Chinese social media influencer “Yaya in Taiwan” (亞亞在台灣), whose real name is Liu Zhenya (劉振亞), used her online accounts to openly advocate for “reunifying [China with] Taiwan through military force.”
As a result, the National Immigration Agency (NIA), citing risks of endangering national security and social stability, revoked her dependency-based residency permit under Article 14 of the Measures for the Permission of Family-based Residence, Long-term Residence and Settlement of People from the Mainland Area in the Taiwan Area (大陸地區人民在台灣地區依親居留長期居留或定居許可辦法).
Ironically, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is renowned for suppressing freedom of speech, has publicly supported this proponent of military unification under the pretence of “defending free speech.”
However, can advocating military unification be protected by freedom of speech? Consider this — if the CCP were to launch a military attack to forcibly invade Taiwan, Taiwanese would face immeasurable losses of life and property.
If advocating for unification with Taiwan through military force is considered exercising free speech, that would be equivalent to endorsing the CCP’s use of force to indiscriminately kill Taiwanese, treating Taiwanese lives as insignificant and viewing the nation’s soil as something to be trampled upon at will.
Such assertions are a significant threat to Taiwan.
Whether through peaceful unification, military unification or any other strategy, the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan would have the same outcome — the loss of Taiwan’s free speech as it exists today. Hong Kong serves as a vivid reminder of this.
Advocating for military unification is ultimately a call to dismantle Taiwan’s freedom of speech. Speech that seeks to destroy free speech has no right to be protected.
Taking a step back, if unifying with Taiwan through military force is as wonderful as Liu — who even nicknamed her daughter “Little Danggui” (小當歸), an affectionate nickname for Taiwanese children in China that is seen as symbolizing the idea of unification — claims, then she should be delighted about returning to the “motherland” now that the NIA has revoked her residency.
Returning to the motherland should be a joyous occasion, so why would Liu oppose the NIA’s decision?
Some prominent, pro-CCP pan-blue camp figures have even voiced sympathy and support for Liu — how odd.
Huang Wei-ping works in public service and has a graduate degree from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University in the US.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS