There are plenty of theories on why US President Donald Trump did what he did: Calling Russian President Vladimir Putin a “genius” and “savvy” to invade Ukraine in 2022, calling Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy a dictator, proposing to take over Gaza and Greenland, damaging its treasured relationships with Canada, Mexico and Europe, and voting with dictators at the UN — essentially flipping US foreign policy since World War II, harming democratic alliances by pausing US military aid and intelligence to Ukraine.
Trump might be a “negotiation genius,” but those actions raised suspicion and led to US Senator Jeff Merkley questioning whether he could be a Russian asset.
Setting speculation aside, trying to isolate China by cozying up to Russia — considered the “Nixon reverse” — would unfortunately not work. In fact, former US president Richard Nixon created a worse enemy by playing the China card against the Soviet Union. China, which is likely to overtake the US as the top GDP nation in the years to come, has become the greatest threat to the world’s democracy.
China and Russia would continue to be close for so long as they are authoritarian. Moreover, by letting Russia loose now, the threat to Europe would be postponed, but not eliminated, until Russia recovers from its war in Ukraine. Next time, the war would be even harder to fight. That might be the most contentious point Zelenskiy is concerned about. Even if a peace treaty is signed, security cannot be warranted. In fact, the 1994 Budapest Memorandum failed to protect Ukraine, even though it gave up its nuclear weapons in exchange for exactly that.
Former Polish president Lech Walesa, who won a Nobel Peace Prize for his pro-democracy efforts, said that without US commitment, it would have been impossible to break up the Soviet Union. He said that “[former US] president [Ronald] Reagan was aware that millions of enslaved people were suffering in Soviet Russia and the countries it conquered, including thousands of political prisoners who paid for their sacrifice in defense of democratic values with freedom.”
Reagan had the vision and leadership to call USSR the “Evil Empire” without hesitation, and his greatness is admired every day, as his statue stands in Warsaw vis-a-vis the US embassy, he said.
Former US general David Petraeus said that Russia’s military is on the verge of collapse.
In August last year, when Ukraine entered Kursk, 30,000 Russian soldiers were taken from Ukraine to defend its territory, as the internal force failed to do so, he said. Moreover, it also relies on inexperienced and poorly trained conscripts to fight. The morale is low, and the war is now fought on Ukraine’s terms.
Europe has a military stronger in numbers than that of Russia, but lacks unity and synchronization. By adding the strength of US, there is no doubt that Russia could be dismantled in months.
Russia’s economy is quickly deteriorating and civil wars are around the corner. The tyrannical Putin cannot sustain a prolonged war.
Only by reforming Russia to be democratic, similar to Japan and Germany after World War II, could peace and security be guaranteed for Ukraine and Europe. Breaking up Russia into a few democratic countries would forever bury Russian imperialism in history. That would truly isolate China. If Trump wants to be a great leader in the history books, it is time for him to help defeat and break up Russia, just as when the Soviet Union was broken up by Reagan.
If Europe goes alone to bring Putin to his knees and breaks up Russia, history would record it as the moment Europe took up the leadership of humanity and the democratic alliance, and the US would no longer be a world leader.
James J. Y. Hsu is a retired professor of theoretical physics.
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
Small and medium enterprises make up the backbone of Taiwan’s economy, yet large corporations such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) play a crucial role in shaping its industrial structure, economic development and global standing. The company reported a record net profit of NT$374.68 billion (US$11.41 billion) for the fourth quarter last year, a 57 percent year-on-year increase, with revenue reaching NT$868.46 billion, a 39 percent increase. Taiwan’s GDP last year was about NT$24.62 trillion, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, meaning TSMC’s quarterly revenue alone accounted for about 3.5 percent of Taiwan’s GDP last year, with the company’s
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
RSS