When the Cabinet requested a reconsideration of the central government general budget approved by the legislature, the legislature inexplicably demanded that the executive branch cut the budget itself by NT$6.36 billion (US$192.7 million). Opposition lawmakers’ actions have led to criticism of their “contravening principles of responsible governance.”
Not only are they reneging on their obligation to review the budget, they are harming the normal and stable operation of government agencies, and undermining the democratic government’s balance of powers.
The legislature is abandoning its obligation to conduct reviews and infringing on responsible governance.
Budgetary reviews are a core job component for legislators to ensure that government spending aligns with national development needs and upholds fiscal discipline.
In principle, the legislature should carefully review each ministry’s budget and decide whether to cut or adjust it. However, instead of conducting substantial deliberations, it told the Executive Yuan to cut NT$6.36 billion from the budget itself, essentially handing its responsibility to review spending to the executive branch and its ministries and agencies.
Such an abrogation of duty goes against the fundamental principles of responsible governance: The legislature must exercise supervisory powers pertaining to the budget and should not shift this and other duties onto other branches of the government, or demand that the executive branch review budgetary items and decide what stays and what goes.
Specifically, the legislature did not clearly enumerate the items it intends to cut or adjust; it instead demanded that the executive branch cut its proposed expenditure to meet the figure set by the legislature, leaving the executive branch in a tough position.
If ministries and agencies lack concrete direction in implementing the budget, this could lead to plans being halted due to insufficient funding, or to partial reductions in services and personnel due to budget shortfalls. This indeterminacy impacts the effectiveness of governance and harms the quality of public services.
This is not the first time the legislature has tried to pass its responsibilities to the executive branch, but is a long-standing abuse of budgetary review duties. Some opposition lawmakers are using “budget freezes” and demands that the Executive Yuan cut the budget itself to deepen political conflict and block implementation of government policy instead of carrying out precise budget adjustments through reasoned and rational deliberation. Their actions have the veneer of supervision, but the reality is that they are causing ministries to take on an unreasonable burden, further impacting the stability of government operations.
The legislature’s use of simplistic reductions of the budget without looking at actual items is a political propaganda tool. It has abandoned the professional spirit of budgetary reviews.
The legislature’s demand that the executive branch itself reduce the budget not only contravenes principles of responsible governance, but threatens the stable operations of government agencies.
The legislature should replace political manipulations with substantive reviews to make budget reviews a foundation that buttress government operations, not a tool for destabilization.
Edwin Yang is an associate professor at National Taiwan Normal University and chairman of the Central Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Tim Smith
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
RSS