After years of grinding lower, a widely watched measure of fertility in a country battling significant demographic headwinds notched a small increase. While welcome, there is little chance South Korea’s popular narrative of a nation blighted by empty schools and a deserted countryside would be put aside. Smaller families are here to stay.
Nobody is popping the champagne. Few experts consider that a trickle of decent numbers represents a change in the long-term trend of slowing population growth. Nor is South Korea alone.
According to the UN, the world’s headcount would peak in the 2080s and then begin declining. Two other closely studied Asian economies reported a mixed bag on the birth front last week: Singapore’s gauge paused a decline, while Japan produced fewer kids than ever last year.
If euphoria is not warranted, nor is panic. It just gets in the way and risks an extreme response. By all means, pursue policies aimed at supporting families with two children, such as promoting parental leave, and easing what many couples see as the costly business of education. Just do not expect a big pop — quickly — from throwing cash and incentives at the issue. It took decades of policy to get birthrates down; it was once seen as critical to generating economic development. The reverse, cranking fertility higher, would be nigh impossible nowadays. Societal views have long evolved from thinking four to five kids is the norm.
Addressing the retreat in fertility and a rapidly aging society is a challenge for many governments.
“The dragon year effect has been diminishing over the years, reflecting the generational shift in attitudes and priorities among young couples,” Singaporean Minister Indranee Rajah told parliament on Friday last week, referring to last year’s Chinese zodiac sign. (It has traditionally been considered that people born in a dragon year encounter good fortune.) Preliminary figures showed the city-state’s total fertility rate, or TFR, remained at 0.97 last year, she said. The prior year marked the first time it had dipped below 1. South Korea reported a level of 0.75, the first gain in almost a decade. Japan, which reports its TFR midyear, recorded a figure of 1.2 for 2023.
What is a good number? Different economies shoot for a range of objectives, and immigration — along with artificial intelligence — are go-to responses for plugging the gap. However, immigration can be a tough sell. Total fertility rates are an estimate of how many children a woman would have, and 2.1 is considered the level at which a society can replenish itself.
Few prosperous economies have rates approaching that; the global level has come down from about 5 in 1960 to 2.2 today and is projected to be 1.8 by the end of the century, the UN said. Thailand, Taiwan, China and Malaysia are already below 2. Even the Philippines, an archipelago associated with large families, has seen a marked downdraft. Authorities in Manila are actively encouraging it. Like neighbors in the years after World War II, it is seen as a sign of progress.
That is something that is underplayed in much of the current doom and gloom. It is the result of policy success, albeit one that could not calibrate when the time was right. From the 1960s, military-backed regimes in Seoul geared objectives toward curbing family expansion as part of an anti-poverty drive; encouraging the creation of sprawling conglomerates was another. To appreciate Singapore’s desire for tinier households in the years after independence, its National Museum is a good start. One poster, from the early 1970s, shows a young mother in a messy apartment surrounded by screaming kids, laundry strewn over the room, while her husband looks on disapprovingly. Her thought bubble expressed deep remorse at marrying young. Another national slogan declared “two is enough.” The sentiment now is closer to “one and done.”
Disappointing though low fertility may be, those countries are wealthier than might have been imagined decades ago. Addressing birthrates — or alleviating the impact — deserves to be a priority, but it is hard to judge it a catastrophe. Singapore, for example, is consistently ranked among the most livable cities and its residents some of the happiest.
There was a time when demographic markers were not the stuff of front pages. That changed in Japan in 1990 when media reported breathlessly that the country’s TFR had slipped to 1.57 the previous year. That generated such anxiety that it became known as “the 1.57 shock.” In late 2019, before COVID-19 halted travel, I explored shifts in Japan and South Korea. The countryside was indeed challenged; Yubari, on the northern island of Hokkaido, about an hour from Sapporo, became the first Japanese municipality to file for bankruptcy. However, life in the big cities has much going for it. Japan is back as an investment destination. In South Korea, about half the population is crammed into the Seoul metro area. Popular culture around the world is cluttered with South Korean restaurants, music and streaming dramas.
What is noticeable today is that there is no shock, just resignation at the declining birthrates. That is a good start. Solutions, if they exist, would not come quickly. Adaptation would be the game.
Daniel Moss is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian economies. Previously, he was executive editor for economics at Bloomberg News.
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
After the confrontation between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Friday last week, John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser, discussed this shocking event in an interview. Describing it as a disaster “not only for Ukraine, but also for the US,” Bolton added: “If I were in Taiwan, I would be very worried right now.” Indeed, Taiwanese have been observing — and discussing — this jarring clash as a foreboding signal. Pro-China commentators largely view it as further evidence that the US is an unreliable ally and that Taiwan would be better off integrating more deeply into
RSS