner. However, the legality is not the core issue: It is a matter of appearances. The only reason Ishiba is in the job at all is because of the scandal that has consumed the LDP for more than a year, in which lawmakers failed to report hundreds of millions of yen in proceeds from fundraising parties. It has led to multiple indictments and the dissolution of almost all the LDP’s factions. Ishiba’s predecessor, Fumio Kishida, stepped down to take responsibility, despite not being personally implicated.
Ishiba’s rationale has rung hollow. The prime minister said that since the gifts were not intended to be used for political purposes, they are harmless. And in any case, he also received such gifts when he was younger, he said. His attempts to deal with the scandal have the air of an “I’m sorry if you were offended” non-apology.
Rather than demonstrate humility, he instead berated a reporter who asked if the gifts contravened political funding laws. The prime minister seemed to seek a “gotcha” moment, demanding they cite precisely which clause and article of the law he might have contravened.
Ishiba likes to carry the airs of being the “smartest person in the room.” That was hardly the time for such preening. If there was nothing wrong with the gifts, then the lawmakers would not be returning them. It is telling that all 15, elected for the first time, seemed to have better political instincts than a man who has spent his career trying to become prime minister.
Of course, you might say the stakes are minuscule, as they often are in Japanese politics. Who can be bought for US$670? However, precisely because of the LDP’s stranglehold on power, the public is distrustful. Resignations have in the past been triggered for very minor infractions, such as distributing melons or paper fans to constituents.
Taken as a whole, the amount spent was ￥1.5 million, or about one-third of the average national salary — not exactly “pocket money,” as Ishiba put it. Especially at a time when voters are incensed not only about the LDP’s use of slush funds, but with inflation and falling real wages, it is hard to understand what the prime minister was thinking. Often thought to be in touch with regular people despite his own rather privileged background, he has misread the situation badly.
The affair has already torpedoed his polling. An Asahi survey found support for his Cabinet dropped 14 percentage points to 26 percent — the same level for Kishida before his resignation, although 60 percent said Ishiba did not need to resign over the incident.
The timing of the scandal, coming just a day after the first public calls within the LDP to remove him, fearing defeat in the upper house elections this summer, would raise suspicions that it is a coordinated effort to push Ishiba out. However, I am not convinced that any of the contenders, including former Japanese minister of state for economic security Sanae Takaichi, whom he defeated in last year’s runoff vote to lead the party, would resonate any better. Others who might make strong candidates could be reluctant to take their shot, when the party commands a weak minority government. It is a matter of debate whether any LDP politician can live up to the standards demanded by the public right now. The party brand itself might be damaged beyond repair.
One thing is for sure: No matter the workplace, if you do not live up to the job expectations, sooner or later you would be shown the door.
Gearoid Reidy is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Japan and the Koreas. He previously led the breaking news team in North Asia and was the Tokyo deputy bureau chief.
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
RSS