After the dramatic events of recent weeks, no one can deny that we are living through a historic moment. The international order is transforming before our eyes, leaving everyone shell-shocked and confused. That sort of radical change is not unprecedented.
A similar moment happened in ancient China. The Qin (秦) state was determined to conquer all its rivals and unify the realm. Its main opponent was the Qi (齊) state. The rulers of Qi knew that they could not oppose Qin alone, so they made an alliance with smaller states. Working together, the coalition successfully countered Qin’s aggression for decades. Sound familiar?
Although that collective defense was working well, the ruler of Qi became arrogant and ambitious. He felt that his small allies were useless. Why not make a powerful friend instead? Qi abandoned its alliance and supported Qin instead. The ruler of Qi thought that if two superpowers cooperated, they could conquer smaller states and divvy up the spoils.
That cynical plan soon went awry. Qin used Qi to help it overrun smaller opponents. At first, Qi gained some territory. However, with its previous allies vanquished, Qi found itself isolated and exposed. Qin then turned on Qi and destroyed it. It turned out that abandoning smaller allies did not secure Qi’s safety. On the contrary, it shattered the delicate balance of power and allowed the aggressor to run rampant.
Now the world faces an eerily similar dilemma. US President Donald Trump has signaled his willingness to abandon the US’ NATO allies and support Russia’s aggression against Ukraine. He seems to think that smaller allies are useless parasites and the US has more to gain by befriending other strong countries.
The cautionary tale of Qi and Qin shows how that could backfire. Since World War II, the US (Qi) has used a coalition of allies to oppose Russia (Qin), which has been extremely successful, providing peace and stability. Now Trump is needlessly discarding that arrangement. Americans might regret the results.
Russian President Vladimir Putin does not hide Russia’s strategic goals. He wants to weaken and eventually dissolve NATO. Without a strong alliance to oppose him, Moscow would intimidate Europe and try to reassert control over former Soviet dominions. If the US abandons its European allies, the resulting power vacuum would embolden Russia, much as Qi’s appeasement inspired Qin to become more belligerent.
The historical parallels between the US and Qi serve as a warning. By abandoning smaller allies, Qi did not become more powerful. It merely helped Qin in its own subjugation. Just as Qin’s conquest led to a brutal and short-lived dynasty that soon collapsed, a Russian victory in Ukraine would lead to an unstable and dangerous new world order. It would signal to other aggressive powers, including China, that countries can use military force to redraw borders with impunity. For Taiwan, the implications of Trump’s U-turn on Ukraine are alarming. No one can predict the outcome of the resulting chaos.
Qi’s failure to uphold a united front against Qin was disastrous self-sabotage. Today, the US faces a similar moment of decision. Would it continue to support democratic allies and deter Russian expansionism, or would it seek temporary benefits by siding with an aggressor?
The lesson from history is clear. A defensive coalition can be effective in keeping a belligerent aggressor under control. When a powerful state abandons smaller allies, disaster can result. The US must reaffirm its commitments to those who dare to stand up against expansionist powers. Otherwise, like Qi, the US might find itself more vulnerable when aggressive rivals make it their prime target.
Bret Hinsch is professor emeritus of the Department of History at Fo Guang University.
Somehow, US intelligence identified “the Houthis’ top missile guy” and pinpointed his exact location. At 1348 hours (Washington time), March 15, President Trump’s national security advisor Mike Waltz texted, “positive ID of him walking into his girlfriend’s building.” The unsuspecting Romeo entered. High above, the drone monitoring the building registered a flash. When the smoke cleared, Mr. Waltz texted, “…And it’s now collapsed.” RIP. The star-crossed “top missile guy” had been target number one in the now uproarious US Navy bombing campaign on that Sunday against the Yemeni rebels who have been holding the Red Sea hostage since October 19,
China on Tuesday, April Fool’s Day, began two-day joint-force military exercises around Taiwan, painting them as a “severe warning and forceful containment against Taiwan independence.” However, the exercises have again proven the country increasingly showcasing its military muscles to be a true “troublemaker.” Without prior notice, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) Eastern Theater Command launched large-scale exercises codenamed “Strait Thunder-2025A,” deploying aircraft, drones and naval vessels including the Shandong aircraft carrier, as well as armed militia in the air and waters around Taiwan. The PLA claimed the military exercises were practice for precision strikes and a blockade to “close
Days ago, foreign media reported that Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Eastern Theater Command Director Lin Xiangyang (林向陽) is suspected to have disappeared under suspicious circumstances. The Eastern Theater Command is the core military department responsible for operations against Taiwan — the purging of its director, if true, would be a major blow to the morale of the Chinese military and the success of its training. On Tuesday morning — April Fool’s Day — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Eastern Theater Command suddenly announced the launch of joint military exercises in the air and maritime spaces surrounding Taiwan. The exercises
During the four-day Tomb Sweeping Festival holiday, many recall campaigns set up temporary stalls in their electoral districts to encourage more eligible voters to sign second-phase recall petitions. As of Wednesday, a total of 47 recall efforts — targeting 35 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and 12 Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers — had advanced to the second phase, which requires signatures from at least 10 percent of eligible voters in the constituency within 60 days to proceed to a final vote. Nearly all recall petitions against KMT legislators cleared the first-phase review and launched their second phase between March 8 and
RSS