Gen Z has been in the workforce just long enough to want out. Well, at least temporarily. The concept of a micro-retirement has started to trend (again) on social media, which makes it seem as if an entire generation of 20-somethings wants to take an adult gap year.
Is that a rebranding of the more well-known sabbatical? Yes, with a couple of noteworthy caveats: Micro-retirement is not employer-granted — say goodbye to pay while you are away or a guaranteed job upon return — and it is meant to be more of a routine lifestyle choice to combat burnout and pursue personal passions.
However, it is not Gen Z that should be fixating on micro-retirement; it is companies.
Illustration: Mountain People
Employers can and should offer those sorts of breaks to their employees as a workplace benefit, especially if working remotely is no longer an option. Offering access to an employer-granted micro-retirement, which sounds far chicer than “sabbatical,” is one more set of golden handcuffs. It is a perk akin to an employer-matched 401(k) — restricted stock units with a suboptimal vesting schedule or the ultimate golden handcuffs: health insurance. Asking businesses to adopt workplace changes inspired by the whims of the youth can seem impractical and create the cliche “kids these days” response from older employees and bosses, but they should remember that the practice is not necessarily a new phenomenon.
Everything from what people wear to what is a socially acceptable way to speak to a subordinate to the demographics of the office was shifted by young employees over the decades. Gen Z just happens to broadcast their strategies, such as “quiet quitting” or “lazy girl jobs,” on social media, which can often make the ideas feel like passing trends.
However, before micro-retirement is dismissed outright, consider what companies are up against. Businesses should be focused on retention, especially with 18 percent and 36 percent of the workforce now made up of two generations — Gen Z and millennials respectively — that have demonstrated they have no qualms with quitting and job hopping.
It can cost tens of thousands of dollars to replace an employee. First, there is the recruiting process and lost productivity that comes with it, including the managers and employees taking time to interview prospective replacements. It also often takes an increase in pay to attract quality talent to the now-empty position, especially if the previous employee was around for several years. Then there is having to train talent, which can still result in lost productivity until the new hire is fully onboarded and up to speed on the role.
Salary.com estimates that replacing an employee can cost between half and twice their salary.
On the other side, micro-retirement could be treated like an employee going on parental leave and work could be distributed amongst colleagues. Perhaps it could be a benefit that is unlocked after three years at a company, can last up to four weeks at a time and eligibility renews every three years. However a company chooses to implement it, the advantage is that it is a perk available to everyone, which might lower any animosity that coworkers sometimes have toward those going out on parental leave.
If you are wondering if the concept of a sabbatical truly needed to be rebranded, perhaps it does. The newer term might represent more than just a catchy phrase for its users. Sabbaticals have usually been tied to academia. Taking one often includes research or bettering skill sets to return more useful for an employer. However, the term micro-retirement embodies the idea of a complete break from work to indulge in life while you are younger and presumably healthier.
The indulgence does not have to be a swoon-worthy vacation to splash all over social media, either. It could be as simple as having the gift of focused, uninterrupted time to spend with loved ones.
That is the sort of break that sounds enticing to younger workers when they start crunching some numbers.
According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, life expectancy in the US has fallen in recent years to about 80 years for women and just shy of 75 for men. A 2023 Gallup poll showed that the mean age that non-retirees anticipate retiring is 66 years old.
Having less than 15 years to enjoy leisure time after more than 40 years in the workforce is pitiful, particularly in a country where, according to a 2023 Pew Research Center study, 4 in 10 workers fail to take their full allotment of vacation days. The US Bureau of Labor Statistics reported the average private sector worker receives 11 vacation days after one year of employment, and it only goes up to 18 days after 10 years.
Even with that grim outlook, the likelihood of companies rapidly coming around to offering micro-retirements is slim, which is why anyone who wants to take one would have to continue to work toward funding their own time off. That is so long as the prospect of finding another job or figuring out a backup plan for health insurance would not cast a pall on the micro-retirement movement.
I have dealt with burnout more than once in my career — both when I was traditionally employed (and working a side hustle) and as a self-employed millennial. The latter status allowed me the flexibility to take a three-month break, but worrying about losing out on opportunities was hard to shake. I suspect Gen Z might need a little bit of practice to overcome this part: I had to be confident and disciplined enough to decline work opportunities for three months, fully get off social media, and focus on pleasure and creativity to alleviate the burnout.
It was not a magical cure-all, but the distance from the rut of routine sparked new ideas and clarified changes I needed to make in my business and life.
Erin Lowry is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering personal finance. She is the author of the three-part Broke Millennial series.
You wish every Taiwanese spoke English like I do. I was not born an anglophone, yet I am paid to write and speak in English. It is my working language and my primary idiom in private. I am more than bilingual: I think in English; it is my language now. Can you guess how many native English speakers I had as teachers in my entire life? Zero. I only lived in an English-speaking country, Australia, in my 30s, and it was because I was already fluent that I was able to live and pursue a career. English became my main language during adulthood
Taiwan on Monday celebrated Freedom of Speech Day. The commemoration is not an international day, and was first established in Tainan by President William Lai (賴清德) in 2012, when he was mayor of that city. The day was elevated to a national holiday in 2016 by then-president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文). Lai chose April 7, because it marks the anniversary of the death of democracy advocate Deng Nan-jung (鄭南榕), who started Freedom Era Weekly to promote freedom of expression. Thirty-six years ago, a warrant for Deng’s arrest had been issued after he refused to appear in court to answer charges of
The Opinion page has published several articles and editorials over the past few weeks addressing Taiwan’s efforts to leverage unique or strong aspects of its culture to increase international awareness of the nation. These have included submissions by foreign journalists and overseas students, highlighting how bubble milk tea, Guinness World Record attempts, the entertainment sectors, impressive scenery, world-class cuisine and important contributions to the high-tech supply chain can enhance Taiwan’s recognition overseas and therefore its soft power. That entails competing for attention in already crowded sectors. Other nations, after all, offer popular entertainment exports, beautiful scenic spots and great food.
The National Immigration Agency on Tuesday said it had notified some naturalized citizens from China that they still had to renounce their People’s Republic of China (PRC) citizenship. They must provide proof that they have canceled their household registration in China within three months of the receipt of the notice. If they do not, the agency said it would cancel their household registration in Taiwan. Chinese are required to give up their PRC citizenship and household registration to become Republic of China (ROC) nationals, Mainland Affairs Council Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said. He was referring to Article 9-1 of the Act
RSS