After a search for a new chief executive officer that lasted more than three months, Intel Corp has decided that Lip-Bu Tan (陳立武) is the best choice to salvage the company’s future. He will take up the most difficult job in the chip business, Bloomberg News reported on Wednesday evening. I think you could take it a step further — this might be the toughest gig in US tech, full stop.
In a letter, Tan told his new subordinates that they were “in many ways” the “founders” of “the new Intel” — some motivational speaking to give the endeavor the feeling of a fresh start.
What exactly the “new” Intel will look like is not yet clear. Tan wrote of his belief that Intel should lead at product design and manufacture, a hint — in my reading at least — that keeping the company intact, rather than splitting off its foundry business, would be the way forward.
The reality for Tan and his team is that the “new Intel” could end being the “last Intel” as we know it. It is final-throw-of-the-dice time. If Tan cannot execute Intel’s embattled turnaround plan, it seems unlikely anybody else will get the chance.
Failure would mean that Intel, a former jewel in the US tech crown, would almost certainly be picked apart. Intel Foundry — a manufacturing arm to make chips for other companies in addition to its own — has piqued the interest of outside investors, namely Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the company most to blame for Intel’s downturn (other than perhaps Intel itself).
Reuters on Wednesday reported that the Taiwanese colossus had been seeking allies to join a bid to buy and operate Intel’s fabrication plants.
It is unclear whether TSMC’s recent announcement of a US$100 billion US investment, hailed by US President Donald Trump earlier this month, has made a move for Intel Foundry less likely. Even if so, others would most likely be interested — rumors of other deals for different parts of the company, or all of it, regularly surface.
Some rightly question whether selling Intel Foundry to TSMC would further weaken the US’ standing in cutting-edge chips, given that TSMC would be expected to keep its most innovative research and manufacturing processes within Taiwan. Under this arrangement, US talent would ebb away. The better alternative — for competition in semiconductors and for the US’ position in this critically important industry — is to double down on a plan to keep Intel in one piece, slugging it out like a battered Rocky Balboa. That means keeping its own product design business under the same roof as its manufacturing.
Concerns have been raised that companies might be reluctant to use Intel plants to make their chips because of competition concerns, but that seems overstated. In recent months, it has been announced that Nvidia Corp, Broadcom Inc and Amazon.com Inc are checking out Intel’s manufacturing capabilities.
Although it is still early days, Bloomberg Intelligence analysts suggest the interest indicates those companies have some confidence in progress made on 18A — Intel’s next generation of chip manufacturing and a milestone on which the company’s future seems to rest.
Investors appeared cheered by Tan’s selection. Intel shares rose more than 11 percent in after-hours trading following the announcement.
However, there is no time for further delay. Tan is familiar with Intel. He is a 30-year industry veteran who previously served on the company’s board. He said that “Intel will be an engineering-focused company” and will take “calculated risks to disrupt and leapfrog.” He wants to find Intel’s “winning culture” again.
At this stage in Intel’s turbulent but proud history, if he cannot do it, no one else is likely to get a shot.
Dave Lee is Bloomberg Opinion’s US technology columnist. He was previously a correspondent for the Financial Times and BBC News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS