When the Cabinet requested a reconsideration of the central government general budget approved by the legislature, the legislature inexplicably demanded that the executive branch cut the budget itself by NT$6.36 billion (US$192.7 million). Opposition lawmakers’ actions have led to criticism of their “contravening principles of responsible governance.”
Not only are they reneging on their obligation to review the budget, they are harming the normal and stable operation of government agencies, and undermining the democratic government’s balance of powers.
The legislature is abandoning its obligation to conduct reviews and infringing on responsible governance.
Budgetary reviews are a core job component for legislators to ensure that government spending aligns with national development needs and upholds fiscal discipline.
In principle, the legislature should carefully review each ministry’s budget and decide whether to cut or adjust it. However, instead of conducting substantial deliberations, it told the Executive Yuan to cut NT$6.36 billion from the budget itself, essentially handing its responsibility to review spending to the executive branch and its ministries and agencies.
Such an abrogation of duty goes against the fundamental principles of responsible governance: The legislature must exercise supervisory powers pertaining to the budget and should not shift this and other duties onto other branches of the government, or demand that the executive branch review budgetary items and decide what stays and what goes.
Specifically, the legislature did not clearly enumerate the items it intends to cut or adjust; it instead demanded that the executive branch cut its proposed expenditure to meet the figure set by the legislature, leaving the executive branch in a tough position.
If ministries and agencies lack concrete direction in implementing the budget, this could lead to plans being halted due to insufficient funding, or to partial reductions in services and personnel due to budget shortfalls. This indeterminacy impacts the effectiveness of governance and harms the quality of public services.
This is not the first time the legislature has tried to pass its responsibilities to the executive branch, but is a long-standing abuse of budgetary review duties. Some opposition lawmakers are using “budget freezes” and demands that the Executive Yuan cut the budget itself to deepen political conflict and block implementation of government policy instead of carrying out precise budget adjustments through reasoned and rational deliberation. Their actions have the veneer of supervision, but the reality is that they are causing ministries to take on an unreasonable burden, further impacting the stability of government operations.
The legislature’s use of simplistic reductions of the budget without looking at actual items is a political propaganda tool. It has abandoned the professional spirit of budgetary reviews.
The legislature’s demand that the executive branch itself reduce the budget not only contravenes principles of responsible governance, but threatens the stable operations of government agencies.
The legislature should replace political manipulations with substantive reviews to make budget reviews a foundation that buttress government operations, not a tool for destabilization.
Edwin Yang is an associate professor at National Taiwan Normal University and chairman of the Central Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Tim Smith
You wish every Taiwanese spoke English like I do. I was not born an anglophone, yet I am paid to write and speak in English. It is my working language and my primary idiom in private. I am more than bilingual: I think in English; it is my language now. Can you guess how many native English speakers I had as teachers in my entire life? Zero. I only lived in an English-speaking country, Australia, in my 30s, and it was because I was already fluent that I was able to live and pursue a career. English became my main language during adulthood
The international women’s soccer match between Taiwan and New Zealand at the Kaohsiung Nanzih Football Stadium, scheduled for Tuesday last week, was canceled at the last minute amid safety concerns over poor field conditions raised by the visiting team. The Football Ferns, as New Zealand’s women’s soccer team are known, had arrived in Taiwan one week earlier to prepare and soon raised their concerns. Efforts were made to improve the field, but the replacement patches of grass could not grow fast enough. The Football Ferns canceled the closed-door training match and then days later, the main event against Team Taiwan. The safety
There are moments in history when America has turned its back on its principles and withdrawn from past commitments in service of higher goals. For example, US-Soviet Cold War competition compelled America to make a range of deals with unsavory and undemocratic figures across Latin America and Africa in service of geostrategic aims. The United States overlooked mass atrocities against the Bengali population in modern-day Bangladesh in the early 1970s in service of its tilt toward Pakistan, a relationship the Nixon administration deemed critical to its larger aims in developing relations with China. Then, of course, America switched diplomatic recognition
The National Immigration Agency on Tuesday said it had notified some naturalized citizens from China that they still had to renounce their People’s Republic of China (PRC) citizenship. They must provide proof that they have canceled their household registration in China within three months of the receipt of the notice. If they do not, the agency said it would cancel their household registration in Taiwan. Chinese are required to give up their PRC citizenship and household registration to become Republic of China (ROC) nationals, Mainland Affairs Council Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said. He was referring to Article 9-1 of the Act
RSS