A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed.
Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way.
Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has put the names of 32 KMT and 12 Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers at risk of facing recall votes. No Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) lawmakers are subject to recall, as all eight are legislators-at-large, not elected to any constituency.
It was public anger against the disruptive and potentially dangerous actions of lawmakers in the previous legislative session that has led to this juncture. The anger is mainly directed at the opposition, while the motions against the DPP lawmakers were in retaliation.
Chu and the KMT have been trying to distract from the chaotic proceedings of the previous session, during which they passed controversial and — many would consider — unconstitutional amendments by emphasizing their more reasonable proposals this session. Could the idea to “bring down the Cabinet” have been another attempt at distraction from the recall proceedings? If so, it would have failed dramatically and likely had the opposite of the intended result.
According to Article 3 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution of the Republic of China (中華民國憲法增修條文), a vote of no confidence in the premier can be initiated by a petition of at least one-third of legislators. Should more than half vote to pass the no-confidence motion, the premier would have to offer his resignation within 10 days.
However, the president would have the option to dissolve the legislature, with elections for a new set of lawmakers required within 60 days.
Given the reason for the mass recall movement, it is unlikely that the KMT would do too well in new legislative elections. The same big names facing recalls now, including KMT caucus leader Fu Kun-chi (傅崐萁) and Deputy Legislative Speaker Johnny Chiang (江啟臣), are as likely to fall in new votes as they would be in a recall.
Moreover, a successful no-confidence vote would require the support of the TPP.
TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) would be profoundly unwise to allow his party go from zero exposure in the recall movement to potentially zero seats following new legislative elections.
Had there indeed been any discussion within the KMT to push for a no-confidence vote, it would have been quickly rejected for the absurd idea that it is.
None of this does anything to reduce the panic among the KMT ranks about the mass recall. Indeed, the plunging morale has led to calls for Chu to step down as chairman. Among the names mooted as viable replacements are Fu, Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) and Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜).
Chu has had limited success in his role; he does need to go, but a new face would do little to assuage the public anger at what happened in the previous legislative session. Lu might be an effective chairperson, far more than Han, but if the public has issues with the KMT now, it is unlikely that it would fare any better with Fu in the driving seat.
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
Small and medium enterprises make up the backbone of Taiwan’s economy, yet large corporations such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) play a crucial role in shaping its industrial structure, economic development and global standing. The company reported a record net profit of NT$374.68 billion (US$11.41 billion) for the fourth quarter last year, a 57 percent year-on-year increase, with revenue reaching NT$868.46 billion, a 39 percent increase. Taiwan’s GDP last year was about NT$24.62 trillion, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, meaning TSMC’s quarterly revenue alone accounted for about 3.5 percent of Taiwan’s GDP last year, with the company’s
RSS