President William Lai (賴清德) on Thursday last week announced 17 strategies to counter the Chinese Communist Party’s growing infiltration efforts against Taiwan, strengthening the public’s resolve to defend Taiwan and inspiring courage in veterans across the nation to safeguard the country.
Many veterans have openly shared their military ranks online. Unafraid of being doxxed or harassed, they boldly reveal their identities, discharge orders, full gear, rifles, military branches and expertise. Such individuals include marines, special forces, elite “frogmen,” members of the army, navy, air force, military police, chemical corps, communications and more — all sharing photographs from their military service years and reaffirming their unwavering determination to defend Taiwan.
Many alumni and current students left comments below these posts saying things such as “I am Taiwanese, I oppose communism,” and: “Hello, senior. Sergeant Chen reporting for duty.” One after another, they encouraged each other, ready to face this national crisis together.
It was at that moment that we veterans realized how many good friends we have surrounding us, all dedicated to protecting Taiwan. Female soldiers are not lagging behind, either — many women also posted online declaring their opposition to communism. Even women who have never served in the military left comments such as “I don’t know how to properly operate a weapon, but I oppose communism,” and “I’m willing to contribute.”
This fiery, anti-communist passion and sentiment are both powerful and unstoppable.
These veterans are our brothers and uncles, sisters and aunts — all who, during the most precious years of their youth, once served in the military to protect our country. Taiwan once had an army of 600,000 troops. While there are only 160,000 troops today, as long as our country is in need — and to protect the safety, wealth and property of our families, and safeguard our free and democratic way of life — we can form an army 1 million-strong at any time, assigning soldiers to various units required for combat missions across different branches of the military.
However, we often do not understand the origin of the stars the officers — who once led us and whom we served under, many of whom later advanced in rank to become generals — wear on their shoulders. Those stars were earned through the youth, blood, sweat and tears of the countless troops who helped build their careers. Everyone put in their best effort to fulfill their duties within their different roles and responsibilities — no one complained or felt they had been wronged.
However, many of the career soldiers who once constantly urged us to oppose communism and serve our country are now the first to side with the Chinese Communist Party. They have even threatened Taiwan’s young soldiers, saying that our military is unfit for battle and ridiculing new military recruits as being “strawberry soldiers” — soft and easily bruised.
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) even said that, in the event of a war with China, the “first battle will be the last.” Such self-deprecating remarks are extremely disappointing, especially coming from someone who once served as president.
The youth of each generation possess their own unique skill sets to take on important tasks. The military of the past depended on physical strength, while today’s military depends on technology. In the old days, physical fitness and combat skills were critical, as warfare often involved face-to-face confrontation — thus, we veterans received solid physical training — but modern warfare relies heavily on information and weapons. Technological skills are essential, and the younger generation’s ability to operate technology is far superior to ours.
Faced with this mission to protect our nation, passionate veterans are willing to take a stand, joining forces with the younger generation to form an army of 1 million. With this tremendous determination and powerful momentum, they stand ready to deter Chinese thoughts about invading Taiwan by force.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
RSS