When United Microelectronics founder and former CEO Robert Tsao (曹興誠) took on the role of leading the recall petition against Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯), her KMT legislative colleague, Weng Hsiao-ling (翁曉玲), accused Tsao of backing out of fulfilling a donation of NT$15 million (US$456,565) to National Tsing Hua University.
Tsao on Sunday issued a rebuttal that detailed the entire donation process, explaining that it was made in the name of the tech company he founded, and that ultimately, the truth is now out in the open. The issue here is not Tsao or his donation, but: Who got their hands on private donor data and leaked it to Weng, and the attempt at using behind-the-scenes “united front” tactics to discredit Tsao’s support for the petition to recall and unseat Hsu.
The source of Weng’s accusation that Tsao is untrustworthy because of a “missing” university donation was certainly not something Weng dreamed up herself, nor did they come to her in a dream as some sort of divine intervention or mystical telepathic calling.
The information likely came from one of the two following scenarios:
First, a staff member at National Tsing Hua University broke financial information and privacy laws and regulations by searching for Tsao’s donation record, but mistakenly thought the donation would have been a personal one made in Tsao’s own name. They then failed to find any record and provided such “lack” of information as ammunition for Weng, which paired well with the latest stage act in Weng and Hsu’s counterrecall saga.
Second, looking at how certain media outlets reported the issue, publishing articles saying that “Tsing Hua stated” and “Tsing Hua reiterated” not having received Tsao’s donation, but these outlets never specifically indicated which university department staff or spokesperson made the claims, nor did they verify the donation details.
If this is the case, there is a possibility that Weng and certain media outlets collaborated to spread disinformation in an attempt to destroy Tsao’s credibility and ruin his image as the leader of the recall petition against Hsu.
Information regarding personal donations falls under the scope of the Personal Data Protection Act (個人資料保護法). If someone at Tsing Hua University violated the law by hunting down Tsao’s donation history and provided it to Weng as ammunition in a defamatory campaign, they have contravened the law and should bear full responsibility for their actions.
If it was a deliberate attempt to spread disinformation, and they went out of their way to damage another person’s reputation or credibility, they are going to have to pay civil damages to Tsao.
Yeh Yu-cheng is a secretary at the Pingtung County Public Health Bureau.
Translated by Tim Smith
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS