In front of a large crowd at a news conference during last week’s Chinese National People’s Congress and Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference — an annual gathering of the Chinese government known as the “two sessions” — Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) spoke about UN Resolution 2758.
Wang claimed that the resolution granted Beijing “the right to represent China,” and even proudly boasted that “the only official name for Taiwan recognized by the UN is Taiwan Province, China.”
The former statement is true, but the latter is the result of China buying influence over the UN. The first UN yearbook is proof of this. In 1947, Taiwan was technically still under Japan’s control, as the formal legal transfer of Taiwan’s sovereignty after World War II was still pending. Despite this, the 1946-1947 UN yearbook recorded “Formosa” as part of China’s territory. There is no other explanation for this other than that China had bought out the UN.
It was not until June 20, 1949, that the truth was revealed. Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) fled to Taiwan after the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) defeat by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Overcome with anxiety, Chiang sent a telegram to US general Douglas MacArthur — the supreme commander of the Allied Powers in the Far East at the time — pleading for assistance. In his message, Chiang requested he and the Republic of China (ROC) government be allowed to remain in Taiwan temporarily, as he and MacArthur opposed the spread of communism.
Chiang promised that the ROC would not permanently relocate its capital to Taiwan or seek exile there. This telegram was partially hidden from the Academia Historica Office and the KMT archives by former director of the National Palace Museum Chin Hsiao-yi (秦孝儀) to deceive the public.
Chiang’s promise not to permanently move the capital to Taiwan or go into exile demonstrates that he knew deep down that Taiwan did not belong to the ROC, and that the Cairo Declaration did not explicitly and legally grant the ROC sovereignty over Taiwan.
Wang also brought up the so-called legal basis for Taiwan’s “return” to China, claiming it was clearly stipulated in the Cairo Declaration. However, this is simply another one of Wang’s lies. Aside from the telegram from Chiang to MacArthur, which acknowledged that Taiwan did not belong to the ROC, then-US president Franklin D. Roosevelt and then-British prime minister Winston Churchill had reservations about China’s annexation of Taiwan. Therefore, the Cairo Declaration merely listed the return of Taiwan to China as a common “purpose” of the three countries — it was not a legal stipulation.
On Dec. 24, 1943, Roosevelt stated in one of his “fireside chats” — a series of 31 evening radio addresses — that one of the principles discussed with Chiang in Cairo was “the recognition of the rights of millions of people in the Far East to build up their own forms of self-government without molestation.”
Churchill, on the other hand, argued that Japan should give up control over Taiwan. Churchill also reiterated at a session of the UK Parliament on Feb. 1, 1955, that the Cairo Declaration was “merely a statement of common purpose” and that the San Francisco Peace Treaty signed in 1952 — also known as the Treaty of Peace with Japan — left the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty “undetermined.” This evidence can be accessed anywhere.
Wang’s tactics only succeed in deceiving ignorant reporters.
Sim Kiantek is a former associate professor of business administration at National Chung Hsing University.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
You wish every Taiwanese spoke English like I do. I was not born an anglophone, yet I am paid to write and speak in English. It is my working language and my primary idiom in private. I am more than bilingual: I think in English; it is my language now. Can you guess how many native English speakers I had as teachers in my entire life? Zero. I only lived in an English-speaking country, Australia, in my 30s, and it was because I was already fluent that I was able to live and pursue a career. English became my main language during adulthood
Somehow, US intelligence identified “the Houthis’ top missile guy” and pinpointed his exact location. At 1348 hours (Washington time), March 15, President Trump’s national security advisor Mike Waltz texted, “positive ID of him walking into his girlfriend’s building.” The unsuspecting Romeo entered. High above, the drone monitoring the building registered a flash. When the smoke cleared, Mr. Waltz texted, “…And it’s now collapsed.” RIP. The star-crossed “top missile guy” had been target number one in the now uproarious US Navy bombing campaign on that Sunday against the Yemeni rebels who have been holding the Red Sea hostage since October 19,
Taiwan on Monday celebrated Freedom of Speech Day. The commemoration is not an international day, and was first established in Tainan by President William Lai (賴清德) in 2012, when he was mayor of that city. The day was elevated to a national holiday in 2016 by then-president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文). Lai chose April 7, because it marks the anniversary of the death of democracy advocate Deng Nan-jung (鄭南榕), who started Freedom Era Weekly to promote freedom of expression. Thirty-six years ago, a warrant for Deng’s arrest had been issued after he refused to appear in court to answer charges of
The Opinion page has published several articles and editorials over the past few weeks addressing Taiwan’s efforts to leverage unique or strong aspects of its culture to increase international awareness of the nation. These have included submissions by foreign journalists and overseas students, highlighting how bubble milk tea, Guinness World Record attempts, the entertainment sectors, impressive scenery, world-class cuisine and important contributions to the high-tech supply chain can enhance Taiwan’s recognition overseas and therefore its soft power. That entails competing for attention in already crowded sectors. Other nations, after all, offer popular entertainment exports, beautiful scenic spots and great food.
RSS