A few days ago, a hospital system in northern Taiwan said hackers from the Crazy Hunter ransomware group attacked their patient data systems, not only taking more than 500 computers offline, but also stealing 16.6 million documents containing personal data. Afterward, the hackers peddled the data to a criminal ring for US$100,000.
Government agencies immediately demanded that hospitals boost their internal control mechanisms. They also reminded the public to be aware of possibly leaked personal information and urged all sectors to bolster data security and protections.
IT security is not just a matter of corporate responsibility, but concerns the public’s privacy as well, touching upon network security and data maintenance for vital public utilities and services. If we fail to respond properly, the problem could metastasize into a major breach of national security, turning into an invisible imminent threat.
A few days ago, the Association of Chinese Police Research convened a seminar to discuss the governance models the Australian government uses for handling fraud and network security. Network security governance was specifically brought up in the seminar. It is not just an important means of fighting fraud — it is a cornerstone of protections at the national security level.
Studies suggest that North Korea is a source of some ransomware used in attacks on large companies where embedded software siphoned off data, then throttled company computer systems to a halt.
Taiwanese corporations have increased their defenses and established more refined contingencies to fend off network attacks, and system throttling and paralysis. However, during the theft of US$1.5 billion of etherium on the Bybit cryptocurrency exchange platform during a routine transfer, Bybit’s multisignature mechanisms were infiltrated through social engineering. The hackers directly stole digital assets and continue to sell stolen private data to criminal rings.
However, cybercriminals have begun shifting away from that pattern of infiltration. Academics are proposing that the thinking behind crime policy no longer be solely centered on avoiding system paralysis, not paying ransoms or reminding the public to be aware of malicious software — the truth is that we must all pay attention to changes and trends in tech crime at all times.
To tackle online crime, Canberra established the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission, as well as the Australian Cyber Security Centre, and online reporting and case systems.
In the past, the Australian government classified frequently targeted victims of criminal groups into four tiers: government and related agencies; large transnational corporations; small and medium-sized businesses; and individuals. That has been simplified by combining the two business categories. Australia on Feb. 13 passed the world’s first innovative proactive prevention law, the Scams Prevention Framework. The framework made it mandatory for measures to be enforced in industries with high concentrations of fraudulent activity. It also includes codified comprehensive laws and regulations that businesses must follow.
To effectively fight against fraud, Australia temporarily put aside its anti-fraud task force and authorized the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission to act as the lead body with the primary responsibility of directing anti-fraud activities. Since the commission closely monitors whether regulated entities are complying with the prevention, detection, deterrence, response and documentation of fraud, it could hopefully clamp down on invisible imminent threats. The framework’s further development is worth the attention of government agencies and corporations.
Samuel Lin is an assistant professor at the Central Police University.
Translated by Tim Smith
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
RSS