Newly sworn in Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) — who replaced former TPP legislator-at-large Wu Chun-cheng (吳春城) following his resignation — on Monday questioned a National Science and Technology Council official about Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s investments in the US and its core chip manufacturing technologies. However, she consistently misspoke throughout her inquiry, saying meter (米) instead of nanometer (奈米).
When reporters attempted to ask her about the mistake, Liu said: “I was just speaking too quickly. You didn’t hear me clearly.”
I happened to be eating lunch at a street stall when I saw the report on the news the following day. I nearly spit out my food.
Liu was actually speaking quite clearly. She said “meter” — and not very quickly, either. From her debut, it was evident that this legislator-at-large had not done her homework, and that lying comes quite easy to her — is this the kind of lawmaker that the TPP carefully selected as Wu’s replacement?
If Liu were a member of a different party, there is no doubt that former TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) would have criticized her no end, calling her anything from a cockroach to a rat.
Some lawmakers benefit from the public’s resources, yet live in their own bubbles, completely oblivious to the costs we bear while using our livelihoods to accomplish nothing. It is truly disappointing.
This kind of figure will only harm the TPP’s reputation further — the original video went viral and garnered online mockery, with comments such as “a chip that large ... are they going to carve it with a plow?”
Liu has already become a laughingstock.
Fang Fu-chuan is an international trader.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then